CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(06): 702-707
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713163
Artigo Original
Coluna

Description of the Sacropelvic Parameters Measurement Method for S2-alar iliac Screw Insertion

Article in several languages: português | English
1   Departamento de Biomecânica, Medicina e Reabilitação do Aparelho Locomotor System, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
,
1   Departamento de Biomecânica, Medicina e Reabilitação do Aparelho Locomotor System, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
,
1   Departamento de Biomecânica, Medicina e Reabilitação do Aparelho Locomotor System, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
,
1   Departamento de Biomecânica, Medicina e Reabilitação do Aparelho Locomotor System, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Description of the sacropelvic parameters measurement method for S2-alar iliac (S2AI) screw insertion.

Methods Descriptive study of the method for measuring sacropelvic parameters for the insertion of the S2AI screw using computed tomography (CT). The data evaluated in multiplanar reconstructions were the parameters of the screw trajectory, including length, diameter and angles of the trajectory in the axial and sagittal planes.

Results From the sagittal reconstruction, the axis of the series of axial slices is angled three-dimensionally so that it is possible to visualize the S2 vertebra, the screw entry point, and the anteroinferior iliac spine (AIIS) in the same plane. The entry point is demarcated at the midpoint between the dorsal foramina of S1 and S2. To measure the length of the screw, lines are drawn tangent to the inner and outer cortices of the iliac. The diameter is determined by the shortest distance between the inner and outer iliac faces minus half of the diameter of the screw chosen medially and laterally. The path angle in the axial plane is formed by the anteroposterior midline of the sacrum and the line of the screw length. The craniocaudal inclination angle in relation to the S1 plateau corresponds to the degree of inclination made in the sagittal plane to find the image in which the entry point and the AIIS are seen in the same plane.

Conclusion It was possible to adequately assess, through multiplanar CT reconstructions, the sacropelvic parameters necessary for the safe insertion of the S2AI screw.



Publication History

Received: 24 August 2019

Accepted: 20 February 2020

Article published online:
22 July 2020

© 2020. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referências

  • 1 OʼBrien JR, Yu W, Kaufman BE. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (20) E1250-E1255
  • 2 Chang TL, Sponseller PD, Kebaish KM, Fishman EK. Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (05) 436-440
  • 3 Kwan MK, Jeffry A, Chan CYW, Saw LB. A radiological evaluation of the morphometry and safety of S1, S2 and S2-ilium screws in the Asian population using three dimensional computed tomography scan: an analysis of 180 pelvis. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34 (03) 217-227
  • 4 O'Brien JR, Matteini L, Yu WD, Kebaish KM. Feasibility of minimally invasive sacropelvic fixation: percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35 (04) 460-464
  • 5 Burns CB, Dua K, Trasolini NA, Komatsu DE, Barsi JM. Biomechanical Comparison of Spinopelvic Fixation Constructs: Iliac Screw Versus S2-Alar-Iliac Screw. Spine Deform 2016; 4 (01) 10-15
  • 6 Matteini LE, Kebaish KM, Volk WR, Bergin PF, Yu WD, O'Brien JR. An S-2 alar iliac pelvic fixation. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28 (03) E13
  • 7 Nottmeier EW, Pirris SM, Balseiro S, Fenton D. Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation. Spine J 2010; 10 (07) 595-601
  • 8 Hoernschemeyer DG, Pashuck TD, Pfeiffer FM. Analysis of the s2 alar-iliac screw as compared with the traditional iliac screw: does it increase stability with sacroiliac fixation of the spine?. Spine J 2017; 17 (06) 875-879
  • 9 Wu AM, Chen D, Chen CH. et al. The technique of S2-alar- iliac screw fixation: a literature review. AME Med J 2017; 2: 179
  • 10 O'Brien JR, Yu WD, Bhatnagar R, Sponseller P, Kebaish KM. An anatomic study of the S2 iliac technique for lumbopelvic screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (12) E439-E442
  • 11 Jost GF, Walti J, Mariani L, Cattin P. A novel approach to navigated implantation of S-2 alar iliac screws using inertial measurement units. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 24 (03) 447-453
  • 12 Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho KJ, Edwards II CC, Rinella AS. Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (04) 721-728
  • 13 Kebaish KM. Sacropelvic fixation: techniques and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35 (25) 2245-2251
  • 14 Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS. Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27 (07) 776-786
  • 15 Edwards II CC, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG. Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29 (18) 1996-2005
  • 16 Klineberg E, McHenry T, Bellabarba C, Wagner T, Chapman J. Sacral insufficiency fractures caudal to instrumented posterior lumbosacral arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33 (16) 1806-1811
  • 17 Leong JC, Lu WW, Zheng Y, Zhu Q, Zhong S. Comparison of the strengths of lumbosacral fixation achieved with techniques using one and two triangulated sacral screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23 (21) 2289-2294
  • 18 Ilyas H, Place H, Puryear A. A Comparison of Early Clinical and Radiographic Complications of Iliac Screw Fixation Versus S2 Alar Iliac (S2AI) Fixation in the Adult and Pediatric Populations. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015; 28 (04) E199-E205
  • 19 Elder BD, Ishida W, Lo SL. et al. Use of S2-Alar-iliac Screws Associated With Less Complications Than Iliac Screws in Adult Lumbosacropelvic Fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42 (03) E142-E149
  • 20 Gupta S, Smith E, Falk D, O'Brien J. S2 alar-iliac screws versus iliac screws for pelvic fixation. AME Med J 2017; 2: 58
  • 21 Ray WZ, Ravindra VM, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. Stereotactic navigation with the O-arm for placement of S-2 alar iliac screws in pelvic lumbar fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2013; 18 (05) 490-495
  • 22 Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA. S2 alar iliac screw placement under robotic guidance for adult spinal deformity patients: technical note. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (08) 2198-2203
  • 23 El Dafrawy MH, Kebaish KM. Percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation for pelvic insufficiency fracture. Orthopedics 2014; 37 (11) e1033-e1035
  • 24 Bederman SS, Hahn P, Colin V, Kiester PD, Bhatia NN. Robotic Guidance for S2-Alar-Iliac Screws in Spinal Deformity Correction. Clin Spine Surg 2017; 30 (01) E49-E53
  • 25 Mirkovic S, Abitbol JJ, Steinman J. et al. Anatomic consideration for sacral screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991; 16 (6, Suppl) S289-S294
  • 26 Zhu F, Bao HD, Yuan S. et al. Posterior second sacral alar iliac screw insertion: anatomic study in a Chinese population. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (07) 1683-1689