PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(05): 521-528
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716360
Original Article

Predictors of PROMIS Physical Function at 2 Years following Knee Surgery

Darius Hunt
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Tina Zhang 
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Scott Koenig
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Ali Aneizi
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Gregory Perraut
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Keyan Shasti
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Alexander J. Wahl
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Sean J. Meredith
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
R. Frank Henn III
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Institutsangaben Funding This work was supported by a grant from The James Lawrence Kernan Hospital Endowment Fund, Incorporated.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) 2 years following knee surgery, and identify preoperative factors associated with postoperative PROMIS PF. Three hundred and sixty-five patients, age 17 years and older, undergoing knee surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed multiple questionnaires prior to surgery and again 2 years postoperatively including PROMIS PF, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), joint and body numeric pain scales (NPS), Tegner's activity scale (TAS), and Marx's activity rating scale (MARS). Mean PROMIS PF improved from 41.4 to 50.9 at 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with 2-year IKDC scores. Older age, female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, unemployment, lower income, government insurance, smoking, preoperative opioid use, having a legal claim, comorbidities, previous surgeries, higher body mass index (BMI), and knee arthroplasty were associated with worse 2-year PROMIS PF. Multivariable analysis confirmed that lower BMI, less NPS body pain, and higher MARS were independent predictors of greater 2-year PROMIS PF and better improvement in PROMIS PF. In this large, broad cohort of knee surgery patients, multiple preoperative factors were associated with PROMIS PF 2 years postoperatively. PROMIS PF scores improved significantly, but worse 2 year PROMIS PF scores and less improvement from baseline were independently predicted by higher BMI, greater NPS body pain, and lower MARS activity level. PROMIS PF can be implemented as an efficient means to assess outcomes after knee surgery.

Keywords

PROMIS - physical function - knee - patient-reported outcomes


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 08. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 21. Juli 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (03) 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kim S, Bosque J, Meehan JP, Jamali A, Marder R. Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (11) 994-1000
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Rose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Bruce B, Fries JF, Ware Jr JE. The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67 (05) 516-526
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Beckmann JT, Hung M, Bounsanga J, Wylie JD, Granger EK, Tashjian RZ. Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computerized adaptive test in comparison to the American shoulder and elbow surgeons score and simple shoulder test in patients with rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24 (12) 1961-1967
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cella D, Riley W, Stone A. et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group.. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63 (11) 1179-1194
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hung M, Clegg DO, Greene T, Saltzman CL. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res 2011; 29 (06) 947-953
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hung M, Stuart AR, Higgins TF, Saltzman CL, Kubiak EN. Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (08) 439-443
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Morgan JH, Kallen MA, Okike K, Lee OC, Vrahas MS. PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test compared with other upper extremity outcome measures in the evaluation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (06) 257-263
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Papuga MO, Beck CA, Kates SL, Schwarz EM, Maloney MD. Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (06) 793-801
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bass M, Morris S, Neapolitan R. Utilizing multidimensional computer adaptive testing to mitigate burden with patient reported outcomes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc AMIA Symp 2015; 2015: 320-328
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Flens G, Smits N, Terwee CB, Dekker J, Huijbrechts I, de Beurs E. Development of a computer adaptive test for depression based on the Dutch-flemish version of the PROMIS item bank. Eval Health Prof 2017; 40 (01) 79-105
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Fries JF, Witter J, Rose M, Cella D, Khanna D, Morgan-DeWitt E. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function. J Rheumatol 2014; 41 (01) 153-158
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lee D, Armaghani S, Archer KR. et al. Preoperative opioid use as a predictor of adverse postoperative self-reported outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (11) e89
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Harris AB, Marrache M, Puvanesarajah V. et al. Are preoperative depression and anxiety associated with patient-reported outcomes, health care payments, and opioid use after anterior discectomy and fusion?. Spine J 2020; 20 (08) 1167-1175
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fidai MS, Tramer JS, Meldau J. et al. Mental health and tobacco use are correlated with physical function outcomes in patients with knee pain and injury. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (12) 3295-3301
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Christensen J, Peters C, Gililland J, Stoddard G, Pelt C. Physical activity, pain interference and comorbidities relate to PROMIS physical function in younger adults following total knee arthroplasty. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 1-7
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ho B, Houck JR, Flemister AS. et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37 (09) 911-918
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gagnier JJ. Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Orthop Res 2017; 35 (10) 2098-2108
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 MOTION Group. Patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (05) 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11) S208-S228
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D. et al; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form. Joint Bone Spine 2007; 74 (06) 594-599
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Miles M, Nadarajah V, Jauregui JJ. et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in patients undergoing knee surgery. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (08) 810-817
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Robins RJ, Anderson MB, Zhang Y, Presson AP, Burks RT, Greis PE. Convergent validity of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system's physical function computerized adaptive test for the knee and shoulder injury sports medicine patient population. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (03) 608-616
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA. et al. Performance of PROMIS for healthy patients undergoing meniscal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (11) 954-958
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Scott EJ, Westermann R, Glass NA, Hettrich C, Wolf BR, Bollier MJ. Performance of the PROMIS in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (05) 2325967118774509
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Henn III RF, Dubina AG, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Tracy JK. The Maryland Orthopaedic Registry (MOR): design and baseline characteristics of a prospective registry. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (04) 301-307
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Saleh KJ, Bershadsky B, Cheng E, Kane R. Lessons learned from the hip and knee musculoskeletal outcomes data evaluation and management system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429) 272-278
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Rossi MJ, Lubowitz JH, Guttmann D. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (01) 152
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 43-49
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Booth M. Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71 (Suppl. 02) 114-120
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (02) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Blanchett JW, Kuhlmann NA, Fidai MS, Borowsky PA, Muh SJ, Makhni EC. Using patient-reported outcome measurement information system computer adaptive testing domains to investigate the impact of obesity on physical function, pain interference, and mental health in sports medicine patients. J Obes Metab Syndr 2019; 28 (04) 246-253
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Wright MA, Adelani M, Dy C, OʼKeefe R, Calfee RP. What is the impact of social deprivation on physical and mental health in orthopaedic patients?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477 (08) 1825-1835
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Chen RE, Papuga MO, Voloshin I. et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative outcomes after primary acl reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (05) 2325967118771286
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Okoroha KR, Lu Y, Nwachukwu BU. et al. How should we define clinically significant improvement on patient-reported outcomes measurement information system test for patients undergoing knee meniscal surgery?. Arthroscopy 2020; 36 (01) 241-250
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Hung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL. Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World J Orthop 2018; 9 (03) 41-49
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Slover JD, Walsh MG, Zuckerman JD. Sex and race characteristics in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty in an urban setting. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (04) 576-580
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Chen J. et al. Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 86-97
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Goodman SM, Mandl LA, Mehta B. et al. Does education level mitigate the effect of poverty on total knee arthroplasty outcomes?. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70 (06) 884-891
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Tischler EH, Matsen Ko L, Chen AF, Maltenfort MG, Schroeder J, Austin MS. Smoking increases the rate of reoperation for infection within 90 days after primary total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (04) 295-304
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Rajamäki TJ, Jämsen E, Puolakka PA, Nevalainen PI, Moilanen T. Diabetes is associated with persistent pain after hip and knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (05) 586-593
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kim SC, Jin Y, Lee YC. et al. Association of preoperative opioid use with mortality and short-term safety outcomes after total knee replacement. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (07) e198061
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Meredith SJ, Nadarajah V, Jauregui JJ. et al. Preoperative opioid use in knee surgery patients. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (07) 630-636
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Kha ST, Scheman J, Davin S, Benzel EC. The impact of preoperative chronic opioid therapy in patients undergoing decompression laminectomy of the lumbar spine. Spine 2020; 45 (07) 438-443
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Pivec R, Issa K, Naziri Q, Kapadia BH, Bonutti PM, Mont MA. Opioid use prior to total hip arthroplasty leads to worse clinical outcomes. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (06) 1159-1165
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Lavernia CJ, Villa JM, Contreras JS. Arthroplasty knee surgery and alcohol use: risk factor or benefit?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 189-194
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Medina SH, Nadarajah V, Jauregui JJ. et al. Orthopaedic surgery patients who use recreational marijuana have less pre-operative pain. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (02) 283-292
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Sugai K, Takeda-Imai F, Michikawa T, Nakamura T, Takebayashi T, Nishiwaki Y. Association between knee pain, impaired function, and development of depressive symptoms. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66 (03) 570-576
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ring DC. The role of emotional health in functional outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: extending the biopsychosocial model to orthopaedics: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (21) e165
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Stiegel KR, Lash JG, Peace AJ, Coleman MM, Harrington MA, Cahill CW. Early experience and results using patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scores in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (10) 2313-2318
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Hafkamp FJ, de Vries J, Gosens T, den Oudsten BL. High pre-operative expectations precede both unfulfilled expectations and clinical improvement after total hip and total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (07) 1806-1812
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Tilbury C, Haanstra TM, Verdegaal SHM. et al. Patients' pre-operative general and specific outcome expectations predict postoperative pain and function after total knee and total hip arthroplasties. Scand J Pain 2018; 18 (03) 457-466
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Henn III RF, Kang L, Tashjian RZ, Green A. Patients' preoperative expectations predict the outcome of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (09) 1913-1919
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar