CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2020; 42(03): 124-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708095
Original Article
Obstetrics/High Risk Pregnancy
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Use of Intensive Care Unit in Women with Severe Maternal Morbidity and Maternal Death: Results from a National Multicenter Study

Uso de unidade de terapia intensiva em mulheres com morbidade materna grave: resultados de um estudo nacional multicêntrico
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
2   UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 August 2019

21 January 2020

Publication Date:
31 March 2020 (online)

Abstract

Objective To assess the use of the intensive care unit (ICU) and its effect on maternal mortality (MM) among women with severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

Materials and Methods A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study on surveillance of SMM in 27 Brazilian obstetric referral centers. The analysis focused on the association between ICU use and maternal death according to individual characteristics and disease severity. Two multivariate regressions considering use of the ICU, age, ethnicity, adequacy of care and the human development index were performed to identify the factors associated to maternal death and maternal near-miss.

Results Out of 82,388 deliveries during the period, there were 9,555 (11.6%) women with SMM, and the MM ratio was of 170.4/100 thousand live births. In total, 8,135 (85.1%) patients were managed in facilities in which ICUs were available; however, only 2,059 (25.3%) had been admitted to the ICU. On the multivariate analysis, when the severity of the maternal disease was measured by the maternal severity score (MMS), the strength of the association between the use of the ICU and maternal death was greatly reduced, along with inadequate care and non-availability of the ICU at the facility. On the assessment of only the more critical cases (SMO, severe maternal outcome), the same pattern of association between ICU and MM was observed. In the models used, only inadequate care and MSS were significantly associated with MM.

Conclusion The current study indicates that the main variables associated with maternal death are the severity and adequacy of the case management, which is more frequent in ICU admissions. The use of the ICU without the stratification of the patients by severity may not produce the expected benefits for part of the women.

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar o efeito da utilização de unidades de terapia intensiva (UTIs) na mortalidade materna (MM) entre mulheres com morbidade materna grave (MMG).

Materiais e Métodos Foi realizada uma análise secundária de um estudo transversal de vigilância de morbidade materna grave em 27 centros de referência obstétrica no Brasil. O foco desta análise foi a associação entre a utilização de UTI e morte materna segundo características individuais e condições de gravidade. Análises múltiplas considerando as variáveis uso de UTI, idade, etnia, adequação do cuidado e índice de desenvolvimento humano foram realizadas para identificar os fatores associados à morte materna e near-miss materno.

Resultados Dos 82.388 partos ocorridos durante o período de estudo, 9.555 (11,6%) mulheres apresentaram MMG, e a razão de MM foi de 170,4/100 mil nascidos vivos. Neste grupo, 8.135 (85,1%) pacientes foram atendidas em instituições com disponibilidade de leitos de UTI, mas apenas 2.059 (25,3%) foram de fato admitidas em leitos de UTI. Na análise de regressão multivariada, quando se considerou a gravidade do caso pelo maternal severity score (pontuação de severidade materna, MMS, na sigla em inglês), houve uma grande redução da força de associação entre utilização de UTI e morte materna, além da inadequação do cuidado e não disponibilidade de UTI na instituição. Na avaliação considerando apenas os casos de maior gravidade (desfecho materno grave, DMG), observou-se o mesmo padrão de associação entre UTI e MM. Nos modelos utilizados, apenas a inadequação do cuidado e o MSS apresentam associação significativa com a MM.

Conclusão O presente estudo aponta que as principais variáveis associadas à morte materna são a gravidade e a adequação do manejo do caso, mais frequentes nas internações em UTI. A utilização dos leitos de UTI sem a estratificação da gravidade da paciente pode não trazer benefícios esperados para uma parte das mulheres.

 
  • References

  • 1 Silva BGC, Lima NP, Silva SG, Antúnez SF, Seerig LM, Restrepo-Méndez MC. , et al. Maternal mortality in Brazil from 2001 to 2012: time trends and regional differences. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2016; 19 (03) 484-493 . Doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201600030002
  • 2 Chaves SdaC, Cecatti JG, Carroli G, Lumbiganon P, Hogue CJ, Mori R. , et al. Obstetric transition in the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health: exploring pathways for maternal mortality reduction. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2015; 37 (4-5): 203-210
  • 3 Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23 (03) 287-296 . Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007
  • 4 Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38 (08) 1091-1110 . Doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7
  • 5 Soma-Pillay P, Pattinson RC. Barriers to obstetric care among maternal near misses. S Afr Med J 2016; 106 (11) 1110-1113 . Doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i11.10726
  • 6 Crozier TME. General care of the pregnant patient in the intensive care unit. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 38 (02) 208-217 . Doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1600905
  • 7 Zampieri FG, Soares M, Borges LP, Salluh JIF, Ranzani OT. The Epimed Monitor ICU Database®: a cloud-based national registry for adult intensive care unit patients in Brazil. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2017; 29 (04) 418-426 . Doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170062
  • 8 Stow PJ, Hart GK, Higlett T, George C, Herkes R, McWilliam D. , et al; ANZICS Database Management Committee Development and implementation of a high-quality clinical database: the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. J Crit Care 2006; 21 (02) 133-141
  • 9 Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Parpinelli MA, Haddad SM, Camargo RS, Pacagnella RC. , et al; Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity. Brazilian network for the surveillance of maternal potentially life threatening morbidity and maternal near-miss and a multidimensional evaluation of their long term consequences. Reprod Health 2009; 6: 15 . Doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-15
  • 10 Cecatti JG, Costa ML, Haddad SM, Parpinelli MA, Souza JP, Sousa MH. , et al; Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity study Group. Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity: a powerful national collaboration generating data on maternal health outcomes and care. BJOG 2016; 123 (06) 946-953 . Doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13614
  • 11 Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Haddad SM, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, Katz L. , et al; Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity Group; Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity. The WHO maternal near-miss approach and the maternal severity index model (MSI): tools for assessing the management of severe maternal morbidity. PLoS One 2012; 7 (08) e44129 . Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044129
  • 12 Haddad SM, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Sousa MH, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML. , et al. Applying the maternal near miss approach for the evaluation of quality of obstetric care: a worked example from a Multicenter Surveillance Study. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 989815 . Doi: 10.1155/2014/989815
  • 13 Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (04) 335-343 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864
  • 14 Shah PS, Zao J, Ali S. ; Knowledge Synthesis Group of Determinants of preterm/LBW births Maternal marital status and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Matern Child Health J 2011; 15 (07) 1097-1109 . Doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0654-z
  • 15 Estima NM, Alves SV. Maternal deaths and deaths of women of childbearing age in the indigenous population, Pernambuco, Brazil, 2006-2012. Epidemiol Serv Saude 2019; 28 (02) e2018003 . Doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742019000200010
  • 16 Botelho NM, Silva IFMM, Tavares JR, Lima LO. [Causes of maternal death in Pará State, Brazil]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2014; 36 (07) 290-295 . Doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320140004892 Portuguese.
  • 17 Bandeira AR, Rezende CA, Reis ZS, Barbosa AR, Peret FJ, Cabral AC. Epidemiologic profile, survival, and maternal prognosis factors among women at an obstetric intensive care unit. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 124 (01) 63-66 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.015
  • 18 Keizer JL, Zwart JJ, Meerman RH, Harinck BI, Feuth HD, van Roosmalen J. Obstetric intensive care admissions: a 12-year review in a tertiary care centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 128 (1-2): 152-156
  • 19 Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Vogel J, Carroli G, Lumbiganon P, Qureshi Z. , et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2013; 381 (9879) 1747-1755 . Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60686-8