Simulation Based Skills Training in Neurosurgery and Contemporary Surgical Practices

SUMMARY

Neurosurgery training is based on a time-bound apprenticeship model, resulting in mentor-dependent, non-uniform, anecdotal, slow skills acquisition, sometimes with morbid consequences. The complexity of neurosurgical procedures and constraints of present education have demands for alternative methods of training. The use of simulation in surgical skills training was pioneered by work in laparoscopy, which began only in the last 25 years. Existing neurosurgery training model should be supplemented with efficient skills training curricula.

The present study illustrates formulation, standardization, validation and evaluation of efficacy of neurosurgery skills training modules using formative and summative assessment. 160 regular residents and short-term trainees were trained over 3096 skills training sessions under formative assessment; 176 'graduate neurosurgeons' were trained with 12 skills training programs under summative assessment. Training involved skills development in micro-neurosurgery, high-speed drilling, neuroendoscopy and spine-instrumentation by practice on structured low and high-fidelity simulation models. The effectiveness of content, course modules, and teaching faculty on skills development were assessed using spot and gap-based evaluation.

Seven basic, 7 intermediate and 14 advanced skills training modules have been developed. Trainees rated 71% of overall training sessions as excellent quality content with 69·8%, 70·1%, and 71% respectively for micro-suturing and high-speed drilling, neuro-endoscopy and spine-instrumentation modules. Faculty with higher ratings was included as program instructors. On gap-based evaluation, >80% of responded trainees reported better orientation with high speed drilling followed by micro-neurosurgery and spine-instrumentation. Neuro-endoscopy training scored low assimilation into clinical practice.We suggest structured modular validated skills training curriculum to supplement the existing neurosurgery training. This would help in improving learning curve outside operation-rooms, at convenience and individualized needs of trainees under supervision, and would thus help in skills translation without endangering patients.

Keywords

Competency - Curriculum - Modular - Neurosurgery Education - Residency - Simulation

GOLDEN JUBILEE COMMEMORATION AWARD LECTURE delivered during NAMSCON 2015 at the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna.

Publication History

Article published online:
09 May 2020

• REFERENCES

• 1 Barnes RW, Lang NP, Whiteside MF (1989). Halstedian technique revisited. Innovations in teaching surgical skills. Ann Surg 210:118- 121.
• 2 Long DM (2000). Competencybased Residency Training: The Next Advance in Graduate Medical Education. Acad Med 75:1178-1183.
• 3 Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK, et al. (1999). Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177:167–170.
• 4 ACGME, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Program and Institutional Accreditation, Surgical Specialties, Neurological Surgery (Accessed Dec 29, 2013 at http://www.acgme.org/ acgmeweb/tabid/135/ProgramandIn stitutionalAccreditation/SurgicalSpe cialties/NeurologicalSurgery.aspx).
• 5 MazoolaCA , Lobel D A , Krishnamurthy S, Bloomgarden GA, Benzil DL (2010). Efficacy of Neurosurgery Resident Education in the New Millennium: The 2008 Council of State Neurosurgical Societies Post-Residency Survey Results. Neurosurgery 67:225-233.
• 6 Reznick RK (1993). Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165:358-361.
• 7 Reznick RK, Regehr G, MacRae H, et al. (1997). Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226 –230.
• 8 Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR (2002). Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.Ann Intern Med 137:511–520.
• 9 Patel NV, Robbins JM, Shanley CJ (2009). Low fidelity exercises for basic surgical skills training and assessment. Am J Surg 197:119-125.
• 10 Yasargil MG (1999). A legacy of microneurosurgery: memoirs, lessons and axioms. Neurosurgery 45:1025-1092.
• 11 Yasargil MG (2010). Personal considerations on the history of microneurosurgery. J Neurosurg 112:1163-1175.
• 12 Tripathi M, Deo RC, Suri A, et al. (2015). Kawase's Triangle versus Modified Dolenc Kawase Rhomboid Approach for Middle Cranial Fossa Lesions with Variable Anteroposterior Extension. J Neurosurg 3:1-9.
• 13 Suri A, Tripathi M, Deo RC (2014). Anterolateral Trans-Cavernous Extradural Petrosectomy Approach: 3-D Demonstration in Cadavers. Neurosurgery Suppl 4, 656..
• 14 Suri A, Roy TS, Lalwani S, et al. (2014). Practical Guidelines for Setting Up Neurosurgery Skills Training Cadaver Laboratory in India. Neurol India 32(3):1-8.
• 15 Suri A, Bettag M, Tripathi M, et al. (2014). Simulation in Neurosurgery in India- NETS. CNS Quarterly 3:23- 26.
• 16 Suri A, Tripathi M, Baby B, Banerji S (2013). Beyond the Lenses: Development of Hands-on and Virtual Neuroendoscopy Skills Training. Venkataramanaa NK, Suri A, Deopujari CE, eds. Clinical Neuroendoscopy. Current Status- by Neuroendoscopy Study Group of India , NewDelhi : Thieme Publishers. 139-149.
• 17 Jotwani P, Srivastav V, Tripathi M, et al. (2014). Free-access Open-source e-Learning in Comprehensive Neurosurgery Skills Training. Neurol India 62(4): 352-361.
• 18 Tripathi M, Deo RC, Damodaran N, et al. (2015). Quantitative Analysis of Variable Extent of Anterior Clinoidectomy With Intradural and Extradural Approaches: 3D Analysis a n d C a d a v e r D i s s e c t i o n . Neurosurgery 11(3):147-161.
• 19 Selden NR, Origitano TC, Burchiel KJ, et al. (2012). A national fundamentals curriculum for neurosurgery PGY1 residents: the 2010 Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses. Neurosurgery 70:971-981.
• 20 Satava RM, Gallagher AG, Pellegrini CA (2003). Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy and metrics. J Am Coll Surg 196(6):933-937.
• 21 Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS eds. (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
• 22 Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ (1999). The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126(1):66- 75.
• 23 Blum BL, Sigllior VG (1986). An expert system for designing information systems. John Hopkins APL Technical Digest 7:23-31.
• 24 Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006). Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. NEJM 355:2664-2669.
• 25 Ericsson KA ed. (1996). The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 26 Long DM (2004). Competencybased training in Neurosurgery: The next revolution in Medical Education. Surg Neurol 61:5-25.
• 27 Satava RM, Cuschieri A, Hamdorf J (2003). Metrics for objective assessment .Surg End osc 17(2):220–226.
• 28 Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 162 p.
• 29 Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Traynor O, Neary PC (2014). Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation trasferable to the operation theatre. Am J Surg 207:146-157.
• 30 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. (2004). Laboratory based training in urologic microsurgery with bench model simulators: arandomized control ledtrial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol 172:378-381.
• 31 Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2004). Computer simulator training enhances the competency of g a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y f e l l o w s a t colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 99:33-37.
• 32 Lawton MT, Narvid J, Quinones- Hinojosa A (2007). Predictors of neurosurgical career choice among residents and residency applicants. Neurosurgery 60(5):934-939.
• 33 Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK, et al. (1999). Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177:167-170.