Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(02): 161-166
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716322
Original Article

Breaking Down Silos: Collaboration in Head and Neck Reconstruction Research

Amanda K. Silva
1   Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
,
Eduardo D. Rodriguez
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
,
Adam S. Jacobson
3   Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
,
Jamie P. Levine
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Collaboration has been shown to be beneficial when we have complex problems and highly specialized groups, such as in head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and oral maxillofacial surgeons perform head and neck reconstruction research. While the specialties represent unique backgrounds, the degree of interdisciplinary collaboration and subtopic focus is unknown. We sought to describe the frequency of interinstitutional interdisciplinary collaboration and examine the association of specialty with research subtopics.

Methods Oral presentations from 2014 to 2018 focused on head and neck reconstruction or associated principles at the main reconstructive academic meetings in otolaryngology (American Head and Neck Society), plastic surgery (American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery), and oral maxillofacial surgery (American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons) were reviewed. Author specialty and institution data were recorded. All abstracts were assigned a research subtopic, chosen based on identified themes. Subtopic frequencies among the specialties were compared.

Results Thirteen of 88 (15%) US institutions participate in interdisciplinary collaboration in head and neck reconstruction research. Of the remaining institutions, 23 (31%) have researchers performing parallel work and not collaborating. Certain research subtopics were more often presented by each specialty, representing differing interests.

Conclusion Collaboration among head and neck reconstruction research at the US institutions is low compared with the potential. Specialties focus on different research subtopics, and therefore can benefit from working together.

Keywords

microsurgery - reconstruction - collaboration - research - interdisciplinary

Note

This work was presented as oral presentation at The American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 2019, in Palm Springs, CA.




Publication History

Received: 13 April 2020

Accepted: 15 July 2020

Article published online:
01 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Bradford CR. The care of the head and neck cancer patient is a team sport. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (04) 337-339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Nouraei SA, Middleton SE, Hudovsky A. et al. Role of reconstructive surgery in the management of head and neck cancer: a national outcomes analysis of 11,841 reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (04) 469-478
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Gardner HK. Smart Collaboration: How Professionals and Their Firms Succeed by Breaking Down Silos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2017
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 American Head and Neck Society, Previous meeting abstracts. . Accessed April 29, 2019 at: https://www.ahns.info/ahns-previous-meetings/
  • 5 American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Previous meeting abstracts. . Accessed April 29, 2019 at: https://www.microsurg.org/events/prior-year-annual-meeting-abstracts/
  • 6 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, Previous meeting abstracts. . Accessed April 29, 2019 at: https://www.aaoms.org/meetings-exhibitions/past-meetings
  • 7 Detsky AS, Gauthier SR, Fuchs VR. Specialization in medicine: how much is appropriate?. JAMA 2012; 307 (05) 463-464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ghazizadeh S, Kuan EC, Mallen-St Clair J. et al. It takes two: one resects, one reconstructs. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50 (04) 747-753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Jones NF, Johnson JT, Shestak KC, Myers EN, Swartz WM. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck: interdisciplinary collaboration between head and neck surgeons and plastic surgeons in 305 cases. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 36 (01) 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Offodile II AC, Aherrera AS, Wenger J, Tsai T, Orgill DP, Guo L. Impact of specialty training on the association between flap size and incidence of complications following microvascular head and neck reconstruction for cancer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (05) 348-354
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rendenbach C, Hölterhoff N, Hischke S. et al. Free flap surgery in Europe: an interdisciplinary survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47 (05) 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kutner JS, Westfall JM, Morrison EH, Beach MC, Jacobs EA, Rosenblatt RA. Facilitating collaboration among academic generalist disciplines: a call to action. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4 (02) 172-176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kulage KM, Larson EL, Begg MD. Sharing facilities and administrative cost recovery to facilitate interdisciplinary research. Acad Med 2011; 86 (03) 394-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Caruso HM, Rogers T, Bazerman MH. Boundaries need not be barriers: leading collaboration among groups in decentralized organizations. In: Pittinsky T. (ed). Crossing the divide: intergroup leadership in a world of difference. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kovatch KJ, Hanks JE, Stevens JR, Stucken CL. Current practices in microvascular reconstruction in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (01) 138-145
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar