CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2021; 08(01): 003-011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715354
Review Article

Radiation Concerns for the Neuroanesthesiologists

Sourav Burman
1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Abanti Das
2   Department of Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Charu Mahajan
1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

With the advent of minimally invasive neurosurgical techniques and rapid innovations in the field of neurointervention, there has been a sharp rise in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities requiring radiation exposure. Neuroanesthesiologists are currently involved in various procedures inside as well as outside the operating room (OR) like intensive care units, interventional suites, and gamma knife units. The ambit expands from short-lasting diagnostic scans to lengthy therapeutic procedures performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Hence, a modern-day neuroanesthesiologist has to bear the brunt of the radiation exposure in both inside and outside the OR. However, obliviousness and nonadherence to the relevant radiation safety measures are still prevalent. Radiation protection and safety are topics that need to be discussed with new vigor in the light of current practice.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Dezember 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Maghsoudi B, Mortazavi SMJ, Khademi S, Vatankhah P. Evaluation of radiation exposure pattern and radiation absorbed dose resulting from occupational exposure of anesthesiologists to ionizing radiation. J Biomed Phys Eng 2017; 7 (03) 271-278
  • 2 Henderson KH, Lu JK, Strauss KJ, Treves ST, Rockoff MA. Radiation exposure of anesthesiologists. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6 (01) 37-41
  • 3 Cheon BK, Kim CL, Kim KR. et al. Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management. Korean J Pain 2018; 31 (04) 244-252
  • 4 Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O, Goldstein JA. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111 (09) 1368-1372
  • 5 Tüfek A, Tokgöz O, Aycan IÖ, Çelik F, Gümüş A. Current attitudes of Turkish anesthesiologists to radiation exposure. J Anesth 2013; 27 (06) 874-878
  • 6 Anastasian ZH, Strozyk D, Meyers PM, Wang S, Berman MF. Radiation exposure of the anesthesiologist in the neurointerventional suite. Anesthesiology 2011; 114 (03) 512-520
  • 7 Ismail S, Khan F, Sultan N, Naqvi M. Radiation exposure to anaesthetists during interventional radiology. Anaesthesia 2010; 65 (01) 54-60
  • 8 The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37 (2-4) 1-332
  • 9 Dagal A. Radiation safety for anesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24 (04) 445-450
  • 10 Michel R, Perle SC. Effective dose equivalent estimates in diagnostic radiology with single dosimetry. Health Phys 2000; 79 (2, Suppl) S17-S19
  • 11 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Use of personal monitors to estimate effective dose equivalent and effective dose to workers for external exposure to low-LET radiation. NCRP Report No. 122. Bethesda MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 1995
  • 12 Dendy PP. Radiation risks in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol 2008; 81 (961) 1-7
  • 13 Gilbert ES. Ionising radiation and cancer risks: what have we learned from epidemiology?. Int J Radiat Biol 2009; 85 (06) 467-482
  • 14 Kincaid OW. The problem of repeated exposure to radiation by anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1958; 37 (06) 361-370
  • 15 Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Moss TL, Rivera J, Pampati V. Risk of whole body radiation exposure and protective measures in fluoroscopically guided interventional techniques: a prospective evaluation. BMC Anesthesiol 2003; 3 (01) 2
  • 16 Valentin J. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2000; 30 (02) 7-67
  • 17 International Commission on Radiological Protection. Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation. Adopted by the ICRP and ICRU in September 1995. Ann ICRP 1996; 26 (3-4) 1-205
  • 18 Pradeepkumar KS, Sharma DN, Khushwaha HS. Philosophy and principles of radiation protection, security of radioactive sources and preparedness for response to radiological emergencies. Barc Newsletter 2006; 1 (275) 1-29
  • 19 World Health Organization. Efficacy and Radiation Safety in Interventional Radiology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2000
  • 20 Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB. et al. American College of Cardiology. Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37 (08) 2170-2214
  • 21 Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G. et al. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, Society of Interventional Radiology. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 (02) 230-239
  • 22 Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S. et al. Joint Inter-Society Task Force on Occupational Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (02) 147-152
  • 23 Nelson EM, Monazzam SM, Kim KD, Seibert JA, Klineberg EO. Intraoperative fluoroscopy, portable X-ray, and CT: patient and operating room personnel radiation exposure in spinal surgery. Spine J 2014; 14 (12) 2985-2991
  • 24 Christodoulou EG, Goodsitt MM, Larson SC, Darner KL, Satti J, Chan HP. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter. Med Phys 2003; 30 (06) 1033-1038
  • 25 Luchs JS, Rosioreanu A, Gregorius D, Venkataramanan N, Koehler V, Ortiz AO. Radiation safety during spine interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (01) 107-111
  • 26 Pitteloud N, Gamulin A, Barea C, Damet J, Racloz G, Sans-Merce M. Radiation exposure using the O-arm® surgical imaging system. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (03) 651-657
  • 27 Scarone P, Vincenzo G, Distefano D. et al. Use of the Airo mobile intraoperative CT system versus the O-arm for transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study of 263 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 29 (04) 397-406
  • 28 Ulmer S, Schulz E, Moeller B. et al. Radiation dose of the lens in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: pros and cons of a conventional setup using fluoroscopic guidance and CT-based neuronavigation. Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28 (08) 1559-1564
  • 29 Yu E, Khan SN. Does less invasive spine surgery result in increased radiation exposure? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (06) 1738-1748
  • 30 Narain AS, Hijji FY, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Haws BE, Singh K. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. World J Orthop 2017; 8 (07) 524-530
  • 31 Rumboldt Z, Huda W, All JW. Review of portable CT with assessment of a dedicated head CT scanner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30 (09) 1630-1636
  • 32 Detorie N, Mahesh M, Schueler BA. Reducing occupational exposure from fluoroscopy. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4 (05) 335-337
  • 33 Thomton FJ, Paulson EK, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP, Nelson RC. Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles. Acad Radiol 2003; 10 (04) 379-385
  • 34 Pennington Z, Cottrill E, Westbroek EM. et al. Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature. Spine J 2019; 19 (08) 1397-1411
  • 35 Hayashi N, Sakai T, Kitagawa M. et al. Radiation exposure to interventional radiologists during manual-injection digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998; 21 (03) 240-243
  • 36 Okamoto K, Ito J, Sakai K, Yoshimura S. The principle of digital subtraction angiography and radiological protection. Interv Neuroradiol 2000; 6 (Suppl 1) 25-31
  • 37 Telischak NA, Heit JJ, Campos LW, Choudhri OA, Do HM, Qian X. Fluoroscopic C-arm and CT-guided selective radiofrequency ablation for trigeminal and glossopharyngeal facial pain syndromes. Pain Med 2018; 19 (01) 130-141
  • 38 Braun E, Sack AM, Sayed D. et al. Reducing radiation exposure in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with pulsed fluoroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Pain Physician 2018; 21 (01) 53-60
  • 39 Fan Chiang CY, Tsai TT, Chen LH. et al. Computed tomography-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Chang Gung Med J 2012; 35 (04) 332-338
  • 40 Xie Z, Liao X, Kang Y, Zhang J, Jia L. Radiation exposure to staff in intensive care unit with portable CT scanner. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 5656480
  • 41 McTyre E, Helis CA, Farris M. et al. Emerging indications for fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2017; 80 (02) 210-216
  • 42 Koga T, Shin M, Saito N. Role ofknife radiosurgery in neurosurgery: past and future perspectives. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010; 50 (09) 737-748
  • 43 Miller DC, Patel J, Smith CC. Spine Intervention Society’s Patient Safety Committee. Fact finders for patient safety: radiation safety for interventional spine procedures. Pain Med 2018; 19 (03) 629-630
  • 44 Dromi S, Wood BJ, Oberoi J, Neeman Z. Heavy metal pad shielding during fluoroscopic interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (07) 1201-1206
  • 45 Delichas M, Psarrakos K, Molyvda-Athanassopoulou E. et al. Radiation exposure to cardiologists performing interventional cardiology procedures. Eur J Radiol 2003; 48 (03) 268-273
  • 46 Marichal DA, Anwar T, Kirsch D. et al. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (04) 437-442
  • 47 Schueler BA, Vrieze TJ, Bjarnason H, Stanson AW. An investigation of operator exposure in interventional radiology. Radiographics 2006; 26 (05) 1533-1541
  • 48 Haussen DC, Van Der Bom IM, Nogueira RG. A prospective case control comparison of the ZeroGravity system versus a standard lead apron as radiation protection strategy in neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (10) 1052-1055
  • 49 Lichliter A, Weir V, Heithaus RE. et al. Clinical evaluation of protective garments with respect to garment characteristics and manufacturer label information. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (01) 148-155
  • 50 Pasciak AS, Jones AK. Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014; 15 (06) 5002
  • 51 Karadag B, Ikitimur B, Durmaz E. et al. Effectiveness of a lead cap in radiation protection of the head in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. EuroIntervention 2013; 9 (06) 754-756
  • 52 International Electrotechnical Commission Report 60601. Medical electrical equipment 2000; Part 2–43: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for interventional procedures. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 53 Multimedia and audio-visual radiation protection training in interventional radiology (MARTIR), radiation protection 119. European Commission; 2002. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/wcm/nuclear/cd_rom_martir_ project.zip
  • 54 IAEA. Diagnostic and interventional radiology. Available at: http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/AdditionalResources/Training/1_TrainingMaterial/Radiology.htm. A training documentation regarding radiation protection from the IAEA. Accessed March 1, 2020