Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider in Curved Canals

Gabriela Behne Miró; Flávia Sens Fagundes Tomazinho; Edson Pelisser; Mariana Maciel Batista Borges; Marco Antônio Hungaro Duarte; Rodrigo Ricci Vivan; Flares Baratto-Filho

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1715780

European Journal of Dentistry, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(04): 639-643
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715780

Original Article

Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider in Curved Canals

Gabriela Behne Miró

¹School of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

,

Flávia Sens Fagundes Tomazinho

¹School of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

,

Edson Pelisser

¹School of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

,

Mariana Maciel Batista Borges

²Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil

,

Marco Antônio Hungaro Duarte

²Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil

,

Rodrigo Ricci Vivan

²Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil

,

Flares Baratto-Filho

¹School of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

³Department of Dentistry, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the volume variation and maintenance of the root canal position when using the ProGlider 16.02 (PG) and the WaveOne Gold Glider 15.02 (WOGG) file systems for glide path preparation.

Materials and Methods Twenty-four moderately curved mesiobuccal canals of maxil-lary first molars were selected and randomly divided into two groups: PG and WOGG. The selected teeth were scanned using microtomography before and after root canal preparation to assess centralization and linear transport at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apical foramen.

Statistical Analysis The data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. The level of significance was 5%.

Results There were no significant differences in volume variation or root canal transport (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the centralization of the root canal at 3 mm from the foramen (p < 0.05).

Conclusions WOGG and PG instruments presented similar results regarding the root canal volume increase and transport. WOGG caused higher decentralization at 3 mm from the apical foramen.

Keywords

canal transportation - centralization - endodontic - ProGlider - WaveOne Gold Glider

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. J Endod 2014; 40 (12) 2053-2056
2 Jatahy Ferreira do Amaral RO, Leonardi DP, Gabardo MC, Coelho BS, Oliveira KV, Baratto Filho F. Influence of cervical and apical enlargement associated with the WaveOne system on the transportation and centralization of endodontic preparations. J Endod 2016; 42 (04) 626-631
3 Kirchhoff AL, Chu R, Mello I, Garzon AD, dos Santos M, Cunha RS. Glide path management with single- and multiple-instrument rotary systems in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2015; 41 (11) 1880-1883
4 Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A. et al. Use of nickel-titanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009; 35 (03) 408-412
5 Pasqualini D, Bianchi CC, Paolino DS. et al. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals. J Endod 2012; 38 (03) 389-393
6 De-Deus G, Arruda TE, Souza EM. et al. The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path. Int Endod J 2013; 46 (10) 993-998
7 Paleker F, van der Vyver PJ. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of K-files, ProGlider File, and G-Files: a micro-computed tomography study of curved root canals. J Endod 2016; 42 (07) 1105-1109
8 Maniglia-Ferreira C, de Almeida Gomes F, Ximenes T. et al. Influence of reuse and cervical preflaring on the fracture strength of reciprocating instruments. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (01) 41-47
9 Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F. Canal transportation and centering ability of WaveOne Gold in combination with and without different glide path techniques. J Endod 2018; 44 (09) 1430-1435
10 de Carvalho GM, Sponchiado Junior EC, Garrido AD, Lia RC, Garcia LdaF, Marques AA. Apical transportation, centering ability, and cleaning effectiveness of reciprocating single-file system associated with different glide path techniques. J Endod 2015; 41 (12) 2045-2049
11 Troiano G, Dioguardi M, Cocco A, Zhurakivska K, Ciavarella D, Muzio LL. Increase in [corrected] the glyde path diameter improves the centering ability of F6 Skytaper. [published correction appears in Eur J Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):467] Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (01) 89-93
12 Al-Sudani D, Plotino G, Grande N, Rengo S, Simeone M. Cyclic fatigue of glide path rotary NiTi files in a double (S-Shaped) simulated curvature. Dentistry 2016; 6: 1-3
13 Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015; 41 (04) 535-538
14 Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L. et al. Micro-CT evaluation of several glide path techniques and ProTaper Next shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals. Int Endod J 2017; 50 (04) 387-397
15 Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G. et al. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012; 38 (01) 101-104
16 Aydın ZU, Keskin NB, Özyürek T, Geneci F, Ocak M, Çelik HH. Microcomputed assessment of transportation, centering ratio, canal area, and volume increase after single-file rotary and reciprocating glide path instrumentation in curved root canals: a laboratory study. J Endod 2019; 45 (06) 791-796
17 Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 1996; 22 (07) 369-375
18 Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32 (02) 271-275
19 van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, de Wet FA. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of two single rotary glide path systems. Int Endod J 2019; 52 (03) 352-358
20 van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, de Wet FA. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold instruments in maxillary first molars. J Endod 2019; 45 (01) 62-67
21 Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Düzgün S. Resistance to cyclic fatigue of PathFile, ScoutRaCe and ProGlider glide path files in an S-shaped canal. Int Endod J 2018; 51 (05) 509-514
22 Hashem AA, Ghoneim AG, Lutfy RA, Foda MY, Omar GA. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems. J Endod 2012; 38 (07) 996-1000
23 Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F. Influence of glide path preparation on the canal shaping times of WaveOne Gold in curved mandibular molar canals. J Endod 2018; 44 (05) 853-855
24 Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, Zgheib C, Arbab-Chirani R, Naaman A. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 2015; 48 (02) 162-170
25 Elashiry MM, Saber SE, Elashry SH. Comparison of shaping ability of different single-file systems using microcomputed tomography. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 70-76
26 Arruda EDS, Sponchiado-Júnior EC, Pandolfo MT, Fredson MAC, Roberi Garcia LDF, Marques AA. Apical transportation and centering ability after root canal filling removal using reciprocating and continuous rotary systems: a CBCT study. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (04) 613-618
27 Zheng L, Ji X, Li C, Zuo L, Wei X. Comparison of glide paths created with K-files, PathFiles, and the ProGlider file, and their effects on subsequent WaveOne preparation in curved canals. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18 (01) 152-157