Pneumologie 2020; 74(S 01): 105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3403295
Posterbegehung (PO20) – Sektion Klinische Pneumologie
Fortschritte bei Lungenfibrosen 2020
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Nintedanib plus sildenafil versus nintedanib alone in patients with IPF and severely impaired gas exchange: subgroup analysis by right heart dysfunction*

J Behr
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, University of Munich, LMU and Asklepios Klinik München-Gauting, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Germany
,
M Kolb
2   Mcmaster University and St. Josephʼs Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
JW Song
3   Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
F Luppi
4   University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
,
B Schinzel
5   Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
,
S Stowasser
5   Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
,
M Quaresma
5   Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
,
FJ Martinez
6   Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 February 2020 (online)

 

Rationale: Data from STEP-IPF in patients with IPF and DLco < 35% predicted suggested that sildenafil may be associated with benefits on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) versus placebo in patients with right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD) or right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH). In the INSTAGE trial, patients with IPF and DLco ≤ 35% predicted received nintedanib plus sildenafil or nintedanib alone for 24 weeks, stratified by the presence of echocardiographic signs of right heart dysfunction (RHD) (defined as ≥ 1 of RVSD, RVH, right ventricular dilatation, paradoxical septum motion, right atrium enlargement). Nintedanib plus sildenafil was not associated with significant benefits on HRQL versus nintedanib alone; however, in an exploratory analysis associated with stabilisation in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and reduced FVC decline. We assessed whether the presence of RHD at baseline influenced the effects.

Methods: Changes from baseline in St Georgeʼs Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, FVC at weeks 12 and 24, BNP at week 24; time to absolute FVC ≥ 5% predicted or death; and time to relative FVC decline ≥ 10% predicted or death were assessed in patients with and without signs of RHD at baseline.

Results: In total, 117 patients (nintedanib plus sildenafil 61; nintedanib 56) had signs of RHD and 156 (76; 80) did not. In both subgroups, nintedanib plus sildenafil had a numerically greater effect on change in SGRQ at week 24 and all endpoints related to FVC versus nintedanib alone. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup-by-time (TST) interaction for change in BNP at week 24, indicating a significantly greater effect of nintedanib plus sildenafil versus nintedanib alone in patients with RHD at baseline ([Table 1]). Significant TST interactions were also observed for change in BNP at week 24 in patients with versus without RVSD (n = 44 and n = 229), respectively) and with versus without RVH (n = 53 and n = 219), respectively).

Table 1

Echocardiographic signs of right heart dysfunction

No echocardiographic signs of right heart dysfunction

Treatment-by-subgroup-by-time interaction p-value

Nintedanib + sildenafil

Nintedanib alone

Nintedanib + sildenafil

Nintedanib alone

Mean (SE) change from baseline

Mean (SE) change from baseline

Difference (95% CI)

Mean (SE) change from baseline

Mean (SE) change from baseline

Difference (95% CI)

* Rate of decline (slope) in FVC over the 24-week period. ** Data are n (%) of patients with an event with between-group differences expressed as hazard ratios.

SGRQ total score

week 12

− 0.45 (.1.54)

− 0.45 (1.63)

− 0.01 (− 4.41, 4.40)

− 1.91 (1.35)

− 0.95 (1.30)

− 0.96 (− 4.65, 2.72)

0.7435

week 24

0.76 (1.79)

3.28 (1.91)

− 2.52 (− 7.67, 2.63)

− 0.16 (1.50)

1.93 (1.47)

− 2.10 (− 6.23, 2.04)

0.8999

BNP, ng/L, week 24

− 18.3 (18.3)

101.6 (18.9)

− 119.9 (− 171.3, − 68.5)

− 6.6 (15.9)

− 3.0 (15.5)

− 3.6 (− 47.2, 40.0)

0.0009

FVC, mL

week 12

35.4 (24.0)

− 12.3 (24.8)

47.7 (− 20.3, 115.6)

− 13.1 (21.2)

− 35.4 (20.3)

22.4 (− 35.5, 80.2)

0.5772

week 24

6.5 (29.9)

− 51.5 (31.4)

58.0 (− 27.5, 143.5)

− 39.9 (26.1)

− 64.4 (25.2)

24.5 (− 47.0, 96.0)

0.5541

Rate of FVC decline, mL/24 weeks*

22.9 (30.9)

− 63.3 (32.1)

86.2 (− 2.7, 175.0)

− 50.9 (25.5)

− 69.8 (24.4)

19.0 (− 51.0, 88.9)

0.2918

Absolute FVC decline ≥ 5% predicted or death**

22 (36.1)

27 (48.2)

0.72 (0.41, 1.27)

21 (27.6)

42 (52.5)

0.46 (0.27, 0.78)

0.2798

Relative FVC decline ≥ 10% predicted or death

17 (27.9)

22 (39.3)

0.71 (0.38, 1.34)

18 (23.7)

28 (35.0)

0.66 (0.36, 1.19)

0.8996

Conclusions: In patients with IPF and severely impaired gas exchange, nintedanib plus sildenafil had a numerically greater effect on FVC decline than nintedanib alone in patients with and without signs of RHD at baseline and the benefit on reducing BNP was more pronounced in patients with RHD, or specifically with RVSD or RVH, at baseline.

* presented at ATS 2019