Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2020; 3(S 01): S22-S34
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701327
Review Article

Abdominal Radiograph

Abhijit A. Raut
1   Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Prashant S. Naphade
2   Department of Radiology, ESIC Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sharad Maheshwari
1   Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Abdominal radiograph (AR) is often the initial radiological investigation performed while investigating abdominal pain even today. However, in the era of cross-sectional imaging, the role of AR in the diagnosis of acute pain abdomen is being questioned. When AR is used as a screening modality, the diagnostic yield is low. When performed in suspected cases of bowel obstruction or perforation, urinary calculi, or bowel ischemia, AR is often helpful. AR is often the first radiological investigation performed in acute abdomen. Although the role of plain radiograph is limited in the era of cross-sectional imaging, systemic approach and vigilant search for the radiological features on AR may be diagnostic and decide further line of investigation. Various gas patterns of intraluminal and free peritoneal air are helpful in localizing pathology. Different patterns of calcification seen in abdomen, ingested or inserted foreign bodies, and location of medical devices give a clue to diagnosis.

Keywords

abdomen - bowel obstruction - calcification - pneumoperitoneum - radiograph


Publication History

Article published online:
18 May 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Mirvis SE, Young JW, Keramati B, McCrea ES, Tarr R. Plain film evaluation of patients with abdominal pain: are three radiographs necessary?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147 (03) 501-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ. Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 2002; 225 (01) 159-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ponrartana S, Coakley FV, Yeh BM. et al. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (01) 8-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Loo JT, Duddalwar V, Chen FK, Tejura T, Lekht I, Gulati M. Abdominal radiograph pearls and pitfalls for the emergency department radiologist: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42 (04) 987-1019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 James B, Kelly B. The abdominal radiograph. Ulster Med J 2013; 82 (03) 179-187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nanni C, Garbini A, Luchett P. et al. Ogilvie’s syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction): review of the literature and report of four additional cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25: 157-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Townsend Jr CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery International Edition. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Maglinte DD, Reyes BL, Harmon BH. et al. Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (06) 1451-1455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Autenrieth DM, Baumgart DC. Toxic megacolon. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18 (03) 584-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Halpert RD. Toxic dilatation of the colon. Radiol Clin North Am 1987; 25 (01) 147-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wolf BS, Marshak RH. “Toxic” segmental dilatation of the colon during the course of fulminating ulcerative colitis: roentgen findings. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1959; 82: 985-995
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rosenblat JM, Rozenblit AM, Wolf EL, DuBrow RA, Den EI, Levsky JM. Findings of cecal volvulus at CT. Radiology 2010; 256 (01) 169-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peterson CM, Anderson JS, Hara AK, Carenza JW, Menias CO. Volvulus of the gastrointestinal tract: appearances at multimodality imaging. Radiographics 2009; 29 (05) 1281-1293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Moore CJ, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT of cecal volvulus: unraveling the image. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177 (01) 95-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ly JQ. The Rigler sign. Radiology 2003; 228 (03) 706-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Roh JJ, Thompson JS, Harned RK, Hodgson PE. Value of pneumoperitoneum in the diagnosis of visceral perforation. Am J Surg 1983; 146 (06) 830-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Woodring JH, Heiser MJ. Detection of pneumoperitoneum on chest radiographs: comparison of upright lateral and posteroanterior projections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165 (01) 45-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chiu Y-H, Chen J-D, Tiu CM. et al. Reappraisal of radiographic signs of pneumoperitoneum at emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27 (03) 320-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cho KC, Baker SR. Extraluminal air. Diagnosis and significance. Radiol Clin North Am 1994; 32 (05) 829-844
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cho KC, Baker SR. Air in the fissure for the ligamentum teres: new sign of intraperitoneal air on plain radiographs. Radiology 1991; 178 (02) 489-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Radin R, Van Allan RJ, Rosen RS. The visible gallbladder: a plain film sign of pneumoperitoneum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (01) 69-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Brill PW, Olson SR, Winchester P. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: air in Morison pouch. Radiology 1990; 174 (02) 469-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Menuck L, Siemers PT. Pneumoperitoneum: importance of right upper quadrant features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976; 127 (05) 753-756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cho KC, Baker SR. Depiction of diaphragmatic muscle slips on supine plain radiographs: a sign of pneumoperitoneum. Radiology 1997; 203 (02) 431-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pinto A, Miele V, Schillirò ML. et al. Spectrum of Signs of Pneumoperitoneum. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2016; 37 (01) 3-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jelaso DV, Schultz Jr EH. The urachus–an aid to the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum. Radiology 1969; 92 (02) 295-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rampton JW. The football sign. Radiology 2004; 231 (01) 81-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mindelzun RE, McCort JJ. The cupola sign of pneumoperitoneum in the supine patient. Gastrointest Radiol 1986; 11 (03) 283-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Balch CM, Silver D. Foreign bodies in the appendix. Report of eight cases and review of the literature. Arch Surg 1971; 102 (01) 14-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Studley JGN, Linehan IP, Ogilvie AL, Dowling BL. Swallowed button batteries: is there a consensus on management?. Gut 1990; 31 (08) 867-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lebowitz RL, Vargas B. Stones in the urinary bladder in children and young adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148 (03) 491-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Peri N, Graham D, Levine D. Imaging of intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26 (10) 1389-1401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 James M. Messmer and Marc S. Levine; Gas and Soft Tissue Abnormalities; Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology (4th edition), 12, 178–196. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders 2015