J Knee Surg 2020; 33(12): 1172-1179
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714366
Special Focus Section

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplants in the Knee: Bipolar and Beyond

1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
2   Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
James T. Stannard
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
2   Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Anna J. Schreiner
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
2   Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
3   BG Center for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Knee patients who have sustained chondral and osteochondral lesions suffer from debilitating pain, which can ultimately lead to posttraumatic osteoarthritis and whole-joint disease. Older, nonactive patients are traditionally steered toward total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but younger, active patients are not good candidates for TKA based on implant longevity, complications, morbidity, and risk for revision, such that treatment strategies at restoring missing hyaline cartilage and bone are highly desired for this patient population. Over the past four decades, fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has been developed as a treatment method for large (> 2.5 cm2) focal full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. This article documents our own institutional OCA journey since 2016 through enhanced graft preservation techniques (the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System, or MOPS), technical improvements in surgical techniques, use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate, bioabsorbable pins and nails, and prescribed and monitored patient-specific rehabilitation protocols. Further follow-up with documentation of long-term outcomes will provide insight for continued optimization for future applications for OCA transplantation, potentially including a broader spectrum of patients appropriate for this treatment. Ongoing translational research is necessary to blaze the trail in further optimizing this treatment option for patients.

Authors' Contributions

All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript. J. P. S., J. T. S., and A. J. S.: substantial contributions to research design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; J. P. S., J. T. S., and A. J. S.: drafting the paper and revising it critically; all authors approved the submitted and final versions.




Publication History

Received: 21 April 2020

Accepted: 08 June 2020

Article published online:
20 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Vina ER, Kwoh CK. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: literature update. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018; 30 (02) 160-167
  • 2 Inacio MCS, Paxton EW, Graves SE, Namba RS, Nemes S. Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States - an alternative projection model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25 (11) 1797-1803
  • 3 Chahal J, Gross AE, Gross C. et al. Outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (03) 575-588
  • 4 Familiari F, Cinque ME, Chahla J. et al. Clinical outcomes and failure rates of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (14) 3541-3549
  • 5 Stoker AM, Stannard JP, Kuroki K, Bozynski CC, Pfeiffer FM, Cook JL. Validation of the Missouri Osteochondral Allograft Preservation System for the maintenance of osteochondral allograft quality during prolonged storage. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (01) 58-65
  • 6 Stannard JP, Cook JL. Prospective assessment of outcomes after primary unipolar, multisurface, and bipolar osteochondral allograft transplantations in the knee: a comparison of two preservation methods. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (06) 1356-1364
  • 7 Schreiner AJ, Stannard JP, Cook CR. et al. Comparison of meniscal allograft transplantation techniques using a preclinical canine model. J Orthop Res 2020; ; Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1002/jor.24668.
  • 8 Rucinski K, Cook JL, Crecelius CR, Stucky R, Stannard JP. Effects of compliance with procedure-specific postoperative rehabilitation protocols on initial outcomes after osteochondral and meniscal allograft transplantation in the knee. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (11) 2325967119884291
  • 9 Kuroki K, Stoker AM, Stannard JP. et al. Biologic joint repair strategies: the Mizzou BioJoint story. Toxicol Pathol 2017; 45 (07) 931-938
  • 10 Sherman SL, Garrity J, Bauer K, Cook J, Stannard J, Bugbee W. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for the knee: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22 (02) 121-133
  • 11 Cook JL, Stoker AM, Stannard JP. et al. A novel system improves preservation of osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3404-3414
  • 12 Baumann CA, Baumann JR, Bozynski CC, Stoker AM, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Comparison of techniques for preimplantation treatment of osteochondral allograft bone. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (01) 97-104
  • 13 Stoker AM, Baumann CA, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate versus platelet rich plasma to enhance osseous integration potential for osteochondral allografts. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (04) 314-320
  • 14 Hayden R, Rucinski K, Crecelius CR, Stucky R, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Outcomes associated with behavioral evaluation and counseling for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery - a systematic review. J Orthop 2020; 21: 178-182
  • 15 Melugin HP, Bernard CD, Camp CL, Saris DBF, Krych AJ. Bipolar cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review of techniques, outcomes, and complications. Cartilage 2019; •••: 1947603519855761
  • 16 Zouzias IC, Bugbee WD. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2016; 24 (02) 79-84
  • 17 Chui K, Jeys L, Snow M. Knee salvage procedures: the indications, techniques and outcomes of large osteochondral allografts. World J Orthop 2015; 6 (03) 340-350
  • 18 Crawford ZT, Schumaier AP, Glogovac G, Grawe BM. Return to sport and sports-specific outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee: a systematic review of studies with at least 2 years' mean follow-up. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (06) 1880-1889
  • 19 Meric G, Gracitelli GC, Görtz S, De Young AJ, Bugbee WD. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for bipolar reciprocal osteochondral lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 709-714
  • 20 Beaver RJ, Mahomed M, Backstein D, Davis A, Zukor DJ, Gross AE. Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic defects in the knee. A survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74 (01) 105-110
  • 21 Giannini S, Buda R, Ruffilli A. et al. Failures in bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft for the treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (07) 2081-2089
  • 22 Getgood A, Gelber J, Görtz S, De Young A, Bugbee W. Combined osteochondral allograft and meniscal allograft transplantation: a survivorship analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (04) 946-953
  • 23 Cotter EJ, Hannon CP, Christian DR. et al. Clinical outcomes of multifocal osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee: An analysis of overlapping grafts and multifocal lesions. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (12) 2884-2893
  • 24 Krettek C, Clausen J, Omar M, Noack S, Neunaber C. Two-stage late reconstruction with a fresh large osteochondral shell allograft transplantation (FLOCSAT) for a large ostechondral defect in a non-union after a lateral tibia plateau fracture 2-year follow up. Injury 2017; 48 (07) 1309-1318
  • 25 Krettek C, Clausen JD, Bruns N, Neunaber C. Partial and complete joint transplantation with fresh osteochondral allografts-the FLOCSAT concept [in German]. Unfallchirurg 2017; 120 (11) 932-949
  • 26 Krettek C, Clausen JD, Neunaber C. Complex joint reconstruction and joint transplantation with the FLOCSAT concept-planning and surgical implementation [in German]. Unfallchirurg 2017; 120 (11) 950-960
  • 27 Assenmacher AT, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Macalena JA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: a systematic review at long-term follow-up of 12.3 years. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2160-2168
  • 28 Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP. et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017; 389 (10077): 1424-1430
  • 29 Oladeji LO, Cook JL, Stannard JP, Crist BD. Large fresh osteochondral allografts for the hip: growing the evidence. Hip Int 2018; 28 (03) 284-290
  • 30 Oladeji LO, Stannard JP, Cook CR. et al. Effects of autogenous bone marrow aspirate concentrate on radiographic integration of femoral condylar osteochondral allografts. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (12) 2797-2803