RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698420
The Efficiency of SNP-Based Microarrays in the Detection of Copy-Neutral Events at 15q11.2 and 11p15.5 Loci
Funding None.Publikationsverlauf
09. Juli 2019
30. August 2019
Publikationsdatum:
16. Oktober 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00029027/202001/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0039-1698420_1900059-1.jpg)
Abstract
Prader–Willi, Angelman, Beckwith–Wiedemann, and Russell–Silver are imprinting syndromes. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficiency of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis with methylation-specific Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) in the detection of uniparental disomy in these syndromes. The patient samples with regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), covering 15q11.2 and 11p15.5 critical loci, were analyzed with MS-MLPA to demonstrate the efficiency of SNP microarray in the detection of uniparental disomy (UPD). In a total of seven patients, LOH covering 15q11.2 and 11p15.5 critical loci was detected. Two (28.6%) of these seven patients showed aberrant methylation (suggesting UPD) in MS-MLPA. SNP microarray is a useful tool in the detection of LOH; however, it should be used with caution, since false-positive or false-negative LOH results can be obtained. Although methylation analysis is recommended as the first tier test in the diagnosis of most of the imprinting disorders, combining methylation analysis with SNP microarray can enhance our evaluation process.
Ethics Approval
The study was not submitted to a research ethics committee. No financial or nonfinancial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its most recently amended version). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all patients for whom identifying information is included in this article. All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Authors' Contributions
All the authors contributed to the design and implementation of the research, analysis of the results, and writing of the article.
-
References
- 1 Court F, Tayama C, Romanelli V. , et al. Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment. Genome Res 2014; 24 (04) 554-569
- 2 Lacal I, Ventura R. Epigenetic inheritance: concepts, mechanisms and perspectives. Front Mol Neurosci 2018; 11: 292
- 3 Monk D, Mackay DJG, Eggermann T, Maher ER, Riccio A. Genomic imprinting disorders: lessons on how genome, epigenome and environment interact. Nat Rev Genet 2019; 20 (04) 235-248
- 4 Eggermann T, Eggermann K, Schönherr N. Growth retardation versus overgrowth: Silver-Russell syndrome is genetically opposite to Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Trends Genet 2008; 24 (04) 195-204
- 5 Zahova S, Isles A. The role of the Prader-Willi syndrome critical interval for epigenetic regulation, transcription and phenotype. Epigenomes 2018; 2 (04) 18
- 6 Brioude F, Kalish JM, Mussa A. , et al. Expert consensus document: clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14 (04) 229-249
- 7 Dawson AJ, Cox J, Hovanes K, Spriggs E. PWS/AS MS-MLPA confirms maternal origin of 15q11.2 microduplication. Case Rep Genet 2015; 2015: 474097
- 8 Ozyilmaz B, Kirbiyik O, Koc A. , et al. Experiences in microarray-based evaluation of developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies. Clin Genet 2017; 92 (04) 372-379
- 9 Santoro SL, Hashimoto S, McKinney A. , et al. Assessing the clinical utility of SNP microarray for Prader-Willi syndrome due to uniparental disomy. Cytogenet Genome Res 2017; 152 (02) 105-109
- 10 MRC-HOLLAND. Product Description SALSA MS-MLPA Probemix ME028–C1 Prader-Willi/Angelman
- 11 MRC-HOLLAND. Product Description SALSA MS-MLPA Probemix ME030–C3 BWS/RSS
- 12 Lyle R. Gametic imprinting in development and disease. J Endocrinol 1997; 155 (01) 1-12
- 13 Ramsden SC, Clayton-Smith J, Birch R, Buiting K. Practice guidelines for the molecular analysis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. BMC Med Genet 2010; 11 (01) 70
- 14 Kalish JM, Boodhansingh KE, Bhatti TR. , et al. Congenital hyperinsulinism in children with paternal 11p uniparental isodisomy and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet 2016; 53 (01) 53-61
- 15 Tucker T, Schlade-Bartusiak K, Eydoux P, Nelson TN, Brown L. Uniparental disomy: can SNP array data be used for diagnosis?. Genet Med 2013; 14 (08) 753-756
- 16 Liu W, Zhang R, Wei J. , et al. Rapid diagnosis of imprinting disorders involving copy number variation and uniparental disomy using genome-wide SNP microarrays. Cytogenet Genome Res 2015; 146 (01) 9-18
- 17 Wang J-C, Ross L, Mahon LW. , et al. Regions of homozygosity identified by oligonucleotide SNP arrays: evaluating the incidence and clinical utility. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23 (05) 663-671
- 18 Affymetrix. Affymetrix® Chromosome Analysis Suite (chAS) 2.0™ Software User Manual. P/N 702943 Rev 6 ed: Affymetrix; 2008
- 19 Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Korostelev SA, Zelenova MA, Yurov YB. Long contiguous stretches of homozygosity spanning shortly the imprinted loci are associated with intellectual disability, autism and/or epilepsy. Mol Cytogenet 2015; 8 (01) 77
- 20 Papenhausen P, Schwartz S, Risheg H. , et al. UPD detection using homozygosity profiling with a SNP genotyping microarray. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A (04) 757-768