A Compendium of Core Lexicon Checklists

Sarah Grace Hudspeth Dalton; Hana Kim; Jessica D. Richardson; Heather Harris Wright

doi:10.1055/s-0039-3400972

Seminars in Speech and Language, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Speech Lang 2020; 41(01): 045-060
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400972

Review Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Compendium of Core Lexicon Checklists

Authors

Sarah Grace Hudspeth Dalton

¹Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Hana Kim

²Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
Jessica D. Richardson

³Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Heather Harris Wright

²Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina

Abstract

Core Lexicon (CoreLex) is a relatively new approach assessing lexical use in discourse. CoreLex examines the specific lexical items used to tell a story, or how typical lexical items are compared with a normative sample. This method has great potential for clinical utilization because CoreLex measures are fast, easy to administer, and correlate with microlinguistic and macrolinguistic discourse measures. The purpose of this article is to provide clinicians with a centralized resource for currently available CoreLex checklists, including information regarding development, norms, and guidelines for use.

Keywords

discourse - aphasia - Core Lexicon

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Brady MC, Godwin J, Enderby P, Kelly H, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analyses. Stroke 2016; 47 (10) e236-e237
2 Dietz A, Boyle M. Discourse measurement in aphasia: consensus and caveats. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 487-492
3 Worrall L, Sherratt S, Rogers P. , et al. What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (03) 309-322
4 Kim H, Wright HH. A tutorial on core lexicon: development, use, and application. Semin Speech Lang 2020; 41: 20-31
5 MacWhinney B, Fromm D, Holland A, Forbes M, Wright H. Automated analysis of the Cinderella story. Aphasiology 2010; 24 (6-8): 856-868
6 Fromm DA, Forbes M, Holland A, MacWhinney B. PWAs and PBJs: language for describing a simple procedure. [Abstract]. Arch Clinical Aphasiology 2013 . Available at: http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2491 . Accessed October 10, 2019
7 Hudspeth SG, Dillow EP, Richardson JD. Core lexicon analysis: efficient assessment of narrative discourse in persons with aphasia. Technical session presented at: Annual American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; November 2013; Chicago, IL
8 Dalton SG, Richardson JD. Core-lexicon and main-concept production during picture-sequence description in adults without brain damage and adults with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (04) S923-S938
9 Kim H, Kintz S, Zelnosky K, Wright HH. Measuring word retrieval in narrative discourse: core lexicon in aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2019; 54 (01) 62-78
10 Kim H, Wright HH. Validity and reliability of the core lexicon analysis. Poster presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 2017; Salt Lake City, UT
11 Kim H, Kintz S, Wright HH. Function words in narrative discourse in aphasia. Poster presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 2017; Salt Lake City, UT
12 Dalton SGH, Hubbard HI, Richardson JD. Moving towards non-transcription based discourse analysis in stable and progressive aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2020; 41: 32-44
13 Macwhinney B, Fromm D, Forbes M, Holland A. Aphasiabank: methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (11) 1286-1307
14 Kim H, Wright HH. Concurrent validity and reliability of the core lexicon measure as a measure of word retrieval ability in aphasia narratives. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2019; 1-10 . DOI is: https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0063
15 Tanaka T, Branch W, Dalton SG, Richardson J. It's raining cats: further development of discourse checklists for picture description tasks. Poster presented at: Annual American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; November 2016; Los Angeles, CA
16 Kambanaros M. Action and object naming versus verb and noun retrieval in connected speech: comparisons in late bilingual Greek-English anomic speakers. Aphasiology 2010; 24 (02) 210-230
17 Mayer J, Murray L. Functional measures of naming in aphasia: word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology 2003; 17 (05) 481-497
18 Pashek GV, Tompkins CA. Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology 2002; 16 (03) 261-286
19 Zingeser LB, Berndt RS. Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pre-anomia: implications for models of language processing. Cogn Neuropsychol 1988; 5: 473-516
20 Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R) Pro-Ed. 2007