Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716518
Ophthalmology Practice during Peak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Global Community Perspective
Funding None.Abstract
Objective The rise of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from Wuhan, China, in December 2019 has spread to more than 188 countries and has affected more than 13 million people. In response to this crisis, recommendations by the World Health Organization have changed the practice of current medicine, but there is little research as to how high-volume ambulatory specialties such as ophthalmology are adapting. The purpose of this study is to determine how ophthalmology practices are reacting and changing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods Approval was obtained from Saint Louis University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. An anonymous survey was made on Google Forms and distributed to ophthalmologists throughout the world. Questions were divided into five sections: demographics, general questions, inpatient care/consults, practice management, and personal impact. The survey was opened on March 31, 2020, and closed on April 12, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.
Results A total of 494 responders from 42 countries completed the survey. Respondents were predominantly practicing ophthalmologists (85%), with the next highest demographic being ophthalmology trainees (8%). Fear of spreading COVID-19 to patients or loved ones was the highest source of anxiety among practitioners across all practice settings and continental location (p = 0.003). The second source of anxiety varied, with private practitioners identifying financial difficulty compared with employed clinicians listing self-contamination. Anxiety levels were the same throughout all practice settings, ages, and subspecialties (p = 0.2527). Ophthalmologists listed ophthalmological Web sites/societies, discussion with colleagues, and social media as primary sources of guidance with no difference based on practice setting (p = 0.143). Finally, all continents increased their application of telemedicine as a patient care modality, with North America expanding significantly more than other continents.
Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed ophthalmology practice and has added a high level of stress to ophthalmologists globally. These results demonstrate that clinicians are largely alike across age group, country, and specialty, but key differences in source of anxiety and in application of telemedicine highlight diversity in culture and reaction to the pandemic.
Note
For the availability of data and material, please contact the corresponding author. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the survey.
Ethical Approval
IRB approved by Saint Louis University IRB on March 31, 2020 (Protocol #31142).
Publication History
Received: 06 May 2020
Accepted: 30 July 2020
Article published online:
10 October 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
-
References
- 1 Dong E. et al. Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at John Hopkins University. ArcGIS Dashboards 2020. Available at: aregis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b448e9ecf6
- 2 She J, Jiang J, Ye L, Hu L, Bai C, Song Y. 2019 novel coronavirus of pneumonia in Wuhan, China: emerging attack and management strategies. Clin Translational Med 2020; 9 (01) 19
- 3 Olivia Li JP, Shantha J, Wong TY. et al. Preparedness among Ophthalmologists: During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ophthalmology 2020; 127 (05) 569-572
- 4 Adalja AA, Toner E, Inglesby TV. Priorities for the US Health Community Responding to COVID-19. JAMA 2020; 323 (14) 1343-1344
- 5 Ferguson NM, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G. et al. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Available at: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
- 6 American College of Surgeons. COVID-19: Guidance for Triage of Non-Emergent Surgical Procedures. Accessed March 17, 2020 at: https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/triage
- 7 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Important Coronavirus Updates for Clinicians. Accessed April 15, 2020 at: https://www.aao.org/headline/alert-important-coronavirus-context
- 8 American Society of Retina Specialists. COVID-19 Survey March 24, 2020. Accessed July 10, 2020 at: https://files.constantcontact.com/98b7aceb001/ef43bfba-942b-4e1c-b810-35502bbacb07.pdf
- 9 American Dental Association. COVID-19: Economic Impact on Dental Practices (Summary Results). March 2020. Accessed July 10, 2020 at: https://www.ada.org/en/science-research/health-policy-institute/covid-19-dentists-economic-impact
- 10 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Coronavirus Kills Chinese Whistleblower Ophthalmologist. Accessed February 11, 2020 at: www.aao.org/headline/coronavirus-kills-chinese-whistleblower-ophthalmol
- 11 Salzman IJ. Thoughts from Your Colleagues. EyeNet Magazine. Available at: https://www.aao.org/eyenet/article/thoughts-from-your-colleagues-56?august-2020