Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(06): 544-552
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718580
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Improving Utilization of Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia in a High-Risk Urban Cohort: A Prospective Cohort Study

Autoren

  • Rupsa C. Boelig

    1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mariam Wanees

    1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Tingting Zhan

    2   Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Vincenzo Berghella

    1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Amanda Roman

    1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Funding This study was funded by March of Dimes Foundation, Community Grant 2018 (PI: R.C.B.), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, grant no.: T32GM008562; and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation, Faculty Development Award.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the utilization of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention before and after implementation of a screening tool during nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound.

Study Design One-year prospective cohort study of patients at high risk for preeclampsia after the implementation of a screening tool (postscreen) administered to all patients at check in for NT (11–13 weeks) ultrasound. Prospective cohort was compared with one-year retrospective cohort (prescreen) the year prior (2017). All patients who presented for NT ultrasound in both cohorts were evaluated for the presence of one or more risk factor for preeclampsia with screening tool collected prospectively and chart review retrospectively. Provider recommendation for aspirin determined by documentation in prenatal record. Primary outcome was rate of provider recommendation for aspirin pre versus post screening tool, compared by Chi-square test and adjusted for potential confounders with multiple regression analysis.

Results Pre- (n = 156) and postscreen (n = 136) cohorts were similar except for race and multifetal gestation. Prescreen, rate of provider recommendation for aspirin was 74%. Of those with prior preeclampsia, 96% were recommended aspirin, compared with 64% of patients with other risk factors (p < 0.001). Postscreen, provider recommendation of aspirin improved to 95% (p < 0.001). Rate of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension were similar between cohorts; however, there was a reduced adjusted risk in overall preterm birth <37 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.50 [0.25–0.99]) and preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR = 0.33 [0.13–0.88]) postscreening tool implementation.

Conclusion Prior to implementation of a simple screening questionnaire, approximately 25% of high risk patients did not receive the recommendation of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention. High-risk patients who lack a history of preeclampsia were less likely to be advised of aspirin prophylaxis. Use of a simple universal screening tool at time of NT ultrasound significantly improved utilization of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention and may improve patient outcomes.

Key Points

  • Despite recommendations, aspirin use for preeclampsia prevention is suboptimal.

  • High-risk patients who lack a history preeclampsia were less likely to be advised of aspirin use.

  • A simple universal screening tool can significantly improve aspirin utilization.

Note

The study was presented at Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine Annual Pregnancy Meeting February 2020, Dallas, TX.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 11. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 07. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Oktober 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA