J Wrist Surg 2020; 09(03): 244-248
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400509
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty for Paget's Disease of Bone

Patrick H. Mullett
1   Office of Medical Research, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada
,
Joost Willems
2   Department of Orthopaedic, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
,
Thomas J. Christensen
3   Department of Upper Extremity Surgery, Reno Orthopaedic Clinic, Reno, Nevada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 August 2019

10 October 2019

Publication Date:
26 November 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and ulnocarpal pathology, such as ulnocarpal impaction, are relatively common causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain. We herein report a rare case of ulnocarpal impaction and DRUJ arthropathy due to Paget's disease of bone (PDB) in the ulna.

Case Description A 65-year-old, right-hand-dominant male was diagnosed with right-sided ulnocarpal impaction secondary to PDB. While diagnosing the cause of this patient's ulnar wrist pain was relatively straightforward, the management of his pain and symptoms was less so. After a thorough discussion with the patient regarding medical versus surgical management, and after presenting all available surgical options, he opted for a total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty (TDRUJA). At 3-year follow-up, his wrist is pain-free, has excellent functionality, near-normal motion, and he is highly satisfied.

Literature Review Currently, there are no specific recommendations for surgical management of PDB in the ulna, causing ulnocarpal impaction. While resection of the pathologically enlarged ulnar head (Darrach procedure) and the Suavé-Kapandji (SK) procedure are standard surgical treatment options, a major known disadvantage of these procedures is painful ulnar impingement syndrome. TDRUJA, a relatively new treatment option, provides good long-term outcomes with high patient satisfaction and protects from ulnar impingement.

Clinical Relevance Since recommendations are lacking for surgical management of PDB, we propose that the TDRUJA be considered as an effective surgical option for the management of PDB causing ulnocarpal impaction. Furthermore, this can reduce the incidence of ulnar impingement, especially for patients who have pathologically enlarged ulnas that are prone to impingement.

Note

The work was performed at the Reno Orthopaedic Clinic.


 
  • References

  • 1 Ralston SH. Clinical practice. Paget's disease of bone. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (07) 644-650
  • 2 Scheker LR. Implant arthroplasty for the distal radioulnar joint. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (09) 1639-1644
  • 3 Kachooei AR, Chase SM, Jupiter JB. Outcome assessment after Aptis distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) implant arthroplasty. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2014; 2 (03) 180-184
  • 4 Grawe B, Heincelman C, Stern P. Functional results of the Darrach procedure: a long-term outcome study. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (12) 2475-80.e1 , 2
  • 5 Savvidou C, Murphy E, Mailhot E, Jacob S, Scheker LR. Semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (01) 41-48
  • 6 Sotereanos DG, Papatheodorou LK, Williams BG. Tendon allograft interposition for failed distal ulnar resection: 2- to 14-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (03) 443-448.e1
  • 7 Kakar S, Swann RP, Perry KI, Wood-Wentz CM, Shin AY, Moran SL. Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (07) 1364-1371
  • 8 Bellevue KD, Thayer MK, Pouliot M, Huang JI, Hanel DP. Complications of semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (06) 566.e1-566.e9
  • 9 Kakar S, Fox T, Wagner E, Berger R. Linked distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty: an analysis of the APTIS prosthesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39 (07) 739-744
  • 10 Rampazzo A, Gharb BB, Brock G, Scheker LR. Functional outcomes of the Aptis-Scheker distal radioulnar joint replacement in patients under 40 years old. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (07) 1397-1403.e3