Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717062
Responding to Patient-Initiated Verbal Sexual Harassment: Outcomes of a Pilot Training for Ophthalmologists
Funding The authors acknowledge the support of an unrestricted grant to the University of Iowa, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NY. Dr. Abramoff received support from the National Institutes of Health Center Core (grant number: P30EY025580). There are no relevant financial disclosures for any author.Abstract
Background Sexual harassment of physicians by patients is highly prevalent and rarely reported. Little is known on how to prepare physicians to handle verbal sexual harassment that detracts from their ability to provide care but does not meet the threshold for reporting.
Purpose To assess the impact of a sexual harassment workshop and toolkit for ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees on responding to patient-initiated verbal sexual harassment.
Methods A survey study of ophthalmology faculty, fellows, and residents who participated in workshops on responding to patient-initiated verbal sexual harassment was performed at an academic center. A toolkit of strategies for response was distributed. Volunteer participants completed a retrospective pretest–posttest evaluation at the conclusion of the workshop and follow-up survey 3 weeks after the workshops on whether they experienced harassment and intervened. The pretest–posttest surveys assessed the workshop's effect on ophthalmologists' perceptions of and preparedness to respond to sexual harassment in the moment using a 5-point Likert scale, including bystander intervention. Participants described their responses observing and/or experiencing patient-initiated sexual harassment in the 3 weeks following the workshop and whether they had intervened toward the harassment.
Results Ophthalmologists (n = 31) felt significantly more prepared to respond to patient-initiated sexual harassment directed toward themselves or a trainee in the moment after participating in the workshop (4.5 ± 1.63) than before (3.0 ± 1.3) with a mean change of 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 0.98–2.2, p < 0.001). After the workshop, 86.3% of participants felt mostly or completely prepared to respond to comments about their age, gender, marital status, appearance, attractiveness, a specific body part, and sexual or inappropriate jokes. Most participants (83.9%) said that they had not previously received training on techniques for responding to patient-initiated sexual harassment. Two-thirds (66.7%) of participants who experienced (n = 8) or observed (n = 13) harassment (n = 15) following the workshop intervened. All participants who intervened toward patient-initiated harassment behavior after the workshop (n = 10) found the Sexual Harassment Toolkit helpful in addressing harassment in the moment.
Conclusion Participation in a brief skills-based workshop significantly improved ophthalmologists' preparedness to respond to verbal sexual harassment by patients.
Keywords
ophthalmology - resident - sexual harassment - toolkit - workshop - patient - training - genderPublication History
Received: 03 March 2020
Accepted: 11 August 2020
Article published online:
10 October 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
-
References
- 1 Jenner S, Djermester P, Prügl J, Kurmeyer C, Oertelt-Prigione S. Prevalence of sexual harassment in academic medicine. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (01) 108-111
- 2 Fnais N, Soobiah C, Chen MH. et al. Harassment and discrimination in medical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2014; 89 (05) 817-827
- 3 Cabrera MT, Enyedi LB, Ding L, MacDonald SM. Sexual harassment in ophthalmology: a survey study. Ophthalmology 2019; 126 (01) 172-174
- 4 Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB. et al. Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. N Engl J Med 2019; 381 (18) 1741-1752
- 5 Espinoza M, Hsiehchen D. Characteristics of faculty accused of academic sexual misconduct in the biomedical and health sciences. JAMA 2020; 323 (15) 1503-1505
- 6 McKinley SK, Wang LJ, Gartland RM. et al. Massachusetts General Hospital Gender Equity Task Force. “Yes, I'm the doctor”: One department's approach to assessing and addressing gender-based discrimination in the modern medical training era. Acad Med 2019; 94 (11) 1691-1698
- 7 Scruggs BA, Hock LE, Cabrera MT, Wang K, Oetting TA, Abràmoff MD, Shriver EM. A U.S. Survey of Sexual Harassment in Ophthalmology Training Using a Novel Standardized Scale. Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2020; 12 (01) e27-e35
- 8 O'Reilly KB. AMA principles will further gender equity among physicians. American Medical Association. Physician Diversity Web site. . Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/physician-diversity/ama-principles-will-further-gender-equity-among-physicians . Published 2019. Accessed July 18, 2019
- 9 National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine. Together We Can Do Better: A Gathering of Leaders in Academia to Prevent Sexual Harassment: Proceedings of a Workshop–in Brief. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2019
- 10 Viglianti EM, Oliverio AL, Meeks LM. Sexual harassment and abuse: when the patient is the perpetrator. Lancet 2018; 392 (10145): 368-370
- 11 ACGME. Non-Discrimination Policy. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Legal/Non-Discrimination-Policy . Published 2020. Accessed June 23, 2020
- 12 Alfandre D, Geppert C. Discriminatory and sexually inappropriate remarks from patients and their challenge to professionalism. Am J Med 2019; 132 (11) 1251-1253
- 13 Warsame RM, Hayes SN. Mayo Clinic's 5-step policy for responding to bias incidents. AMA J Ethics 2019; 21 (06) E521-E529
- 14 Shrier DK, Zucker AN, Mercurio AE, Landry LJ, Rich M, Shrier LA. Generation to generation: discrimination and harassment experiences of physician mothers and their physician daughters. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2007; 16 (06) 883-894
- 15 Periyakoil VS, Chaudron L, Hill EV, Pellegrini V, Neri E, Kraemer HC. Common types of gender-based microaggressions in medicine. Acad Med 2020; 95 (03) 450-457
- 16 Katz J. Bystander training as leadership training: notes on the origins, philosophy, and pedagogy of the Mentors in Violence Prevention model. Violence Against Women 2018; 24 (15) 1755-1776
- 17 Aggarwal R, Brenner AM. #MeToo: the role and power of bystanders (aka us). Acad Psychiatry 2020; 44 (01) 5-10
- 18 Goldenberg MN, Cyrus KD, Wilkins KM. ERASE: a new framework for faculty to manage patient mistreatment of trainees. Acad Psychiatry 2019; 43 (04) 396-399
- 19 Hock LE, Scruggs BA, Oetting TA, Abramoff MD, Shriver EM. Tools for responding to patient-initiated verbal sexual harassment. Available at: https://EyeRounds.org/tutorials/sexual-harassment-toolkit/index.htm . Updated August 20, 2019. Accessed August 2, 2020
- 20 Pratt CC, McGuigan WM, Katzev AR. Measuring program outcomes: using retrospective pretest methodology. Am J Eval 2000; 21 (03) 341-349
- 21 Goodman DJ. Responding to biased or offensive comments. Adapted from Promoting Diversity and Social Justice: Educating People from Privileged Groups. New York: Routledge; 2011. . Available at: https://dianegoodman.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/RespondingToBiasedOrOffensiveCommentsexcerptarticle.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2020
- 22 Wheeler DJ, Zapata J, Davis D, Chou C. Twelve tips for responding to microaggressions and overt discrimination: when the patient offends the learner. Med Teach 2018; 1-6