Construction and Comparison of Predictive Models for Length of Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Regression Model and Machine Learning Analysis Based on 1,826 Cases in a Single Singapore Center
1
Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Shutao Zhang
1
Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Haozheng Tang
1
Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Xinhua Qu
1
Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Bing Yue
1
Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
› Author AffiliationsFunding This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81972086, 81672196, and 51971222); Shanghai “Rising Stars of Medical Talent” Youth Development Program (Youth Medical Talents—Specialist Program); National Key Research and Development Project; “Technology Innovation Action Plan” Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (grant no. 19411962800); Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (grant no. 20161423); Clinical Scientific Innovation and Cultivation Fund of Renji Hospital Affiliated School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University(grant no. PY2018-I-02).
The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model for length of stay (LOS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Between 2013 and 2014, 1,826 patients who underwent TKA from a single Singapore center were enrolled in the study after qualification. Demographics of patients with normal and prolonged LOS were analyzed. The risk variables that could affect LOS were identified by univariate analysis. Predictive models for LOS after TKA by logistic regression or machine learning were constructed and compared. The univariate analysis showed that age, American Society of Anesthesiologist level, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, general anesthesia, and operation duration were risk factors that could affect LOS (p < 0.05). Comparing with logistic regression models, the machine learning model with all variables was the best model to predict LOS after TKA, of whose area of operator characteristic curve was 0.738. Machine learning algorithms improved the predictive performance of LOS prediction models for TKA patients.
Keywords
length of stay -
total knee arthroplasty -
predictive model -
machine learning
Note
The approval from Institutional Review Board (Sing-health CIRB 2014/651/D) was obtained prior to the start of the study.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
References
1
Maradit Kremers H,
Larson DR,
Crowson CS.
et al.
Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (17) 1386-1397
2
den Hertog A,
Gliesche K,
Timm J,
Mühlbauer B,
Zebrowski S.
Pathway-controlled fast-track rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective clinical study evaluating the recovery pattern, drug consumption, and length of stay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (08) 1153-1163
3
Husted H,
Jensen CM,
Solgaard S,
Kehlet H.
Reduced length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty in Denmark 2000-2009: from research to implementation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (01) 101-104
5
Ayalon O,
Liu S,
Flics S,
Cahill J,
Juliano K,
Cornell CN.
A multimodal clinical pathway can reduce length of stay after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2011; 7 (01) 9-15
6
Kim S,
Losina E,
Solomon DH,
Wright J,
Katz JN.
Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (01) 69-74
7
Le Gall JR,
Lemeshow S,
Saulnier F.
A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270 (24) 2957-2963
8
Iwashyna TJ,
Liu V.
What's so different about big data? A primer for clinicians trained to think epidemiologically. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11 (07) 1130-1135
9
Churpek MM,
Yuen TC,
Winslow C,
Meltzer DO,
Kattan MW,
Edelson DP.
Multicenter comparison of machine learning methods and conventional regression for predicting clinical deterioration on the wards. Crit Care Med 2016; 44 (02) 368-374
10
Koyner JL,
Carey KA,
Edelson DP,
Churpek MM.
The development of a machine learning inpatient acute kidney injury prediction model. Crit Care Med 2018; 46 (07) 1070-1077
11
Fernández-Delgado M,
Cernadas E,
Barro S,
Ribeiro J,
Neves J.
Direct Kernel Perceptron (DKP): ultra-fast kernel ELM-based classification with non-iterative closed-form weight calculation. Neural Netw 2014; 50: 60-71
13
Abdullah HR,
Sim YE,
Hao Y.
et al.
Association between preoperative anaemia with length of hospital stay among patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty in Singapore: a single-centre retrospective study. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (06) e016403
16
Smith ID,
Elton R,
Ballantyne JA,
Brenkel IJ.
Pre-operative predictors of the length of hospital stay in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (11) 1435-1440
17
Adili A,
Bhandari M,
Petruccelli D,
De Beer J.
Sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty under 1 anesthetic in patients > or = 75 years old: complications and functional outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (03) 271-278
18
Martínez-Huedo MA,
Jiménez-García R,
Jiménez-Trujillo I,
Hernández-Barrera V,
Del Rio Lopez B,
López-de-Andrés A.
Effect of type 2 diabetes on in-hospital postoperative complications and mortality after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (12) 3729-3734.e2
19
Martinez-Huedo MA,
Villanueva M,
de Andres AL.
et al.
Trends 2001 to 2008 in incidence and immediate postoperative outcomes for major joint replacement among Spanish adults suffering diabetes. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23 (01) 53-59
20
Lovecchio F,
Beal M,
Kwasny M,
Manning D.
Do patients with insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes have different risks for complications after arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3570-3575
21
Yong CM,
Sharma M,
Ochoa V.
et al.
Multivessel coronary artery disease predicts mortality, length of stay, and pressor requirements after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2010; 16 (11) 1242-1248
22
Higuera CA,
Elsharkawy K,
Klika AK,
Brocone M,
Barsoum WK.
2010 Mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: predictors of early adverse outcomes after knee and hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (05) 1391-1400
23
Khormaee S,
Do HT,
Mayr Y.
et al.
Risk of ischemic stroke after perioperative atrial fibrillation in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (09) 3016-3019
24
van den Belt L,
van Essen P,
Heesterbeek PJ,
Defoort KC.
Predictive factors of length of hospital stay after primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (06) 1856-1862
25
Otero JE,
Gholson JJ,
Pugely AJ,
Gao Y,
Bedard NA,
Callaghan JJ.
Length of hospitalization after joint arthroplasty: does early discharge affect complications and readmission rates?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (12) 2714-2725
26
Inneh IA,
Lewis CG,
Schutzer SF.
Focused risk analysis: regression model based on 5,314 total hip and knee arthroplasty patients from a single institution. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (10) 2031-2035
27
Rezaei S,
Akbari Sari A,
Arab M,
Majdzadeh R,
Shaahmadi F,
Mohammadpoorasl A.
The association between smoking status and hospital length of stay: evidence from a hospital-based cohort. Hosp Pract (1995) 2016; 44 (03) 129-132
28
Chen L,
Dubrawski A,
Wang D.
et al.
Using supervised machine learning to classify real alerts and artifact in online multisignal vital sign monitoring data. Crit Care Med 2016; 44 (07) e456-e463