Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718570
Predictors of Manual Dexterity in Simulation-Based Cataract Surgery
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study is to determine if prior experience with fine motor hobbies influences a surgeon-in-training's performance on a cataract surgical simulator.
Materials and Methods Medical students (n = 70) performed navigation, forceps, and capsulorhexis simulations using the Eyesi Ophthalmosurgical Simulator. Participants were surveyed regarding fine motor hobby experiences, including musical instruments, video games, sewing, knitting, origami, painting, crafting, jewelry making, drawing, and extracurricular dissection.
Results Medical students with extracurricular dissection experience, including work in research laboratories involving microscopic animal dissection, did significantly better on the forceps simulator task (p = 0.009). Medical students with drawing experience performed better on capsulorhexis (p = 0.031). No other fine motor hobbies were significant for improving simulator scores.
Conclusion Drawing and extracurricular dissection lend to improved technical ability on the cataract surgical simulator. This research continues the conversation regarding fine motor hobbies that correlate with microsurgical ability and adds to the growing area of research regarding the selection and training of ophthalmology residents.
Note
This study was previously presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Poster Presentation; 2019 April 28; Vancouver, BC. All authors fulfill the criteria for authorship and take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole.
Publication History
Received: 14 July 2020
Accepted: 07 September 2020
Article published online:
09 November 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
-
References
- 1 Binenbaum G, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident surgical competency: a national survey. Ophthalmology 2006; 113 (07) 1237-1244
- 2 Chung AT, Lenci LT, Wang K. et al. Effect of fine-motor-skill activities on surgical simulator performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43 (07) 915-922
- 3 Osborn HA, Kuthubutheen J, Yao C, Chen JM, Lin VY. Predicting microsurgical aptitude. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (07) 1203-1208
- 4 Khalifa YM, Bogorad D, Gibson V, Peifer J, Nussbaum J. Virtual reality in ophthalmology training. Surv Ophthalmol 2006; 51 (03) 259-273
- 5 Daly MK, Gonzalez E, Siracuse-Lee D, Legutko PA. Efficacy of surgical simulator training versus traditional wet-lab training on operating room performance of ophthalmology residents during the capsulorhexis in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39 (11) 1734-1741
- 6 Staropoli PC, Gregori NZ, Junk AK. et al. Surgical simulation training reduces intraoperative cataract surgery complications among residents. Simul Healthc 2018; 13 (01) 11-15
- 7 Tran EM, Scott IU, Clark MA, Greenberg PB. Resident wellness in US ophthalmic graduate medical education: the resident perspective. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018; 136 (06) 695-701
- 8 Lu A, Beckstead S, Wilkinson M. et al. Surgical aptitude testing among ophthalmology residency applicants: current utilization and residency program directors' perspectives. J Acad Ophthalmol. 2019; 11: e10-e17
- 9 Kirby TJ. Dexterity testing and residents' surgical performance. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1979; 77: 294-307
- 10 Jardine D, Hoagland B, Perez A, Gessler E. Evaluation of surgical dexterity during the interview day: another factor for consideration. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (02) 234-237
- 11 Tang CG, Hilsinger Jr RL, Cruz RM, Schloegel LJ, Byl Jr FM, Rasgon BM. Manual dexterity aptitude testing: a soap carving study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (03) 243-249
- 12 Sammut M, Sammut M, Andrejevic P. The benefits of being a video gamer in laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 2017; 45: 42-46
- 13 Moglia A, Perrone V, Ferrari V. et al. Influence of videogames and musical instruments on performances at a simulator for robotic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2017; 26 (03) 129-134
- 14 Bergqvist J, Person A, Vestergaard A, Grauslund J. Establishment of a validated training programme on the Eyesi cataract simulator. A prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92 (07) 629-634
- 15 Thomsen AS, Smith P, Subhi Y. et al. High correlation between performance on a virtual-reality simulator and real-life cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95 (03) 307-311
- 16 Jacobsen MF, Konge L, Bach-Holm D. et al. Correlation of virtual reality performance with real-life cataract surgery performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45 (09) 1246-1251
- 17 Selvander M, Asman P. Cataract surgeons outperform medical students in Eyesi virtual reality cataract surgery: evidence for construct validity. Acta Ophthalmol 2013; 91 (05) 469-474