PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2011; 05(04): 465-471
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698920
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Conservative Approach for Restoring Posterior Missing Tooth with Fiber Reinforcement Materials: Four Clinical Reports

Emine Sirin Karaarslan
a   Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey.
,
Ertan Ertas
b   Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey.
,
Semih Ozsevik
c   Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey.
,
Aslihan Usumez
d   Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Gaziantep, Turkey.
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
30. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Adhesively luted, fiber-reinforced, composite-inlay, retained fixed-partial dentures can be a clinical alternative for the replacement of missing posterior teeth in selective situations. This type of restoration allows for satisfactory esthetics and reduced tooth preparation compared to a conventional, fixed-partial denture. This clinical report describes the use of a fiber-reinforced, compositeinlay, retained fixed-partial denture as a conservative alternative for the replacement of missing posterior teeth. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:465-471)

Key words:

Missing posterior teeth - Inlay - Fixed-partial denture
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems. J Prosthodont 2002;11:248-253.
  • 2 Rappelli G, Coccia E. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial denture to restore missing posterior teeth: a case report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:168-177.
  • 3 Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel GJ. Fixed partial dentures:allceramics, fibre-reinforced composites and experimental systems. Oral Rehabil 2003;30:873-877.
  • 4 Kerschbaum T, Haastert B, Marinello CP. Risk of debonding in three-unit resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:248-253.
  • 5 Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:31-41.
  • 6 Edelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Metal-free inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2001;32:269-281.
  • 7 Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:418-423.
  • 8 Marinello CP, Kerschbaum T, Heinenberg B, Hinz R, Peters S, Pfeiffer P, Reppel PD, Schwickerath H. First experiences with resin-bonded bridges and splints--a cross-sectional retrospective study, Part II. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:223-235.
  • 9 Vallittu PK, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:413-418.
  • 10 Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:431-436.
  • 11 Narisawa TO. An evaluation of acoustic emission from fibre-reinforced composites. J Mater Sci 1985;20:4527-4531.
  • 12 Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 1991;22:873-877.
  • 13 Freilich MA, Duncan JP, Meiers JC, Goldberg AJ. Preimpregnated, fiber-reinforced prostheses. Part I. Basic rationale and complete-coverage and intracoronal fixed partial denture designs. Quintessence Int 1998;29:689-696.
  • 14 Krejci I, Boretti R, Giezendanner P, Lutz F. Adhesive crowns and fixed partial dentures fabricated of ceromer/ FRC: clinical and laboratory procedures. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10: 487-498; quiz 500.
  • 15 Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:311-318.
  • 16 Lutz F, Gohring TN. Fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: maximum preservation of dental hard tissue. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:164-171.
  • 17 Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Schneider-Feyrer S, Handel G. In-vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced adhesive fixed partial inlay dentures. J Dent 1999;27:163-168.
  • 18 Iglesia-Puig MA, Arellano-Cabornero A. Inlay fixed partial denture as a conservative approach for restoring posterior missing teeth: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:443-445.
  • 19 Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT, Raffeiner O, Meredith HR, Foser HP. A clinical investigation on three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated with a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:95-106; quiz 108.
  • 20 Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:369-377.
  • 21 Ozcan M, Breuklander MH, Vallittu PK. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:337-345.
  • 22 Song HY, Yi YJ, Cho LR, Park DY. Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bending and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:347-353.
  • 23 Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Shehata MK, Marquis PM. The influence of fibre placement and position on the efficiency of reinforcement of fibre reinforced composite bridgework. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:785-791.
  • 24 Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Fiber-reinforced composite crowns and FPDs: a clinical report. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:239-243.
  • 25 Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995;11:103-110.
  • 26 http://www.bisco.com/instructions/in134r1.pdf.