Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(03): 158-166
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698332
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Influence of Diamond Sono-Abrasion, Air-Abrasion and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin

Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira
a   State University of Campinas
,
Patrícia Moreira de Freitas
b   University of São Paulo
,
Carlos de Paula Eduardo
c   University of São Paulo
,
Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
d   State University of Campinas
› Author Affiliations
Marcelo Giannini
e   State University of Campinas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Different surface treatments may affect bonding performance of adhesive systems to dentin. This study evaluated the influence of different methods of surface treatment on adhesion of bonding agents to dentin.

Methods: TDentin surfaces abraded with #600-grit SiC paper were used as control. Three methods of surface treatment (sono-abrasion, air-abrasion and Er:YAG laser irradiation) were used under specific parameters. Four adhesive systems (Tyrian, Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond and Single Bond) were applied to treated surfaces, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Composite blocks were built on bonded surfaces, then restored teeth were vertically and serially sectioned to obtain bonded slices for interfacial micromorphologic analysis or to produce beam specimens for μ-TBS bond test. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of 5%.

Results: The results indicated that the preparation of dentin with sono-abrasion or laser did not affect the bond strength, while the preparation of dentin with SiC paper and air-abrasion influenced the bond strength for some systems. A clear difference of the preparation of dentin surfaces and formation of hybrid layer and resin tags were noted.

Conclusions: Bonding effectiveness of both the etch-and-rinse and the self-etch adhesives can be influenced by different methods of dentin preparation. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:158-166)

Key words

Dentin; - Bond strength - Adhesive systems - Er:YAG laser - Sono-abrasion - Air-abrasion
 

  • References

  • 1 Tao L, Pashley DH, Boyd L. Effect of different types of smear layer on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 208-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Borges CFM, Magne P, Pfender E, Heberlein J. Dental diamond burs made with a new technology. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 73-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Berggren U, Meynert G. Dental fear and avoidance: causes, symptoms and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 109: 247-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Scott S, Hirschman R, Schroder K. Histological antecedents of dental anxiety. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108: 042-045
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2000; 34: 144-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rafique S, Fiske J, Banerjee A. Clinical trial an air-abrasion/ chemomechanical operative procedure for the restorative treatment of dental patients. Caries Res 2003; 37: 360-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hugo B, Stassinakis A. Preparation and restoration of small interproximal carious lesions with sonic instruments. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1998; 10: 353-359
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Trava-Airoldi VJ, Moro JR, Corat EJ, Goulart EC, Silva AP, Leite NF. Cylindrical CVD diamond as a high-performance small abrading device. Surf Coat Technol 1998; 108: 437-441
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile Bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 647-660
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Carvalho RCR, Freitas PM, Otsuki M, Eduardo CP, Tagami J. Influence of Er:YAG laser beam angle, work distance and energy density on dentin morphlogical changes: a SEM investigation. J Oral Laser Appl 2005; 5: 237-243
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Reis AF, Arrais CAG, Novaes PD, Carvalho RM, De Goes MF, Giannini M. Ultramorphological analysis of resin-dentin interfaces produced with water-based single-step and two-step adhesives: nanoleakage expression. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 090-098
    Google Scholar
  • 12 De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem A, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Tome AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission-Sem study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 262-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effects of smear layer on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 099-116
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Effects of differents burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 375-382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 758-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary selfetching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 296-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9: 338-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Keller U, Hibst R. Experimental studies of the application of Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9: 344-351
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA, Walsh JT. Shear Strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laserprepared dentin. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 599-605
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H. Comparison between Er:YAG laser and convencional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 1404-1414
    Google Scholar
  • 23 De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts PG, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strength of two Erbium: YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 322-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Trajtenberg CP, Pereira PNR, Powers JM. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an erbium:YAG laser. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 331-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ishizaka Y, Eguro T, Maeda T, Tanaka H. Effects of Er: YAG laser irradiation on human dentin: polarizing microscopic, light microscopic and microradiographic observations, and FT-IR analysis. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 31: 171-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Camerlingo C, Lepore M, Gaeta GM, Riccio R, Riccio C, De Rosa A, De Rosa M. Er:YAG laser treatments on dentine surface: micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM analysis. J Dent 2004; 32: 399-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ceballos L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Marshall GW. Bonding to Er:YAG-laser treated dentin. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 119-122
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Donadio-Moura J, Gouw-Soares S, Freitas PM, Navarro RS, Powell LG, Eduardo CP. Tensile bond strength of a flowable composite resin to Er:YAG-laser-treated dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2005; 36: 351-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Los SA, Barkmeier WW. Effects of dentin air abrasion with aluminum oxide and hydroxyapatite on adhesive bond strength. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 169-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. J Dent 2000; 28: 179-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sazk H, Türrkmen C, Günday M. Effects of Nd:YAG laser, Air-abrasion and acid etching on human enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 476-481
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Çehreli ZC, Yazici AR, Akca T, Özgünaltay G. A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. J Dent 2003; 31: 429-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Watanabe I, Saimi Y, Nakabayashi N. Effect of smear layer on bonding to ground dentin-relationship between grinding condition and tensile bond strength. J Japanese Soc Dent Mater Devices 1994; 13: 101-108
    Google Scholar