Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2011; 05(01): 077-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698861
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Influence of Two Desensitizer Agents on the Microleakage of Adhesively Luted Ceramic Inlays

Esra Uzer Celik
a   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
,
Nazli Kumbaraci
b   Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
,
Ebru Cal
c   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
,
Turkun Murat
d   Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different desensitizers (Hemaseal & Cide and Aqua Prep F) on the microleakage of ceramic inlay restorations luted with adhesive resin cement. Methods: Cylindrical Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of thirty extracted human third molars. One of the desensitizers (either Hemaseal&Cide, Advantage Dental Products Inc. or Aqua-Prep F, Bisco) was applied to the cavities. Ten samples were used as controls. Ceramic inlays were fabricated using the heat-pressed glass ceramic technique (IPS Empress II). Inlay restorations were luted using adhesive cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar-Vivadent). The restorations were properly finished, stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h and subjected to 1000 thermal cycles. The microleakage scores were examined using a stereomicroscope at the 30x magnification after each sample was stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin. The data were analyzed using Kruskall Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests (P=0.05). Results: Aqua-Prep F samples showed significantly higher microleakage scores at the enamel margins than did the Hemaseal & Cide and control groups (P<.05). Hemaseal & Cide application led to less microleakage than the other groups both at the enamel and dentin margins (P<.05). Conclusions: Hemaseal & Cide desensitizer decreased the microleakage process at the enamel and dentin margins of inlay restorations luted with adhesive luting cement, while Aqua-Prep F increased the leakage scores at the enamel margins. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:77-83)

Key words:

Desensitizers - Microleakage - SEM - Inlay restorations
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Fiveyear clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004;32:379- 383.
  • 2 Swift EJ Jr, Lloyd AH, Felton DA. The effect of resin desensitizing agents on crown retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:195�200.
  • 3 Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34:3-10.
  • 4 Felton D, Bergenholtz G, Cox CF. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment. J Dent Res 1989;68:491�495.
  • 5 Akpata ES, Sadiq W. Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. Am J Dent 2001;14:34-38.
  • 6 Arrais CAG, Chan DCN, Giannini M. Effects of desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:144-148.
  • 7 Dagostin A, Ferrari M. Effect of resins sealing of dentin on the bond strength of ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2002;18:304-310.
  • 8 Leirskar J, Nordbo H, Thoresen NR, Henaug T, von der Fehr FR. A four to six years follow-up of indirect resin composite inlays/onlays. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:247-251.
  • 9 van Dijken JW, Lindberg A. Clinical effectiveness of a lowshrinkage resin composite: a five-year evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:143-148.
  • 10 Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:71-79.
  • 11 Say EC, Koray F, Tarim B, Soyman M, G�lmez T. In vitro effect of cavity disinfectants on the bond strength of dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int 2004;35:56-60.
  • 12 Turkun M, Turkun LS, Kalender A. Effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of nonrinsing dentin-bonding resins. Quintessence Int 2004;35:469-476.
  • 13 Turkun M, Cal E, Toman M, Toksavul S. Effects of dentin disinfectants on the shear bond strength of all-ceramics to dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:453-460.
  • 14 Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of chlorhexdine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:863- 869.
  • 15 Scheie AA. The role of antimicrobials. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM, eds. Dental caries: The disease and its clinical management. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003:179- 188.
  • 16 Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjaderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley D. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res 2007;86:529-533.
  • 17 Damon PL, Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Jakobsen JR. Effects of fluoride application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1996;66:61-64.
  • 18 Koh SH, Chan JT, You C. Effects of topical fluoride treatment on tensile bond strength of pit and fissure sealants. Gen Dent 1998;46:278-280.
  • 19 Nystrom GP, Holtan JR, Douglas WH. Effects of fluoride pretreatment on bond strength of a resin bonding agent. Quintessence Int 1990;21:495-499.
  • 20 Barcroft BD, Childers KR, Harris EF. Effects of acidulated and neutral NaF solutions on bond strengths. Pediatr Dent 1990;12:180-182.
  • 21 Meng CL, Li CH, Wang WN. Bond strength with APF applied after acid etching. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:510-513.
  • 22 Soeno K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of desensitizers on bond strength of adhesive luting agents to dentin. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1122-1128.
  • 23 Hahn P, Attin T, Gr�fke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2001;17:191-196.
  • 24 De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132.
  • 25 Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
  • 26 Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater 1996;12:290-294.
  • 27 Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:340-353.
  • 28 Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azeyedo CL, de Carvalho RM, da Julio Singer M, Grande RH. Moisture spectrum of demineralised dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:183-192.
  • 29 Dal-Bianco K, Pellizzaro A, Patzlaft R, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resin-dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2006;22:1150-1156.
  • 30 Nakaoki Y, Nikaido T, Pereira PN, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Dimensional changes of demineralized dentin treated with HEMA primers. Dent Mater 2000;16:441-446.
  • 31 Perdigao J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dental Mater 1999;15:282-295.
  • 32 Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water- HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater 1998;14:6-10.
  • 33 Dundar M, Cal E, Bulent G, Turkun M, Ozcan M. Influence of fluoride- or triclosan-based desensitizing agents on adhesion of resin cements to dentin. Clin Oral Invest 2010;14:579-586. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
  • 34 Nystrom GP, Holtan JR, Olin PS, Douglas WH. Technical note: fluoride pre-treatment effects on microleakage of a resin bonding agent. Dent Mater 1989;5:359-360.
  • 35 El-Housseiny AA, Jamjoum H. The effect of caries detector dyes and a cavity cleansing agent on composite resin bonding to enamel and dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000;25:57-63.
  • 36 Carrilho MR, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Tj�derhane L, Carvalho RM. Mechanical stability of resin-dentin bond components. Dent Mater 2005;21:232-241.
  • 37 Itthagarun A, King NM, Wefel JS, Tay FR, Pashley DH. The effect of fluoridated and non-fluoridated rewetting agents on in vitro recurrent caries. J Dent 2001;29:255-273.
  • 38 Owens BM, Lim DY, Arheart KL. The effect of antimicrobial pre-treatments on the performance of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:716-722.
  • 39 Yiu CK, King NM, Suh BI, Sharp LJ, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Incompatibility of oxalate desensitizers with acidic, fluoride-containing total-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:730-735.
  • 40 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Carvalho RM, Lai SC, Suh BI. Integrating oxalate desensitizers with total-etch two-step adhesive. J Dent Res 2003;82:703-707.