Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2021; 08(02): 92-98
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715709
Original Article

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Prone Positioning Methods on Blood Loss and 
Intra-Abdominal Pressure in Obese Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery

Sandeep Kundra
1   Department of Anesthesia, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
,
Hanish Bansal
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
,
Vishnu Gupta
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Fortis Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
,
Rekha Gupta
4   Department of Anesthesia, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Sandeep Kaushal
5   Department of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
,
Anju Grewal
1   Department of Anesthesia, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
,
Ashwani K. Chaudhary
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract:

Background Improper prone positioning of obese patients for spine surgery can increase the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), resulting in increased bleeding from epidural venous plexus. The choice of prone positioning frame can be an important determinant of the IAP.

Materials and Methods This prospective, randomized study was performed on obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30) scheduled for lumbar laminectomy. After administration of general anesthesia, patients were positioned prone either on Wilson’s frame (group W), or on horizontal bolsters (group H). IAP was recorded at three intervals: (1) in supine position, (2) 10 minutes after prone positioning, and (3) in prone position at the end of surgery. Intraoperative blood loss was measured quantitatively and assessed subjectively by the surgeon.

Results A total of 60 patients were enrolled with 30 patients in each group. IAP in supine position was similar in both groups. However, IAP 10 minutes after prone positioning was significantly higher at 11.44 ± 1.61 mm Hg in group W as compared to 9.56 ± 1.92 mm Hg in group H (p = 0.001). Similarly, IAP of 12.24 ± 1.45 mm Hg in group W, measured on completion of surgery was significantly higher than 
9.96 ± 2.35 mm Hg in group H (p = 0.001). Mean total blood loss of 440.40 ± 176.98 mL in group W was significantly higher than 317.20 ± 91.04 mL in group H (p = 0.003).

Conclusion Obese patients positioned prone on Wilson’s frame had significantly higher IAP and blood loss compared to patients positioned on horizontal bolsters.

Keywords

prone position - spinal fusion - spine surgery - intra-abdominal pressure - Wilson’s frame


Publication History

Article published online:
07 September 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Rozet I, Vavilala MS. Risks and benefits of patient positioning during neurosurgical care. Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 25 (03) 631-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Park CK. The effect of patient positioning on intraabdominal pressure and blood loss in spinal surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91 (03) 552-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Relton JE, Hall JE. An operation frame for spinal fusion. A new apparatus designed to reduce haemorrhage during operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967; 49 (02) 327-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Han IH, Son DW, Nam KH, Choi BK, Song GS. The effect of body mass index on intra-abdominal pressure and blood loss in lumbar spine surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 51 (02) 81-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Smit M, Werner MJ, Lansink-Hartgring AO, Dieperink W, Zijlstra JG, van Meurs M. How central obesity influences intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective, observational study in cardiothoracic surgical patients. Ann Intensive Care 2016; 
6 (01) 99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rigamonti A, Gemma M, Rocca A, Messina M, Bignami E, 
Beretta L. Prone versus knee-chest position for microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study of intra-abdominal pressure and intraoperative bleeding. Spine 2005; 30 (17) 1918-1923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Malhotra A, Gupta V, Abraham M, Punetha P, Bundela Y. Quantifying the amount of bleeding and associated changes in intra-abdominal pressure and mean airway pressure in patients undergoing lumbar fixation surgeries: a comparison of three positioning systems. Asian Spine J 2016; 10 (02) 199-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kron IL, Harman PK, Nolan SP. The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration. Ann Surg 1984; 199 (01) 28-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Guanciale AF, Dinsay JM, Watkins RG. Lumbar lordosis in spinal fusion. A comparison of intraoperative results of patient positioning on two different operative table frame types. Spine 1996; 21 (08) 964-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Regli A, Pelosi P, Malbrain MLNG. Ventilation in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: what every critical care physician needs to know. Ann Intensive Care 2019; 9 (01) 52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Magni G, Rosa IL, Melillo G, Savio A, Rosa G. A comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg 2009; 109 (02) 567-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nightingale CE, Margarson MP, Shearer E. et al Members of the Working Party; Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain; Ireland Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia. Peri-operative management of the obese surgical patient 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2015; 70 (07) 859-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fusco MA, Martin RS, Chang MC. Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. J Trauma 2001; 50 (02) 297-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sanchez NC, Tenofsky PL, Dort JM, Shen LY, Helmer SD, 
Smith RS. What is normal intra-abdominal pressure?. Am Surg 2001; 67 (03) 243-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wilson A, Longhi J, Goldman C, McNatt S. Intra-abdominal pressure and the morbidly obese patients: the effect of body mass index. J Trauma 2010; 69 (01) 78-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Palmon SC, Kirsch JR, Depper JA, Toung TJ. The effect of the prone position on pulmonary mechanics is frame-dependent. Anesth Analg 1998; 87 (05) 1175-1180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Edgcombe H, Carter K, Yarrow S. Anaesthesia in the prone position. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100 (02) 165-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schonauer C, Bocchetti A, Barbagallo G, Albanese V, Moraci A. Positioning on surgical table. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 (01) (suppl 1) 
S50-S55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Aono H, Ohwada T, Hosono N. et al Incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma in spinal decompression surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 (02) 202-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Batson OV. The function of vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastases. Ann Surg 1940; 112 (01) 138-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Sztern B. An overview of blood-sparing techniques used in spine surgery during the perioperative period. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 (1, Suppl 1) S18-S27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar