Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00039245.xml
CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2019; 07(06): 176-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401996
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401996
Case Report
Single-Stage Hybrid Arch Repair for Patients with Shaggy Aorta
Funding None.Further Information
Publication History
22 July 2018
03 November 2019
Publication Date:
12 February 2020 (online)
Abstract
Operating on extended arch aneurysms that contain severe atherosclerotic plaques is difficult. In such cases, the incidence of intraoperative multiple embolization is very high. We applied single-stage hybrid arch repair, which involved ascending aorta replacement and debranching of arch vessels, consecutively with endovascular repair for two patients. This technique was developed to prevent embolization of atherosclerotic plaques during cardiopulmonary bypass, and abrasion of the plaques during thoracic endovascular repair. Both patients recovered without embolic complications.
-
References
- 1 Kanaoka Y, Ohki T, Maeda K, Baba T, Fujita T. Multiple analysis of risk factors of cerebral infarction in 439 patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (15) e3335
- 2 Perera AH, Rudarakanchana N, Monzon L. , et al. Cerebral embolization, silent cerebral infarction and neurocognitive decline after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Br J Surg 2018; 105 (04) 366-378
- 3 Shiiya N, Kunihara T, Kamikubo Y, Yasuda K. Isolation technique for stroke prevention in patients with a mobile atheroma. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (04) 1401-1402
- 4 Kent WDT, Appoo JJ, Bavaria JE. , et al. Results of type II hybrid arch repair with zone 0 stent graft deployment for complex aortic arch pathology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2951-2955
- 5 Ganapathi AM, Andersen ND, Hanna JM, Gaca JG, McCann RL, Hughes GC. Comparison of attachment site endoleak rates in Dacron versus native aorta landing zones after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59 (04) 921-929