PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(01): 077-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715915
Original Article

Pediatric Stainless-Steel Crown Cementation Finite Element Study

Ahmed S. Waly
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Heath, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University Assuit Branch, Egypt
2   Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges for Dentistry and Nursing, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
,
Yasser R. Souror 
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Heath, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University Assuit Branch, Egypt
3   Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College for Science and Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
,
Salah A. Yousief
2   Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges for Dentistry and Nursing, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4   Crown and Bridge Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al Azhar University Assiut Branch, Egypt
,
Waleed M.S. Alqahtani
5   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
,
Mohamed I. El-Anwar
6   Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Centre, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of using different cement types under pediatric stainless-steel crown (SSC) around mandibular second primary molar using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis.

Materials and Methods A 3D finite element model was built for pediatric mandibular molar by laser scanning of natural extracted tooth. Four types of cement (zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, and resin) of 200 μm layers thickness were tested under a stainless-steel crown of 130-μm thickness. Twelve case studies were reported within this research, as the applied load of 330 N was tested with three angulations: vertical, oblique at 45°, and laterally.

Results Linear static stress analysis was performed. The resultant stresses and deformations' distribution patterns did not change with cement type, while the values were altered. All deformations and stresses were found within the normal range.

Conclusions Analysis results indicated that using stiffer cement material increases tooth structure stresses and reduces crown body stresses and deformations, while bone was nearly insensitive to cement type.

Keywords

Hall technique - stainless steel crown - finite element - cement - zinc phosphate - glass ionomer


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Oktober 2020

© 2020. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24 (05) 501-505
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Papathanasiou AG, Curzon ME, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16 (04) 282-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zinelis S, Lambrinaki T, Kavvadia K, Papagiannoulis L. Morphological and compositional alterations of in vivo aged prefabricated pediatric metal crowns (PMCs). Dent Mater 2008; 24 (02) 216-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Innes N, Evans D, Stewart M, Keightley A. The Hall technique: a minimal intervention, child centred approach to managing the carious primary molar. University of Dundee. Available at: https://dentistry.dundee.ac.uk/files/3M_93C%20HallTechGuide2191110.pdf https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/HallTechGuide_V4.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2020
  • 5 Altoukhi DH, El-Housseiny AA. Hall technique for carious primary molars: a review of the literature. Dent J (Basel) 2020; 8 (01) 1-13
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Innes N, Stewart M, Souster G, Evans D. The Hall Technique; retrospective case-note follow-up of 5-year RCT. Br Dent J 2015; 219 (08) 395-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Page LA, Boyd DH, Davidson SE, McKay SK, Thomson WM, Innes NP. Acceptability of the Hall technique to parents and children. N Z Dent J 2014; 110 (01) 12-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Abu Serdaneh S, AlHalabi M, Kowash M. et al. Hall technique crowns and children’s masseter muscle activity: A surface electromyography pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2020; 30 (03) 303-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Singh DK, Jalaluddin M, Rajeev R. Trauma from occlusion: the overstrain of the supporting structures of the teeth. Indian J Dent Sci 2017; 9: 126-132
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Subramaniam P, Kondae S, Gupta KK. Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 34 (04) 309-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Geramy A, Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int 2003; 34 (07) 526-533
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lauritano F, Runci M, Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Bramanti E, Cicciù M. Three-dimensional evaluation of different prosthesis retention systems using finite element analysis and the Von Mises stress test. Minerva Stomatol 2016; 65 (06) 353-367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Arzukanyan AV, Spagnuolo G, Campagna P, Cicciù M. Application of bioengineering devices for stress evaluation in dentistry: the last 10 years FEM parametric analysis of outcomes and current trends. Minerva Stomatol 2020; 69 (01) 55-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cicciù M, Cervino G, Milone D, Risitano G. FEM Analysis of Dental Implant-Abutment Interface Overdenture Components and Parametric Evaluation of Equator®and Locator®Prosthodontics Attachments. Materials (Basel) 2019; 12 (04) 592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cicciù M, Cervino G, Milone D, Risitano G. FEM investigation of the stress distribution over mandibular bone due to screwed overdenture positioned on dental implants. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11 (09) 1512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Marlière DAA, Demètrio MS, Picinini LS, Oliveira RG, Netto HDMC. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A systematic review. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (01) 153-160
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hakim MAA, Khatab NMA, Mohamed KMG, Elheeny AA. A comparative three-dimensional finite element study of two space regainers in the mixed dentition stage. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 107-114
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Al Qahtani WMS, Yousief SA, El-Anwar MI. Recent advances in material and geometrical modelling in dental applications. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6 (06) 1138-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sabit AM, Mohsen CA, El-Anwar MI, Metawally MM. An in-vitro study of crowned endodontically treated immature permanent central incisor reinforced with different types of aesthetic posts using FEA. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2017; 16 (08) 82-87
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Fathy SM, El-Anwar MI, El-Fallal AA, El-Negoly SA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of lower molar tooth restored with fully milled and layered zirconia crowns. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 2014; 1 (04) 00022
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Romeed SA, Dunne SM. Stress analysis of different post-luting systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Aust Dent J 2013; 58 (01) 82-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ha S-R, Kim S-H, Han J-S. et al. The influence of various core designs on stress distribution in the veneered zirconia crown: a finite element analysis study. J Adv Prosthodont 2013; 5 (02) 187-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yilmaz Y, Kara NB, Yilmaz A, Sahin H. Wear and repair of stainless steel crowns. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011; 12 (01) 25-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Maruyama N, Mori D, Hiromoto S, Kanazawa K, Nakamura M. Fatigue strength of 316L-type stainless steel in simulated body fluids. Corros Sci 2011; 53 (06) 2222-2227
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sachdeva A, Punhani N, Bala M, Arora S, Gill GS, Dewan N. The prevalence and pattern of cavitated carious lesions in primary dentition among children under 5 years age in Sirsa, Haryana (India). J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015; 5 (06) 494-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bramanti E, Cervino G, Lauritano F. et al. FEM and von mises analysis on prosthetic crowns structural elements: Evaluation of different applied materials. Scientific World 2017; 2017: 1029574
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Cicciù M, Bramanti E, Cecchetti F, Scappaticci L, Guglielmino E, Risitano G. FEM and Von Mises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2014; 7 (01) 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cicciù M, Risitano G, Maiorana C, Franceschini G. Parametric analysis of the strength in the “Toronto” osseous-prosthesis system. Minerva Stomatol 2009; 58 (1-2) 9-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Al WMS Qahtani, El-Anwar MI. Advanced computational methods in Bio-Mechanics. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6 (04) 742-746
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dowling NE. Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Engineering Methods for Deformation, Fracture and Fatigue. 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 31 May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (08) e99-e109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Myers DR, Bell RA, Barenie JT. The effect of cement type and tooth preparation on the retention of stainless steel crowns. J Pedod 1981; 5 (04) 275-280
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Wilson AD. Zinc oxide dental cements in scientific aspects of dental materials. In: Von Fraunhofer JA. ed 1st ed London: Butterworth’s; 1975: 305
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Craig RG, Farah JW, Powers JM. Modulus of elasticity and strength properties of dental cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 92 (03) 588-591 DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1976.0571.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Campbell SD. A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all-ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62 (04) 476-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Panthri P, Srivastava N, Rana V. How efficacious are stainless steel crown luting cements: an ex vivo comparative study. EC Dental Science. 2018; 17 (11) 1887-1898
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Yilmaz Y, Simsek S, Dalmis A, Gurbuz T, Kocogullari ME. Evaluation of stainless steel crowns cemented with glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements. Am J Dent 2006; 19 (02) 106-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Li ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81 (05) 597-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 El-Anwar MI, Tamam RA, Fawzy UM, Yousief SA. The effect of luting cement type and thickness on stress distribution in upper premolar implant restored with metal ceramic crowns. Tanta Dent J 2015; 12 (01) 48-55
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar