Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2021; 10(03): 190-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402930
Original Article

Surgical Outcome of Giant Vestibular Schwannomas: A Retrospective Analysis

Mohamed I. Refaat 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza Governorate, Egypt
,
Omar Y. Abdallah
1   Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza Governorate, Egypt
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was self-funded by the authors.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Giant vestibular schwannomas, more than 4.5 cm in diameter, are still representing the majority of vestibular schwannomas in developing countries. The philosophy of incomplete and intracapsular tumor excision has been introduced in the management of these giant tumors, balancing the long-term tumor control and postoperative clinical outcome.

Objective The aim was to review the cases with giant vestibular schwannomas and studying their prevalence, morbidity, and mortality rates.

Patients and Methods This study was conducted retrospectively on data of patients who had undergone microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannomas in our institute between January and December 2017. The functional outcome of the patients was assessed by comparing the preoperative and the postoperative neurological examination, as well as the Karnofsky performance score.

Results Twenty-two cases with vestibular schwannomas were included in this study. Among these 22 cases, 15 cases had giant vestibular schwannomas (68.2%). The tumors’ largest extracanalicular diameters ranged from 4.5 cm to 6.2 cm. Postoperative images showed gross total excision of the tumor in 11 cases (73.3%), and subtotal excisions in four cases (26.7%). Twelve cases (80%) had postoperative facial palsy. We encountered no mortality in our cases and three cases (20%) were symptom-free postoperatively (apart from hearing affection).

Conclusion Large and giant vestibular schwannomas are still commonly met in neurosurgical practice in developing countries; they have different behaviors and presentations from those of smaller tumors. Both patient and surgeon expectations from surgery should be toward no mortality and mild or no morbidities.

Keywords

giant vestibular schwannomas - facial nerve preservation - bulbar affection - retrosigmoid approach - cerebellopontine angle


Publication History

Article published online:
26 October 2021

© 2021. Neurological Surgeons’ Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Harati A, Scheufler KM, Schultheiss R. et al. Clinical features, microsurgical treatment, and outcome of vestibular schwannoma with brainstem compression. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8: 45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Zhao F, Wang B, Yang Z. et al. Surgical treatment of large vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: outcomes on facial nerve function and hearing preservation. J Neurooncol 2018; 138 (02) 417-424
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Cheng S, Naidoo Y, da Cruz M, Dexter M. Quality of life in postoperative vestibular schwannoma patients. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2252-2257
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (03) E14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Turel MK, D’Souza WP, Chacko AG, Rajshekhar V. Giant vestibular schwannomas: surgical nuances influencing outcome in 179 patients. Neurol India 2016; 64 (03) 478-484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gerganov VM, Samii M. Giant vestibular schwannomas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (5-6) 627-628
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jain VK, Mehrotra N, Sahu RN, Behari S, Banerji D, Chhabra DK. Surgery of vestibular schwannomas: an institutional experience. Neurol India 2005; 53 (01) 41-45 discussion 45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Samii M, Gerganov VM, Samii A. Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (04) 860-867
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Zhang S, Liu W, Hui X, You C. Surgical treatment of giant vestibular schwannomas: facial nerve outcome and tumor control. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 137-144
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In MacLeod CM, ed, Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Columbia Univ press 1949: 196
  • 11 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93 (02) 146-147
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Pai I, Bowman J, Thomas N. et al. Management of large and giant vestibular schwannomas. Skull Base 2011; 21 (06) 379-384
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Silva J, Cerejo A, Duarte F, Silveira F, Vaz R. Surgical removal of giant acoustic neuromas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (5-6) 731-735
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Charpiot A, Tringali S, Zaouche S, Ferber-Viart C, Dubreuil C. Perioperative complications after translabyrinthine removal of large or giant vestibular schwannoma: outcomes for 123 patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2010; 130 (11) 1249-1255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar