Is there a Threshold Preoperative WOMAC Score That Predicts Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify threshold preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores that were predictive of patient dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective cohort of 3,324 patients undergoing a primary TKA was identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and the WOMAC score were collected preoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 year using four questions that focused on: overall outcome, activity, work, and pain. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify threshold values predictive of dissatisfaction. The overall satisfaction rate at 1 year was 89.7% (n = 2982). Patients who were satisfied had a significantly greater preoperative pain (3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–5.6, p < 0.001) and functional (4.5, 95% CI 2.6–6.5, p < 0.001) component and total (4.2, 95% CI 2.3–6.0, p < 0.001) WOMAC scores compared with those who were dissatisfied. ROC curve analysis demonstrated the preoperative pain (p = 0.001) and functional (p < 0.001) components and total (p < 0.001) WOMAC scores were significant predictors of satisfaction. Patients scoring < 36 for the pain and function components and < 35 for the total WOMAC score were more likely to be dissatisfied with their overall outcome, but the area under the curves (AUCs) for these predictive threshold values were 0.56, 0.54, and 0.60, respectively, indicating poor prognostic value. A similar finding was observed for satisfaction with pain relief and ability to work and recreational activities; however, in addition the stiffness component was also a significant (p < 0.001) predictor with a threshold value of < 43. Again, these thresholds were of poor prognostic value with an AUC of less than 0.57 for all these satisfaction questions. Threshold values in the preoperative component and total WOMAC scores were not reliable prognostic indicators of overall patient satisfaction or for satisfaction with pain relief, ability to do work, or recreational activities after TKA.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - outcome - WOMAC - predictor - satisfaction

Note

D.J.W. is a lecturer for Stryker. J.H. is a lecturer for Zimmer.

Publication History

Received: 11 April 2019

Accepted: 06 November 2019

Article published online:
12 December 2019

• References

• 1 Graham B, Green A, James M, Katz J, Swiontkowski M. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (01) 80-84
• 2 Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (12) 3854-3860
• 3 Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Cornell CN, Padgett DE. Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review. HSS J 2018; 14 (02) 192-201
• 4 Dieppe PA. Recommended methodology for assessing the progression of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995; 3 (02) 73-77
• 5 Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15 (12) 1833-1840
• 6 Walker LC, Clement ND, Deehan DJ. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty using the WOMAC score: a review of the literature. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (08) 736-741
• 7 Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Seong SC. Causes and predictors of patient's dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (02) 263-271
• 8 Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (01) 57-63
• 9 Judge A, Arden NK, Price A. et al. Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (12) 1660-1664
• 10 Rogers BA, Alolabi B, Carrothers AD, Kreder HJ, Jenkinson RJ. Can the pre-operative Western Ontario and McMaster score predict patient satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty?. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B [phone]
• 11 Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. The rate and predictors of patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty are influenced by the focus of the question: a standard satisfaction question is required. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B [phone]
• 12 Burch FX, Tarro JN, Greenberg JJ, Carroll WJ. Evaluating the benefits of patterned stimulation in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a multi-center, randomized, single-blind, controlled study with an independent masked evaluator. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16 (08) 865-872
• 13 Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA. Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18 (02) 72-82
• 14 Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference for the WOMAC index after TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (10) 2005-2014
• 15 Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis (Egypt) 2011; 2011: 591253
• 16 Farrar JT, Young Jr JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94 (02) 149-158
• 17 Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5 (09) 1315-1316
• 18 Bishop PA, Herron RL. Use and misuse of the Likert item responses and other ordinal measures. Int J Exerc Sci 2015; 8 (03) 297-302
• 19 Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 21-26
• 20 Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (03) 262-267
• 21 Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after total knee arthroplasty: early, persistent, and late. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B [phone]
• 22 Hoorntje A, Witjes S, Koenraadt KLM, Aarts R, Weert T, van Geenen RCI. More severe preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis were partially associated with better postoperative patient-reported outcomes in TKA patients. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (03) 211-217
• 23 Townsend LA, Roubion RC, Bourgeois DM. et al. Impact of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (06) 580-584
• 24 Scott CEH, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (09) 1253-1258
• 25 Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Deehan DJ. Increased symptoms of stiffness 1 year after total knee arthroplasty are associated with a worse functional outcome and lower rate of patient satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (04) 1196-1203
• 26 Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Behrend H, Giesinger K. WOMAC, EQ-5D and Knee Society Score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2154-2158
• 27 Clement ND, Weir D, Holland JP, Gerrand CH, Deehan DJ. An overview and predictors of achieving the postoperative ceiling effect of the WOMAC score following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (02) 273-280
• 28 Garriga C, Sanchez-Santos MT, Judge A. et al. Development of a model predicting non-satisfaction 1 year after primary total knee replacement in the UK and transportation to Switzerland. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 3380
• 29 Sanchez-Santos MT, Garriga C, Judge A. et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for patient-reported pain and function after primary total knee replacement surgery. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 3381
• 30 Tolk JJ, Janssen RPA, Haanstra TM, van der Steen MMC, Bierma Zeinstra SMA, Reijman M. Outcome expectations of total knee arthroplasty patients: the influence of demographic factors, pain, personality traits, physical and psychological status. J Knee Surg 2019; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692632.
• 31 Scott CE, Bugler KE, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC. Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (07) 974-981
• 32 Deakin AH, Smith MA, Wallace DT, Smith EJ, Sarungi M. Fulfilment of preoperative expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. A prospective analysis of 200 patients. Knee 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.07.018.
• 33 Shelton TJ, Gill M, Athwal G, Howell SM, Hull ML. Outcomes in patients with a calipered kinematically aligned TKA that already had a contralateral mechanically aligned TKA. J Knee Surg 2019; DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693000.
• 34 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Anis HK. et al. One-year patient outcomes for robotic-arm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (11) 1063-1068
• 35 Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Aróstegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15 (03) 273-280