Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43(01): 049-053
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699403
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Determination of hand and palm area as a ratio of body surface area in Indian population

Pawan Agarwal
Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, N.S.C.B. Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
,
Sashikant Sahu
Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, N.S.C.B. Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 January 2020 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Background: Accurate estimation of body surface area (BSA) burn is important. In small and patchy burns, the patient's hand is used to estimate percentage of burn which is traditionally considered as 1%. There is discrepancy about what percentage of TBSA is constituted by the palm and hand. Therefore, this study was designed to determine correctly the TBSA represented by the palmar surface of the entire hand and palm in the Indian population. Material and Methods: 300 healthy adult (male and female) and 300 healthy children (male and female) were included in the study. TBSA was calculated using DuBois formula and hand and palm surface area was calculated using hand tracing on plain paper. The hand/palm percentage of BSA (ratio) was determined by dividing hand/palm surface area by total BSA. Results: The mean hand and palm ratio for adults was 0.92% and 0.50%, respectively. The mean hand and palm ratio in children was 1.06% and 0.632%, respectively. Conclusion: The hand area (palm plus digits) is more closely represented to 1% of TBSA in Indian population.

KEY WORDS

Body surface area - hand area - palm area
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Charles SF, Burns B. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 2005;8:190-7.
  • 2 Laing JH, Morgan BD, Sanders R. Assessment of burn injury in the accident and emergency department: A review of 100 referrals to a regional burns unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1991;73:329-31.
  • 3 Lund CC, Browder NC. The estimation of areas of burns. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1944;79:352-8.
  • 4 American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support Manual for Physicians. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 1993.
  • 5 Kirby NG, Blackburn G. Field Surgery Pocket Book. London: HMSO; 1981. p. 85.
  • 6 Amirsheybani HR, Crecelius GM, Timothy NH, Pfeiffer M, Saggers GC, Manders EK. The natural history of the growth of the hand: I. Hand area as a percentage of BSA. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:726-33.
  • 7 Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 1989;5:303-11; discussion 312-3.
  • 8 Mostellar RD. Simplified calculation of BSA. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1098.
  • 9 Perry RJ, Moore CA, Morgan BD, Plummer DL. Determining the approximate area of a burn: An inconsistency investigated and re-evaluated. BMJ 1996;312:1338.
  • 10 Rossiter ND, Chapman P, Haywood IA. How big is a hand? Burns 1996;22:230-1.
  • 11 Nagel TR, Schunk JE. Using the hand to estimate the surface area of a burn in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997;13:254-5.
  • 12 Sheridan RL, Petras L, Basha G, Salvo P, Cifrino C, Hinson M, et al. Planimetry study of the percent of body surface represented by the hand and palm: Sizing irregular burns is more accurately done with the palm. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995;16:605-6.