Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(04): 589-597
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715893
Research Article

Considerations for Designing EHR-Embedded Clinical Decision Support Systems for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Pediatric Emergency Departments

Mustafa Ozkaynak
1   College of Nursing, University of Colorado-Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Noel Metcalf
1   College of Nursing, University of Colorado-Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Daniel M. Cohen
2   Division of Emergency Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Larissa S. May
3   Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Health, Davis, California, United States
,
Peter S. Dayan
4   Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
,
Rakesh D. Mistry
5   Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under award number R21AI139839 (principal investigator: R.D.M.).
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to explore the intersection between organizational environment, workflow, and technology in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) and how these factors impact antibiotic prescribing decisions.

Methods Semistructured interviews with 17 providers (1 fellow and 16 attending faculty), and observations of 21 providers (1 physician assistant, 5 residents, 3 fellows, and 12 attendings) were conducted at three EDs in the United States. We analyzed interview transcripts and observation notes using thematic analysis.

Results Seven themes relating to antibiotic prescribing decisions emerged as follows: (1) professional judgement, (2) cognition as a critical individual resource, (3) decision support as a critical organizational resource, (4) patient management with imperfect information, (5) information-seeking as a primary task, (6) time management, and (7) broad process boundaries of antibiotic prescribing.

Discussion The emerging interrelated themes identified in this study can be used as a blueprint to design, implement, and evaluate clinical decision support (CDS) systems that support antibiotic prescribing in EDs. The process boundaries of antibiotic prescribing are broader than the current boundaries covered by existing CDS systems. Incongruities between process boundaries and CDS can under-support clinicians and lead to suboptimal decisions. We identified two incongruities: (1) the lack of acknowledgment that the process boundaries go beyond the physical boundaries of the ED and (2) the lack of integration of information sources (e.g., accessibility to prior cultures on an individual patient outside of the organization).

Conclusion Significant opportunities exist to improve appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing by considering process boundaries in the design, implementation, and evaluation of CDS systems.

Keywords

clinical decision support - antimicrobial stewardship - process boundaries

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study protocol was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 24 March 2020

Accepted: 21 July 2020

Article published online:
09 September 2020

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Spellberg B, Blaser M, Guidos RJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). , et al; Combating antimicrobial resistance: policy recommendations to save lives. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52 (Suppl. 05) S397-S428
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 May L, Cosgrove S, L'Archeveque M. , et al. A call to action for antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department: approaches and strategies. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 62 (01) 69-77
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Shlaes DM, Gerding DN, John Jr. JF. , et al. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the prevention of antimicrobial resistance: guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25 (03) 584-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic/antimicrobial resistance (AR/AMR). . Accessed August 5, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/index.html
    PubMed
  • 5 Mistry RD, Dayan PS, Kuppermann N. The battle against antimicrobial resistance: time for the emergency department to join the fight. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (05) 421-422
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Donnelly JP, Baddley JW, Wang HE. Antibiotic utilization for acute respiratory tract infections in U.S. emergency departments. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58 (03) 1451-1457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kroening-Roche JC, Soroudi A, Castillo EM, Vilke GM. Antibiotic and bronchodilator prescribing for acute bronchitis in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2012; 43 (02) 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Paul IM, Maselli JH, Hersh AL, Boushey HA, Nielson DW, Cabana MD. Antibiotic prescribing during pediatric ambulatory care visits for asthma. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (06) 1014-1021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012; 33 (04) 322-327
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Avdic E, Cushinotto LA, Hughes AH. , et al. Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention on shortening the duration of therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54 (11) 1581-1587
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Fishman N. Antimicrobial stewardship. Am J Infect Control 2006; 34 (05) (Suppl. 01) S55-S63
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ohl CA, Luther VP. Antimicrobial stewardship for inpatient facilities. J Hosp Med 2011; 6 (Suppl. 01) S4-S15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Percival KM, Valenti KM, Schmittling SE, Strader BD, Lopez RR, Bergman SJ. Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention on urinary tract infection treatment in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33 (09) 1129-1133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ansari F, Gray K, Nathwani D. , et al. Outcomes of an intervention to improve hospital antibiotic prescribing: interrupted time series with segmented regression analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 52 (05) 842-848
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Croskerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9 (11) 1184-1204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Goldberg RM, Kuhn G, Andrew LB, Thomas Jr HA. Coping with medical mistakes and errors in judgment. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39 (03) 287-292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Grenier C, Pépin J, Nault V. , et al. Impact of guideline-consistent therapy on outcome of patients with healthcare-associated and community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 (07) 1617-1624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ozkaynak M, Wu DTY, Hannah K, Dayan PS, Mistry RD. Examining workflow in a pediatric emergency department to develop a clinical decision support for an antimicrobial stewardship program. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 248-260
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Shaw B, Cheater F, Baker R. , et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (03) CD005470
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Agwu AL, Lee CK, Jain SK. , et al. A world wide web-based antimicrobial stewardship program improves efficiency, communication, and user satisfaction and reduces cost in a tertiary care pediatric medical center. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47 (06) 747-753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Evans RS, Olson JA, Stenehjem E. , et al. Use of computer decision support in an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (01) 120-135
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Sick AC, Lehmann CU, Tamma PD, Lee CK, Agwu AL. Sustained savings from a longitudinal cost analysis of an internet-based preapproval antimicrobial stewardship program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34 (06) 573-580
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Venugopal V, Lehmann CU, Diener-West M, Agwu AL. Longitudinal evaluation of a World Wide Web-based antimicrobial stewardship program: assessing factors associated with approval patterns and trends over time. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42 (02) 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Webber EC, Warhurst HM, Smith SS, Cox EG, Crumby AS, Nichols KR. Conversion of a single-facility pediatric antimicrobial stewardship program to multi-facility application with computerized provider order entry and clinical decision support. Appl Clin Inform 2013; 4 (04) 556-568
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Mistry RD, Newland JG, Gerber JS. , et al. Current state of antimicrobial stewardship in children's hospital emergency departments. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38 (04) 469-475
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Simpao AF, Ahumada LM, Larru Martinez B. , et al. Design and implementation of a visual analytics electronic antibiogram within an electronic health record system at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (01) 37-45
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Sanchez GV, Fleming-Dutra KE, Roberts RM, Hicks LA. Core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016; 65 (06) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S. , et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (06) 523-530
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330 (7494): 765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Lobach DF, Jenders RA. Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress. Open Med Inform J 2010; 4: 235-244
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG. , et al. Durability of benefits of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention after discontinuation of audit and feedback. JAMA 2014; 312 (23) 2569-2570
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kullar R, Goff DA. Transformation of antimicrobial stewardship programs through technology and informatics. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2014; 28 (02) 291-300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kullar R, Goff DA, Schulz LT, Fox BC, Rose WE. The “epic” challenge of optimizing antimicrobial stewardship: the role of electronic medical records and technology. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57 (07) 1005-1013
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Liberati EG, Ruggiero F, Galuppo L. , et al. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation. Implement Sci 2017; 12 (01) 113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Rawson TM, Moore LSP, Hernandez B. , et al. A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately?. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23 (08) 524-532
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Wadhwa R, Fridsma DB, Saul MI. , et al. Analysis of a failed clinical decision support system for management of congestive heart failure. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008; 2008: 773-777
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Karsh BT, Alper SJ. Work system analysis: the key to understanding health care systems. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI. , eds. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publications; 2005: 337-348
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ozkaynak M, Ponnala S, Werner NE. Patient-oriented workflow approach. In: Zheng K, Westbrook J, Kannampallil TG, Patel VL. , eds. Cognitive Informatics: Reengineering Clinical Workflow for Safer and More Efficient Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019: 149-64
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Ozkaynak M, Valdez R, Holden RJ, Weiss J. Infinicare framework for integrated understanding of health-related activities in clinical and daily-living contexts. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2017; 7 (01) 66-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Walker JM, Carayon P. From tasks to processes: the case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28 (02) 467-477
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Creswell JW. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Robson C. Real World Research. 3rd ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2011
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Ozkaynak M, Reeder B, Drake C, Ferrarone P, Trautner B, Wald H. Characterizing Workflow to Inform Clinical Decision Support Systems in Nursing Homes. Gerontologist 2019; 59 (06) 1024-1033
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Lavrakas PJ. , ed. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Chung P, Scandlyn J, Dayan PS, Mistry RD. Working at the intersection of context, culture, and technology: provider perspectives on antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department using electronic health record clinical decision support. Am J Infect Control 2017; 45 (11) 1198-1202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Georgiou A, Prgomet M, Paoloni R. , et al. The effect of computerized provider order entry systems on clinical care and work processes in emergency departments: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 61 (06) 644-653.e16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 May L, Gudger G, Armstrong P. , et al. Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35 (09) 1114-1125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 McCaffery KJ, Smith SK, Wolf M. The challenge of shared decision making among patients with lower literacy: a framework for research and development. Med Decis Making 2010; 30 (01) 35-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Masterson Creber RM, Dayan PS, Kuppermann N. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) and the Clinical Research on Emergency Services and Treatments (CREST) Network. , et al; Applying the RE-AIM framework for the evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for pediatric head trauma: a mixed-methods study. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 693-703
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Harle CA, Apathy NC, Cook RL. Information Needs and Requirements for Decision Support in Primary Care: An Analysis of Chronic Pain Care. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings AMIA Symposium. 2018 ;2018: 527-34
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Pauwen NY, Louis E, Siegel C, Colombel J-F, Macq J. Integrated care for crohn's disease: a plea for the development of clinical decision support systems. J Crohn's Colitis 2018; 12 (12) 1499-1504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and management of penicillin allergy: a review. JAMA 2019; 321 (02) 188-199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Vyles D, Chiu A, Routes J. , et al. Antibiotic use after removal of penicillin allergy label. Pediatrics 2018; 141 (05) e20173466
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Chin-Yee B, Upshur R. Clinical judgement in the era of big data and predictive analytics. J Eval Clin Pract 2018; 24 (03) 638-645
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Fox J, Patkar V, Chronakis I, Begent R. From practice guidelines to clinical decision support: closing the loop. J R Soc Med 2009; 102 (11) 464-473
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Horsky J, Aarts J, Verheul L, Seger DL, van der Sijs H, Bates DW. Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. Int J Med Inform 2017; 97: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Marcial LH, Johnston DS, Shapiro MR, Jacobs SR, Blumenfeld B, Rojas Smith L. A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation. JAMIA Open 2019; 2 (01) 187-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Miller A, Koola JD, Matheny ME. , et al. Application of contextual design methods to inform targeted clinical decision support interventions in sub-specialty care environments. Int J Med Inform 2018; 117: 55-65
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE, Blumenfeld BH. Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the patient-centered CDS learning network. Learn Health Syst 2019; 4 (02) e10208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Altmann EM, Trafton J. , eds. Task Interruption: Resumption Lag and the Role of Cues. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; 2005: 43-48
    PubMed
  • 62 Gillie T, Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychol Res 1989; 50 (04) 243-250
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Relihan E, O'Brien V, O'Hara S, Silke B. The impact of a set of interventions to reduce interruptions and distractions to nurses during medication administration. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (05) e52
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh B-T. Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (04) 304-312
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar