Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2020; 41(01): 020-031
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400973
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Tutorial on Core Lexicon: Development, Use, and Application

Hana Kim
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
,
Heather Harris Wright
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 December 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Evidence suggests that discourse-level assessment in aphasia should be implemented within clinical settings. However, existing discourse measures that are time and labor intensive in process prevent speech-language pathologists from applying such measures to their clinical practices. This article provides an overview of a lexicon-based analysis (core lexicon measure) that recently was developed and investigated for clinical usability. A new approach to core lexicon measures provides a simple scoring method with short instructions, which may be practical and time efficient for assessment and management of persons with aphasia. The article concludes with suggestions for clinical application and implementation.

Keywords

core lexicon - discourse analysis - aphasia

Disclosures

H.K. receives a graduate assistantship. She has no other financial and nonfinancial disclosures.


H.H.W. receives a salary from East Carolina University. She has no other financial and nonfinancial disclosures.


 

  • References

  • 1 Brady MC, Godwin J, Enderby P, Kelly H, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analyses. Stroke 2016; 47 (10) e236-e237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dietz A, Boyle M. Discourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point?. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 459-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pritchard M, Hilari K, Cocks N, Dipper L. Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2018; 53 (06) 1078-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Maddy KM, Howell DM, Capilouto GJ. Current practices regarding discourse analysis and treatment following non-aphasic brain injury: a qualitative study. J Interact Res Commun Disord 2015; 6 (02) 211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bryant L, Spencer E, Ferguson A. Clinical use of linguistic discourse analysis for the assessment of language in aphasia. Aphasiology 2017; 31 (10) 1105-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Coelho CA. Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: progress, caveats, and needs. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28 (02) 122-135
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kintz S, Wright HH. Discourse measurement in aphasia research. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 472-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, Le Dorze G. Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (11) 1364-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 de Riesthal M, Diehl SK. Conceptual, methodological, and clinical considerations for a core outcome set for discourse. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 469-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dietz A, Boyle M. Discourse measurement in aphasia: consensus and caveats. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 487-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wallace SJ, Worrall LE, Rose T, Le Dorze G. Discourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point? A core outcome set… or greater standardisation of discourse measures?. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 479-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kurland J, Stokes P. Let's talk real talk: an argument to include conversation in a D-COS for aphasia research with an acknowledgment of the challenges ahead. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (04) 475-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Armstrong L, Brady M, Mackenzie C, Norrie J. Transcription-less analysis of aphasic discourse: a clinician's dream or a possibility?. Aphasiology 2007; 21 (3–4): 355-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Boles L, Bombard T. Conversational discourse analysis: appropriate and useful sample sizes. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (7–8): 547-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Elia D, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ, Coelho CA, Belanger SA. An investigation of sample size in conversational analysis. I Paper presented at: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; November 1994; New Orleans, LA
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Loban W. Language Development: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hunt KW. Sentence Structures Used by Superior Students in Grades Four and Twelve, and by Superior Adults. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University; 1966
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kroll B. Ways communicators encode propositions in spoken and written English: a look at subordination and coordination. In: Discourse Across Time and Space. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California; 1977: 69-108
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Chafe W. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Halliday MAK. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague, Paris: Mouton; 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Olness GS, Gyger J, Thomas K. Analysis of narrative functionality: toward evidence-based approaches in managed care settings. Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33 (01) 55-67
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 MacWhinney B, Fromm D, Holland A, Forbes M, Wright H. Automated analysis of the Cinderella story. Aphasiology 2010; 24 (6-8): 856-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fromm DA, Forbes M, Holland A, MacWhinney B. PWAs and PBJs: Language for describing a simple procedure. Paper presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 2013; Tucson, AZ
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hudspeth SG, Dillow E, Richardson JD. Core lexicon analysis: efficient assessment of narrative discourse in persons with aphasia. Paper presented at: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; November 2013; Chicago, IL
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kim H, Kintz S, Zelnosky K, Wright HH. Measuring word retrieval in narrative discourse: core lexicon in aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2019; 54 (01) 62-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Day A. Good Dog, Carl. New York: Scholastic; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 27 McCully EA. Picnic. New York: Harper & Row; 1984
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R). San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Kim H, Kintz S, Wright HH. Function words in narrative discourse in aphasia. Paper presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference. May 2017; Salt Lake, UT
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cui G, Zhong X. Adaptation in aphasia: revisiting language evidence. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (08) 855-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dalton SGH, Hubbard HI, Richardson J. Moving towards non-transcription based discourse analysis in stable and progressive aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2020; 41: 32-44
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chen S, Bates E. The dissociation between nouns and verbs in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: findings from Chinese. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (01) 5-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Caramazza A, Hillis AE. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature 1991; 349 (6312): 788-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bates E, Chen S, Tzeng O, Li P, Opie M. The noun-verb problem in Chinese aphasia. Brain Lang 1991; 41 (02) 203-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kim M, Thompson CK. Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: implications for lexical organization. Brain Lang 2000; 74 (01) 1-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Luzzatti C, Chierchia G. On the nature of selective deficits involving nouns and verbs. Ital J Linguist 2002; 14: 43-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Berndt RS, Haendiges AN, Mitchum CC, Sandson J. Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain Lang 1997; 56 (01) 107-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zingeser LB, Berndt RS. Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pre-anomia: implications for models of language processing. Cogn Neuropsychol 1988; 5: 473-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Saffran EM, Schwartz MF, Marin OSM. Evidence from aphasia: isolating the components of a production model. Lang Prod. 1980; 1: 221-241
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Milman L, Clendenen D, Vega-Mendoza M. Production and integrated training of adjectives in three individuals with nonfluent aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (10) 1198-1222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sarno MT, Postman WA, Cho YS, Norman RG. Evolution of phonemic word fluency performance in post-stroke aphasia. J Commun Disord 2005; 38 (02) 83-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Meltzer-Asscher A, Thompson CK. The forgotten grammatical category: Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia. J Neurolinguist 2014; 30: 48-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Macoir J, Laforce Jr R, Brisson M, Wilson MA. Preservation of lexical-semantic knowledge of adjectives in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: Implications for theoretical models of semantic memory. J Neurolinguist 2015; 34: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Pro-Ed.; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Guo YE, Togher L, Power E. Speech pathology services for people with aphasia: What is the current practice in Singapore?. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36 (08) 691-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Verna A, Davidson B, Rose T. Speech-language pathology services for people with aphasia: A survey of current practice in Australia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2009; 11 (03) 191-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentation and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore, MD: Brooks; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Katz RC, Hallowell B, Code C. , et al. A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2000; 35 (02) 303-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ivanova MV, Hallowell B. A tutorial on aphasia test development in any language: Key substantive and psychometric considerations. Aphasiology 2013; 27 (08) 891-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How we should measure” change”: Or should we?. Psychol Bull 1970; 74 (01) 68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology). Vol 3. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86 (02) 420-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65 (23) 2276-2284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Dalton SG, Richardson JD. Core-lexicon and main-concept production during picture-sequence description in adults without brain damage and adults with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (04) S923-S938
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kim H, Wright HH. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Core Lexicon measure as a measure of word retrieval ability in aphasia narratives. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2019; (5): 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Dijkstra K, Bourgeois MS, Allen RS, Burgio LD. Conversational coherence: discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. J Neurolinguist 2004; 17 (04) 263-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36 (02) 338-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Schneider P, Dubé RV, Hayward D. The Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument. Retrieved from University of Alberta Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Available at: http:://rehabmed.ualberta.ca/spa/ennı 2005 . Accessed November 14, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Wright HH, Capilouto GJ. Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology 2012; 26 (05) 656-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Covington MA. MATTR User Manual. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Artificial Intelligence Center; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Covington MA, McFall JD. Cutting the Gordian knot: the moving-average type–token ratio (MATTR). J Quant Linguist 2010; 17 (02) 94-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Fergadiotis G, Wright HH. Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (11) 1414-1430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Glosser G, Deser T. A comparison of changes in macrolinguistic and microlinguistic aspects of discourse production in normal aging. J Gerontol 1992; 47 (04) 266-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Marini A, Boewe A, Caltagirone C, Carlomagno S. Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions. J Psycholinguist Res 2005; 34 (05) 439-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Kintz S, Hibbs V, Henderson A, Andrews M, Wright HH. Discourse-based treatment in mild traumatic brain injury. J Commun Disord 2018; 76: 47-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Dalton SGH, Kim H, Richardson J, Wright H. A compendium of core lexicon checklists. Semin Speech Lang 2020; 41: 45-60
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Fromm D, Forbes M, Holland A, Dalton SG, Richardson J, MacWhinney B. Discourse characteristics in aphasia beyond the Western aphasia battery cutoff. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2017; 26 (03) 762-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Conroy P, Sage K, Lambon Ralph MA. Towards theory-driven therapies for aphasic verb impairments: a review of current theory and practice. Aphasiology 2006; 20 (12) 1159-1185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Kim H, Kintz S, Wright HH. Development of a core function word set for clinical use. Paper presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; Whitefish, MT; 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Baayen R, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database (Release 2). Linguist Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Chung C, Pennebaker J. The psychological functions of function words. Soc Commun. 2011; 1: 343-359
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Gordon JK. Measuring the lexical semantics of picture description in aphasia. Aphasiology 2008; 22 (7-8): 839-852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Manning M, Franklin S. Cognitive grammar and aphasic discourse. Clin Linguist Phon 2016; 30 (06) 417-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143 (01) 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Conroy P, Sage K, Ralph ML. Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech?. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44 (06) 1036-1062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Law SP, Kong APH, Lai LWS, Lai C. Effects of context and word class on lexical retrieval in Chinese speakers with anomic aphasia. Aphasiology 2015; 29 (01) 81-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Ferguson A, Armstrong E. The Palpa: a valid investigation of language?. Aphasiology 1996; 10 (02) 193-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Mayer J, Murray L. Functional measures of naming in aphasia: word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology 2003; 17 (05) 481-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Pashek GV, Tompkins CA. Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology 2002; 16 (03) 261-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L, Murison R. Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: social and emotional health, and psychological well-being. Aphasiology 2003; 17 (04) 333-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Boyle M, Coelho CA. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1995; 4 (04) 94-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Penn C. Compensation and language recovery in the chronic aphasic patient. Aphasiology 1987; 1 (03) 235-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Lu X. The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners' oral narratives. Mod Lang J 2012; 96 (02) 190-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Grant L, Ginther A. Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. J Second Lang Writ 2000; 9 (02) 123-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Armstrong E. Aphasic discourse analysis: the story so far. Aphasiology 2000; 14 (09) 875-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Coelho CA. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (06) 1232-1248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar