Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(02): 233-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709829
Original Article

Knowledge and Attitude of Dentists and Patients Toward Use and Health Safety of Dental Amalgam in Saudi Arabia

Hend N. Al-Nahedh
1   Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Ahmed A El-hejazi
1   Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Syed Rashid Habib 
2   Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess: (1) the perceptions of dentists in Saudi Arabia concerning the amalgam controversy, (2) their attitude toward the ethical responsibility of patient information, and (3) patients’ knowledge and attitude toward the use of dental amalgam.

Materials and Methods A total of 1,139 dentists were sampled on convenience by electronic survey. The questionnaire contained questions about the safety of dental amalgam, use of amalgam, case selection, alternate materials, and informing their patients about risks of amalgam. Also, 425 patients were sampled on convenience and information collected on their knowledge about amalgam and its acceptance in their oral cavities.

Results A total of 201 dentists and 425 patients participated in the study. A total of 60% of dentists and specialists declared it safe. A total of 32.4% (31) of general dental practitioners and 41% (43) specialists considered it a moral obligation to inform patients about the potential health risks associated with amalgam. Mercury toxicity was identified as the most common health hazard. About 57.3% dentists and 36.2% specialists opted for superior longevity as the principle advantage. Majority of patients (52.2%) in Saudi Arabia had no knowledge about dental amalgam. While 23.1% (98) had concern about poor color, 8.7% (30) knew it contained silver while only 7.8% (27) patients were aware of its mercury content.

Conclusion Majority of dentists in Saudi Arabia found it safe to use amalgam while the patients had little knowledge about the possible issues with amalgam. It is recommended to improve public awareness about impact of mercury containing products on the environment.

Keywords

amalgam - dental amalgam - dentists - health safety - dental restorations - filling


Publication History

Article published online:
12 May 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Mitchell RJKM, Koike M, Okabe T. Posterior amalgam restorations–usage, regulation, and longevity. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51 (03) 573-589
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rathore M, Singh A, Pant VA. The dental amalgam toxicity fear: a myth or actuality. Toxicol Int 2012; 19 (02) 81-88
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mortazavi G, Mortazavi SM. Increased mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after exposure to electromagnetic fields as a potential hazard for hypersensitive people and pregnant women. Rev Environ Health 2015; 30 (04) 287-292
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Jones DW. A Scandinavian tragedy. Br Dent J 2008; 204 (05) 233-234
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lessons from countries phasing down dental amalgam use2016. Available at: https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/lessons-countries-phasing-down-dental-amalgam-use. Accessed May 24, 2019
  • 6 Homme KG, Kern JK, Haley BE. et al. New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe. Biometals 2014; 27 (01) 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Eltahlah D, Lynch CD, Chadwick BL, Blum IR, Wilson NHF. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. J Dent 2018; 72: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Dental Amalgam Phase Down2018. Available at: https://www.fdiworlddental.org/resources/policy-statements/. Accessed May 24, 2019
  • 9 FDI World Dental Federation. FDI policy statement on dental amalgam and the Minamata Convention on Mercury: adopted by the FDI General Assembly: 13 September 2014, New Delhi, India. Int Dent J 2014; 64 (06) 295-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bengtsson UG, Hylander LD. Increased mercury emissions from modern dental amalgams. Biometals 2017; 30 (02) 277-283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr GW. Dental amalgam: the materials. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Argou-Cardozo I, Cano Martín JC, Zeidán-Chuliá F. Dental amalgam fillings and the use of technological devices as an environmental factor: updating the cumulative mercury exposure-based hypothesis of autism. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (04) 569-570
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Alkhudhairy F. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9 (01) 488
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Yaseen SM, AlShahrani I, Daghriri OH, Mufarreh M, Amer A, Tobaiqy S. Dentists perspective on silver amalgam restorations and associated hazards- a cross sectional study. Br J Med Health Res 2015; 2 (06) 1-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Khairuldean N, Sadig WM. Amalgam safety and alternative restorative materials: a cross-sectional survey among dentists. Saudi Dent J 1996; 8 (01) 27-33
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Doumani M. Habib A, Hatshan AR, et al Saudi patients’ knowledge and awareness about mercury in dental amalgam. IOSR J Dental Medical Sci) 2017; 16 (08) 68-70
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Udoye C, Aguwa E. Amalgam safety and dentists’ attitude: a survey among a Subpopulation of Nigerian dentists. Oper Dent 2008; 33 (04) 467-471
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Faraj BM, Mohammad HM, Mohammad KM. The changes in dentists’ perception and patient’s acceptance on amalgam restoration in Kurdistan-Iraq: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (04) ZC22-ZC25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bamise CT, Oginni AO, Adedigba MA, Olagundoye OO. Perception of patients with amalgam fillings about toxicity of mercury in dental amalgam. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (03) 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Mercury phase-out: a study of the experience of Swedish companies, Swedish Chemicals Agency –– KEMI, October 2011. Available at: https://www.kemi.se/global/pm/2011/pm-2-11-phase-out-of-mercury.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2019
  • 21 Sharif MO, Merry A, Catleugh M. et al. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (02) CD005970
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Lamacki WF. What is the ADA doing about amalgam?. CDS Rev 2011; 104 (02) 48
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar