PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(13): 1393-1402
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713000
Original Article

Pregnancy Outcomes after Preeclampsia: The Effects of Interpregnancy Weight Change

Maya Tabet
1   Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
,
Soumya Banna
2   School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
,
Lan Luong
1   Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
,
Russell Kirby
3   Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
,
Jen Jen Chang
1   Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to examine the effects of interpregnancy weight change on pregnancy outcomes, including recurrent preeclampsia, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), and cesarean delivery, among women with a history of preeclampsia. We also evaluated whether these associations were modified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) category in the first pregnancy (BMI < 25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2) and if associations were present among women who maintained a healthy BMI category in both pregnancies.

Study Design We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study including 15,108 women who delivered their first two nonanomalous singleton live births in Missouri (1989–2005) and experienced preeclampsia in the first pregnancy. We performed Poisson regression with robust error variance to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for outcomes of interest after controlling for potential confounders.

Results Interpregnancy weight gain was associated with increased risk of recurrent preeclampsia, LGA, and cesarean delivery. These risks increased in a “dose–response” manner with increasing magnitude of interpregnancy weight gain and were generally more pronounced among women who were underweight or normal weight in the first pregnancy. Interpregnancy weight loss exceeding 1 BMI unit was associated with increased risk of SGA among underweight and normal weight women, while interpregnancy weight loss exceeding 2 BMI units was associated with reduced risk of recurrent preeclampsia among overweight and obese women.

Conclusion Even small changes in interpregnancy weight may significantly affect pregnancy outcomes among formerly preeclamptic women. Appropriate weight management between pregnancies has the potential to attenuate such risks.

Key Points

  • Interpregnancy weight change among formerly preeclamptic women significantly affects pregnancy outcomes.

  • Interpregnancy weight gain is associated with increased risk of recurrent preeclampsia, large-for-gestational-age and cesarean delivery.

  • Interpregnancy weight loss is associated with increased risk of small-for-gestational age and recurrent preeclampsia.

Keywords

interpregnancy - preeclampsia - pregnancy outcomes - weight change


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Februar 2020

Angenommen: 03. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Juni 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 77 (01) 67-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gynecologists TACoOa. ACOG practice bulletin no. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (01) e1-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jeyabalan A. Epidemiology of preeclampsia: impact of obesity. Nutr Rev 2013; 71 (Suppl. 01) S18-S25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Main EK, McCain CL, Morton CH, Holtby S, Lawton ES. Pregnancy-related mortality in California: causes, characteristics, and improvement opportunities. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (04) 938-947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dhariwal NK, Lynde GC. Update in the management of patients with preeclampsia. Anesthesiol Clin 2017; 35 (01) 95-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chang JJ, Muglia LJ, Macones GA. Association of early-onset pre-eclampsia in first pregnancy with normotensive second pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. BJOG 2010; 117 (08) 946-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Palatnik A, Grobman WA, Miller ES. Is a history of preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of a small for gestational age infant in a future pregnancy?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (03) 355.e1-355.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lo JO, Mission JF, Caughey AB. Hypertensive disease of pregnancy and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25 (02) 124-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Amaral LM, Cunningham Jr MW, Cornelius DC, LaMarca B. Preeclampsia: long-term consequences for vascular health. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2015; 11: 403-415
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mulder EG, Ghossein-Doha C, Froeling MFEM, van Kuijk SMJ, Spaanderman MEA. Recurrence rates of preeclampsia over the past 20 years in women assessed for non-pregnant cardiovascular risk factors. Pregnancy Hypertens 2018; 14: 150-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van Oostwaard MF, Langenveld J, Schuit E. et al. Recurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an individual patient data metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (05) 624.e1-624.e17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Barton JR, Sibai BM. Prediction and prevention of recurrent preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (2 Pt 1): 359-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 ACOG. Low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy. ACOG committee opinion number 743. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (01) e44-e52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Office of Research on Women's Health NIoH. Moving into the future with new dimensions and strategies: a vision for 2020 for women's health research. In: Services USDoHaH, 2010; Accessed May 16, 2020 at: https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sites/orwh/files/docs/ORWH_StrategicPlan2020_Vol1.pdf
    PubMed
  • 15 Mostello D, Jen Chang J, Allen J, Luehr L, Shyken J, Leet T. Recurrent preeclampsia: the effect of weight change between pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (03) 667-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cnattingius S, Wikström AK, Stephansson O, Johansson K. The impact of small for gestational age births in early and late preeclamptic pregnancies for preeclampsia recurrence: a cohort study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2016; 30 (06) 563-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Oteng-Ntim E, Mononen S, Sawicki O, Seed PT, Bick D, Poston L. Interpregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 8 (06) e018778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Benjamin RH, Littlejohn S, Canfield MA, Ethen MK, Hua F, Mitchell LE. Interpregnancy change in body mass index and infant outcomes in Texas: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19 (01) 119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lynes C, McLain AC, Yeung EH, Albert P, Liu J, Boghossian NS. Interpregnancy weight change and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Epidemiol 2017; 27 (10) 632-637.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 McBain RD, Dekker GA, Clifton VL, Mol BW, Grzeskowiak LE. Impact of inter-pregnancy BMI change on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 205: 98-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Horgan GW. Inter-pregnancy weight change and the risk of recurrent pregnancy complications. PLoS One 2016; 11 (05) e0154812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Herman AA, McCarthy BJ, Bakewell JM. et al. Data linkage methods used in maternally-linked birth and infant death surveillance data sets from the United States (Georgia, Missouri, Utah and Washington State), Israel, Norway, Scotland and Western Australia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11 (Suppl. 01) 5-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 March of Dimes. PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. In: Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE. eds. Genève, Switzerland: Health Organization Geneva; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 24 WHO. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Rev 10.1992;1 and 2, ICD-10. Geneva: WHO. Accessed May 16, 2020 at: https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD10Volume2_en_2010.pdf
    PubMed
  • 25 Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J 1999; 3 (04) 225-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138 (11) 923-936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kotelchuck M. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (09) 1486-1489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ananth CV. Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21 (Suppl. 02) 22-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bogaerts A, Van den Bergh BR, Ameye L. et al. Interpregnancy weight change and risk for adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 999-1009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Villamor E, Cnattingius S. Interpregnancy weight change and risk of preterm delivery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016; 24 (03) 727-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 1985; 4 (01) 87-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Stepniewska KA, Altman DG. Non-parametric test for trend across ordered groups. Stata Technical Bulletin 9: 21–22 reprinted in stata technical bulletin reprints, vol 2, p 169 College Station, TX: Stata Press; 1992 Accessed May 16, 2020 at: https://www.stata.com/products/stb/journals/stb9.pdf
    PubMed
  • 34 (WHO) WHO. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic (WHO technical report series no 894). Geneva: WHO; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Hutcheon JA, Bodnar LM. Good practices for observational studies of maternal weight and weight gain in pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2018; 32 (02) 152-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Abrams B, Himes KP, Simhan HN, Bodnar LM. A weight-gain-for-gestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 97 (05) 1062-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lopez-Jaramillo P, Barajas J, Rueda-Quijano SM, Lopez-Lopez C, Felix C. Obesity and preeclampsia: common pathophysiological mechanisms. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 1838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wolf M, Kettyle E, Sandler L, Ecker JL, Roberts J, Thadhani R. Obesity and preeclampsia: the potential role of inflammation. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98 (5 Pt 1): 757-762
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fogarty AW, Glancy C, Jones S, Lewis SA, McKeever TM, Britton JR. A prospective study of weight change and systemic inflammation over 9 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87 (01) 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Girouard J, Giguère Y, Moutquin JM, Forest JC. Previous hypertensive disease of pregnancy is associated with alterations of markers of insulin resistance. Hypertension 2007; 49 (05) 1056-1062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Forsythe LK, Wallace JM, Livingstone MB. Obesity and inflammation: the effects of weight loss. Nutr Res Rev 2008; 21 (02) 117-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Jain AP, Gavard JA, Rice JJ, Catanzaro RB, Artal R, Hopkins SA. The impact of interpregnancy weight change on birthweight in obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (03) 205.e1-205.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Villamor E, Cnattingius S. Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Lancet 2006; 368 (9542): 1164-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Getahun D, Kaminsky LM, Elsasser DA, Kirby RS, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (04) 376.e1-376.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Horgan GW. Inter-pregnancy weight change impacts placental weight and is associated with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the second pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Chen A, Klebanoff MA, Basso O. Pre-pregnancy body mass index change between pregnancies and preterm birth in the following pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23 (03) 207-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Whiteman VE, Rao K, Duan J, Alio A, Marty PJ, Salihu HM. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of preterm phenotypes. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28 (01) 67-74
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371 (9606): 75-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Masho SW, Bishop DL, Munn M. Pre-pregnancy BMI and weight gain: where is the tipping point for preterm birth?. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Sampat DP. et al. Evaluation of the sensitivity and accuracy of birth defects indicators on the 2003 revision of the U.S. birth certificate: has data quality improved?. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2017; 31 (01) 67-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Chavez MR, Kirby RS, Getahun D, Vintzileos AM. Recurrence of ischemic placental disease. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110 (01) 128-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Lederman SA, Paxton A. Maternal reporting of prepregnancy weight and birth outcome: consistency and completeness compared with the clinical record. Matern Child Health J 1998; 2 (02) 123-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McDermott J, Drews C, Green D, Berg C. Evaluation of prenatal care information on birth certificates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11 (01) 105-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Jurek AM, Greenland S. Adjusting for multiple-misclassified variables in a study using birth certificates. Ann Epidemiol 2013; 23 (08) 515-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bodnar LM, Abrams B, Bertolet M. et al. Validity of birth certificate-derived maternal weight data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014; 28 (03) 203-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Reichman NE, Schwartz-Soicher O. Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (01) 32.e1-32.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Haghighat N, Hu M, Laurent O, Chung J, Nguyen P, Wu J. Comparison of birth certificates and hospital-based birth data on pregnancy complications in Los Angeles and Orange County, California. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar