PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(04): 195-201
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698339
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effect of Mouthrinse Containing Propolis on Oral Microorganisms and Human Gingival Fibroblasts

Fatih Özan
a   School of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University,
,
Zeynep Sümer
b   School of Medicine, Cumhuriyet University
,
Zübeyde Akın Polat
c   School of Medicine, Cumhuriyet University
,
Kürşat Er
d   School of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University
,
Ülkü Özan
e   School of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University
,
Orhan Değer
f   School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
27. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of four different mouthrinse containing propolis solutions and mouthrinse containing 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) on oral microorganisms and human gingival fibroblasts.

Methods: Four different solutions of propolis were prepared and propylene glycol and alcohol were used as solvents for each propolis sample. Mouthrinse containing propolis was prepared at four different concentrations as 10%, 5%, 2.5% and 1%. Besides, CHX was used as control group. The antibacterial effects of five solutions on oral microorganisms were tested and their cytotoxic effects on human gingival fibroblasts were evaluated by agar diffusion test.

Results: At this concentrations effectiveness of mouthrinse containing propolis samples on oral microorganisms were not found as effective as CHX. On the contrary, samples found less cytotoxic on human gingival fibroblasts than CHX.

Conclusions: Standardized preparations of propolis can be used as a mouthrinse at appropriate concentrations. To obtain a standardized chemical composition, advanced researches are needed. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:195-201)

Key words

Mouthrinse - Propolis - Chlorhexidine - Antibacterial activity - Cell culture
 

  • References

  • 1 Kornman KS. The role of supragingival plaque in the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases. A review of current concept. J Periodontal Res 1986; 21 (suppl) 522
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wu-Yuan CD, Green L, Birch L. Progression and surface ultra structure of in vitro caused erosive lesions in human and bovine enamel. Caries Res 1991; 25: 081-087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Molan P. Why honey is effective as a medicine. Part 2. The scientific explanation of its effect. Bee World 2001; 82: 022-040
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Neiva Moreno MI, Isla MI, Cudmani NG, Vattuone MA, Sampietro AR. Screening of antibacterial activity of Amaicha del Valle (Tucuman, Argentina) propolis. J Ethnopharmacol 1999; 68: 097-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sforcin JM, Fernandes A, Lopes CA, Bankova V, Funari SR. Seasonal effect on Brazilian propolis antibacterial activit. J Ethnopharmacol 2000; 73: 243-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ghisalberti EL. Propolis: a revie. Bee World 1979; 60: 059-084
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Markham KR, Mitchell KA, Wilkins AL, Daldy JA, Lu Y. HPLC and GC-MS identification of the major organic constituents in New Zealand propoli. Phytochemistry 1996; 42: 205-211
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cheng PC, Wong G. Honey bee propolis: prospects in medicin. Bee World 1966; 77: 008-015
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Marcucci MC. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activit. Apidologie 1995; 26: 083-099
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wade C, Friedrich JA. Propolis power plus: the healthpromoting properties of the amazing beehive energize. New Canaan CT: Keats 1996; 0
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Koo H, Gomes BP, Rosalen PL, Ambrosano GM, Park YK, Cury JA. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and Arnica Montana against oral pathogen. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 141-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Madarova L. Antibacterial properties of propoli. Ceskoslovenska Stomatologie 1980; 80: 304-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Scheller S, Mundorff L, Ilewixs L, Lucial M, Skrobidurska D, Matuga W. Biological properties and clinical application of Propolis IX. Investigation of the influence of EEP on dental pulp regeneratio. Arzneim Forsch 1978; 28: 289-291
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Eley BM. Antibacterial agents in the control of supragingival plaque-a revie. Br Dent J 1999; 27: 286-296
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Emilson CG. Susceptibility of various microorganisms to chlorhexidine. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 255-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hennessey TD. Antibacterial properties of hibitan. Clin Periodontol 1977; 4: 036-048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Newman MG, Hulem C, Colgate J, Anselmo C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of plaque bacteri. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 1722-1732
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Loesche WJ, Kazor C. Microbiology and treatment of halitosi. Periodontol 2000 2002; 28: 256-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Roldan S, Winkel EG, Herrera D, Sanz M, Van Winelfoff AJ. The effects of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, cettylpyridinium chloride and zinc lactate on the micro flora of oral halitosis patients: a dual-centre, double-blind placebo-controlled stud. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 427-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sekino S, Ramberg PH, Uzel NG, Socransky S, Lindhe J. Effect of various chlorhexidine regimens on salivary bacteria and de novo plaque formatio. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 609-614
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Davis PH. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Island. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Bols: 1985: 001-009
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Grange JM, Davey RW. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue. J Royal Soc Med 1990; 83: 159-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bonhevi JS, Coll FV, Jrda RE. The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetic. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1994; 71: 529-532
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sönmez S, Kirilmaz L, Yucesoy M, Yücel B, Yilmaz B. The effect of bee propolis on oral pathogens and human gingival fibroblast. J Ethnopharmacol 2005; 102: 371-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Koo H, Cury JA, Rosalen PL, Ambrosano GM, Ikegaki M, Park YK. Effect of a mouthrinse containing selected propolis on 3-day dental plaque accumulation and polysaccharide formatio. Caries Res 2002; 36: 445-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Park YK, Koo MH, Abreu JAS, Ikegaki M, Cury JA, Rosalen PL. Antimicrobial activity of propolis on oral microorganism. Current Microbiol 1998; 36: 024-028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kujumgiev A, Bankova V, Ignatove A, Popov S. Antibacterial activity of propolis, some of its components and their analog. Pharmazie 1993; 48: 785-786
    Google Scholar
  • 28 de Castro SL, Higashi KO. Effect of different formulations of propolis on mice infected with Trypanosoma cruz. Ethnopharmacol 1995; 46: 055-058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dobrowolski JW, Vohora SB, Sharma K, Shah SA, Naqvi SA, Dandiya PC. Antibacterial, antifungal, antiamoebic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic studies on propolis bee produc. J Ethnopharmacol 1991; 35: 077-082
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cook NC, Samma S. Flavonoids: chemistry, metabolism, cardioprotective effects and dietary sourse. Nutr Biochem 1996; 7: 066-076
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mirzoeva OK, Grishanin RN, Calder PC. Antimicrobial action of propolis and some of its components: the effects on growth, membrane potential and motility of bacteri. Microbiol Res 1997; 152: 239-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Amaros M, Lurton E, Boustie J, Girre L, Sauvager F, Cormier M. Comparison of the anti-herpes simplex virus activities of propolis and 3-methyl-but-2-enyl caffeat. Nat Prod 1994; 57: 644-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bonhevi JS, Coll FV, Jrda RE. The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetic. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1994; 71: 529-532
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Takaisikikuni NB, Schilcher H. Inhibitory effects of apple polyphenols and related compound cariogenic factors of mutans streptococci. J Agricult Food Chem 2000; 48: 566-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Andres MT, Chung WO, Roberts MC, Fierro JF. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens spp. isolated in Spai. Antimicrob Agents and Chemother 1998; 42: 3022-3023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Liu CF, Lin CC, Lin MH, Lin YS, Lin SC. Cytoprotection by propolis ethanol extract of acute absolute ethanol-induced gastric mucosal lesion. Am J Chin Med 2002; 30: 245-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Socranskys SS, Haffajee AD. Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic target. Periodontol 2000 2002; 28: 012-055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Murray MC, Worthington HV, Blinkhorn AS. A study to investigate the effect of a propolis-containing mouthrinse on the inhibition of de novo plaque formatio. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 796-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hayacibara MF, Koo H, Rosalen PL, Duarte S, Franco EM, Bowen WH, Ikegaki M, Cury JA. In vitro and in vivo effects of isolated fractions of Brazilian propolis on caries developmen. J Ethnopharmacol 2005; 101: 110-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ikeno K, Ikeno T, Miyazawa C. Effects of propolis on dental caries in rat. Caries Res 1991; 25: 347-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of be propoli. Food Chem Toxicol 1998; 36: 343-367
    Google Scholar