Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2021; 10(03): 244-252
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716934
Techniques in Neurosurgery

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain: A Technical Note Initial Experience of Two cases

Sanjeev Srivastava 
1   Artemis Agrim Institute of Neurosciences, Artemis Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Pawan Goyal
1   Artemis Agrim Institute of Neurosciences, Artemis Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Anurag Sharma 
1   Artemis Agrim Institute of Neurosciences, Artemis Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Sanjay K. Rajan
1   Artemis Agrim Institute of Neurosciences, Artemis Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Aditya Gupta
1   Artemis Agrim Institute of Neurosciences, Artemis Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation is an established procedure for relieving chronic neuropathic pain conditions. Although it has been over five decades since the first spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was developed, it has only been used in a few cases in India. It is primarily based on the “Gate Theory” of pain. The mechanism of its action is not exactly clear, but reports have suggested that it plays the main role in selectively stimulating the large diameter pain fibers in the dorsal aspect of spinal cord. SCS procedure involves a very careful case selection, and current evidence suggests that only a few conditions of chronic refractory neuropathic pain are its established indications. In these patients too, the efficacy rate remains around 50 to 75%. The overall pain relief observed is around 50% decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores. It is a technically simple procedure involving placement of electrodes over the dorsal aspect of spinal cord in the epidural space. The procedure is a staged one in which trial lead electrodes are first implanted and stimulated with an external pulse generator (EPG). If the trial is successful and patient has acceptable pain relief over 1 week of stimulation at various settings, the patient undergoes the permanent implantation of electrodes at the same position. The permanent electrodes are then stimulated by an implantable pulse generator (IPG) in the subcutaneous pocket (abdominal or gluteal). Complications are rare and are more related to hardware like lead migration and breakage. Since it is does not damage the cord per se, its acceptance as a procedure for pain is known quite well in the Western world. Its availability and cost of implants is the major hurdle in its use in a developing nation like India. Here, we present a technical note and our experience of two cases of thoracic spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain at our institution.

Keywords

spinal cord stimulator - lead electrodes - paddle electrodes - implantable pulse generator - trial stimulation - permanent stimulation


Publication History

Article published online:
12 January 2021

© 2021. Neurological Surgeons’ Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 1967; 46 (04) 489-491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Shealy CN, Taslitz N, Mortimer JT, Becker DP. Electrical inhibition of pain: experimental evaluation. Anesth Analg 1967; 46 (03) 299-305
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150 (3699) 971-979
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Schechtmann G, Song Z, Ultenius C, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. Cholinergic mechanisms involved in the pain relieving effect of spinal cord stimulation in a model of neuropathy. Pain 2008; 139 (01) 136-145
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kavar B, Rosenfeld JV, Hutchinson A. The efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. J Clin Neurosci 2000; 7 (05) 409-413
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cui JG, O’Connor WT, Ungerstedt U, Linderoth B, Meyerson BA. Spinal cord stimulation attenuates augmented dorsal horn release of excitatory amino acids in mononeuropathy via a GABAergic mechanism. Pain 1997; 73 (01) 87-95
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nagel SJ, Lempka SF, Machado AG. Percutaneous spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: indications and patient selection. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2014; 25 (04) 723-733
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L. et al Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 2007; 132 (1-2) 179-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kemler MA, de Vet HC, Barendse GA, van den Wildenberg FA, van Kleef M. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome Type I: five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (02) 292-298
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Doleys DM. Psychological factors in spinal cord stimulation therapy: brief review and discussion. Neurosurg Focus 2006; 21 (06) E1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kumar K, Hunter G, Demeria D. Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (03) 481-496 discussion 481–496
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 North RB, Kidd DH, Wimberly RL, Edwin D. Prognostic value of psychological testing in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 1996; 39 (02) 301-310 discussion 310–311
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Holsheimer J. Computer modelling of spinal cord stimulation and its contribution to therapeutic efficacy. Spinal Cord 1998; 36 (08) 531-540
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (02) 381-389 discussion 389–390
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Dones I, Levi V. Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current trends and future applications. Brain Sci 2018; 8 (08) 138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Taylor RS, Desai MJ, Rigoard P, Taylor RJ. Predictors of pain relief following spinal cord stimulation in chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Pain Pract 2014; 14 (06) 489-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Grider JS, Manchikanti L, Carayannopoulos A. et al Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician 2016; 19 (01) E33-E54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (03) Suppl Spine) 254-267
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kemler MA, Barendse GA, van Kleef M. et al Spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. N Engl J Med 2000; 343 (09) 618-624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 May MS, Banks C, Thomson SJ. A retrospective, long-term, third-party follow-up of patients considered for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 2002; 5 (03) 137-144
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hoelzer BC, Bendel MA, Deer TR. et al Spinal cord stimulator implant infection rates and risk factors: a multicenter retrospective study. Neuromodulation 2017; 20 (06) 558-562
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Levy RM. Device complication and failure management in neuromodulation. Neuromodulation 2013; 16 (06) 495-502
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Eldabe S, Buchser E, Duarte RV. Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: a review of the literature. Pain Med 2016; 17 (02) 325-336
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Shamji MF, Westwick HJ, Heary RF. Complications related to the use of spinal cord stimulation for managing persistent postoperative neuropathic pain after lumbar spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2015; 39 (04) E15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Shechter R, Yang F, Xu Q. et al Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Anesthesiology 2013; 119 (02) 422-432
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Yearwood TL, Hershey B, Bradley K, Lee D. Pulse width programming in spinal cord stimulation: a clinical study. Pain Physician 2010; 13 (04) 321-335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, van der Loo E, Menovsky T. Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (05) 986-990
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 De Ridder D, Perera S, Vanneste S. Are 10 kHz stimulation and burst stimulation fundamentally the same?. Neuromodulation 2017; 20 (07) 650-653
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Arle JE, Mei L, Carlson KW, Shils JL. High-frequency stimulation of dorsal column axons: potential underlying mechanism of paresthesia-free neuropathic pain relief. Neuromodulation 2016; 19 (04) 385-397
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Deer TR, Levy RM, Kramer J. et al Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial. Pain 2017; 158 (04) 669-681
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Harrison C, Epton S, Bojanic S, Green AL, FitzGerald JJ. The efficacy and safety of dorsal root ganglion stimulation as a treatment for neuropathic pain: a literature review. Neuromodulation 2018; 21 (03) 225-233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar