Ethical Considerations on Pediatric Genetic Testing Results in Electronic Health Records

Abstract

Background Advances in technology and access to expanded genetic testing have resulted in more children and adolescents receiving genetic testing for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. With increased adoption of the electronic health record (EHR), genetic testing is increasingly resulted in the EHR. However, this leads to challenges in both storage and disclosure of genetic results, particularly when parental results are combined with child genetic results.

Privacy and Ethical Considerations Accidental disclosure and erroneous documentation of genetic results can occur due to the nature of their presentation in the EHR and documentation processes by clinicians. Genetic information is both sensitive and identifying, and requires a considered approach to both timing and extent of disclosure to families and access to clinicians.

Methods This article uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore ethical issues surrounding privacy, confidentiality of genetic data, and access to genetic results by health care providers and family members, and provides suggestions in a stakeholder format for best practices on this topic for clinicians and informaticians. Suggestions are made for clinicians on documenting and accessing genetic information in the EHR, and on collaborating with genetics specialists and disclosure of genetic results to families. Additional considerations for families including ethics around results of adolescents and special scenarios for blended families and foster minors are also provided. Finally, administrators and informaticians are provided best practices on both institutional processes and EHR architecture, including security and access control, with emphasis on the minimum necessary paradigm and parent/patient engagement and control of the use and disclosure of data.

Conclusion The authors hope that these best practices energize specialty societies to craft practice guidelines on genetic information management in the EHR with interdisciplinary input that addresses all stakeholder needs.

Keywords

ethics - privacy - confidentiality - children - genetic testing - electronic health record

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human subjects were involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 08. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. November 2020

• References

• 1 Cohen E, Kuo DZ, Agrawal R. et al. Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (03) 529-538
• 2 Oei K, Hayeems RZ, Ungar WJ, Cohn RD, Cohen E. Genetic Testing among Children in a Complex Care Program. Children (Basel) 2017; 4 (05) 42
• 3 Manolio TA, Abramowicz M, Al-Mulla F. et al. Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7 (290) 290ps13
• 4 Wetterstrand KA. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP). Available at: www.genome.gov/sequencingcostsdata. Accessed April 14, 2020
• 5 Manning M, Hudgins L. Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med 2010; 12 (11) 742-745
• 6 Behjati S, Tarpey PS. What is next generation sequencing?. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2013; 98 (06) 236-238
• 7 Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013; 15 (07) 565-574
• 8 Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS. et al. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97 (01) 6-21
• 9 Hardin AP, Hackell JM. COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE AND AMBULATORY MEDICINE. Age limit of pediatrics. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (03) e20172151
• 10 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. 18001. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ppacacon.pdf. Accessed 2010
• 11 Grace AM, Horn I, Hall R, Cheng TL. Children, Families, and Disparities: Pediatric Provisions in the Affordable Care Act. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62 (05) 1297-1311
• 12 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Pub. L. 104–191. Stat. 1936. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-104publ191/pdf/PLAW-104publ191.pdf. Accessed August 21, 1996
• 13 US Dept. of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, Personal Health Records and the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/special/healthit/phrs.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2020
• 14 Harman LB, Flite CA, Bond K. Electronic health records: privacy, confidentiality, and security. Virtual Mentor 2012; 14 (09) 712-719
• 15 Bilimoria NM. HIPAA privacy/security rules: where we've been and where we are going. Updates from the HITECH Act to dramatically impact HIPAA privacy/security. J Med Pract Manage 2009; 25 (03) 149-152
• 16 Walsh T, Dougherty M. The 10 security domains (updated). J AHIMA 2012; 83 (05) 48-52
• 17 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Health IT Dashboard. Available at: https://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/quickstats.php. Accessed April 5, 2020
• 18 Jiang JX, Bai G. Evaluation of causes of protected health information breaches. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (02) 265-267
• 19 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, 21st Century Cures Act: interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program, Final Rule. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-05-01/pdf/2020-07419.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2020
• 20 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Health IT for Pediatric Care and Practice Settings. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-pediatric-care-and-practice-settings. Accessed August 1, 2020
• 21 Greene AH. HHS steps up HIPAA audits. J AHIMA 2011; 82 (10) 58-59
• 22 Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST. Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med 2011; 13 (07) 680-685
• 23 Darcy DC, Lewis ET, Ormond KE, Clark DJ, Trafton JA. Practical considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 294
• 24 Hazin R, Brothers KB, Malin BA. et al. Ethical, legal, and social implications of incorporating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet Med 2013; 15 (10) 810-816
• 25 Lantos JD. Ethical and psychosocial issues in whole genome sequencing (WGS) for newborns. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (Suppl. 01) S1-S5
• 26 Bowdin SC, Hayeems RZ, Monfared N, Cohn RD, Meyn MS. The SickKids Genome Clinic: developing and evaluating a pediatric model for individualized genomic medicine. Clin Genet 2016; 89 (01) 10-19
• 27 Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Murry JB, Machini K. BabySeq Project Team. et al. Interpretation of genomic sequencing results in healthy and ill newborns: results from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104 (01) 76-93
• 28 Health Level Seven International, HL7 Version 2.5.1 implementation guide: laboratory orders from EHR (LOI). Published 2018. Available at: https://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/standards/dstu/V251_IG_LABORDERS_R1_STU_R3_2018JUN.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2020
• 29 Cuvo JB, Dinh AK, Fahrenholz CG. et al. Quality data and documentation for EHRs in physician practice. J AHIMA 2008; 79 (08) 43-48
• 30 Swaminathan R, Huang Y, Astbury C. et al. Clinical exome sequencing reports: current informatics practice and future opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (06) 1184-1191
• 31 Shirts BH, Salama JS, Aronson SJ. et al. CSER and eMERGE: current and potential state of the display of genetic information in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1231-1242
• 32 Eno CC, Barton SK, Dorrani N, Cederbaum SD, Deignan JL, Grody WW. Confidential genetic testing and electronic health records: a survey of current practices among Huntington disease testing centers. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8 (01) e1026
• 33 Klitzman R. Exclusion of genetic information from the medical record: ethical and medical dilemmas. JAMA 2010; 304 (10) 1120-1121
• 34 Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-2008. Accessed 2008
• 35 Clayton EW. Why the americans with disabilities act matters for genetics. JAMA 2015; 313 (22) 2225-2226
• 36 Clayton EW, Evans BJ, Hazel JW, Rothstein MA. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations. J Law Biosci 2019; 6 (01) 1-36
• 37 Carroll JC, Allanson J, Morrison S. et al. Informing integration of genomic medicine into primary care: an assessment of current practice, attitudes, and desired resources. Front Genet 2019; 10: 1189
• 38 Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA. Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 2015; 17 (03) 169-176
• 39 Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities: Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series, National Council on Disability. Available at: https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_Organ_Transplant_508.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2019
• 40 Sankar P, Cho MK, Wolpe PR, Schairer C. What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigma. Genet Med 2006; 8 (01) 33-42
• 41 Murray T. Genetic exceptionalism and “future diaries”: is genetic information different from other medical information?. In: Rothstein M. , ed. Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1997: 60-73
• 42 Garrison NA, Brothers KB, Goldenberg AJ, Lynch JA. Genomic contextualism: shifting the rhetoric of genetic exceptionalism. Am J Bioeth 2019; 19 (01) 51-63
• 43 Grootens-Wiegers P, Hein IM, van den Broek JM, de Vries MC. Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects. BMC Pediatr 2017; 17 (01) 120
• 44 Klostermann BK, Slap GB, Nebrig DM, Tivorsak TL, Britto MT. Earning trust and losing it: adolescents' views on trusting physicians. J Fam Pract 2005; 54 (08) 679-687
• 45 McGowan ML, Prows CA, DeJonckheere M, Brinkman WB, Vaughn L, Myers MF. Adolescent and parental attitudes about return of genomic research results: focus group findings regarding decisional preferences. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13 (04) 371-382
• 46 Pervola J, Myers MF, McGowan ML, Prows CA. Giving adolescents a voice: the types of genetic information adolescents choose to learn and why. Genet Med 2019; 21 (04) 965-971
• 47 Classen DC, Mermel LA. Specialty society clinical practice guidelines: time for evolution or revolution?. JAMA 2015; 314 (09) 871-872
• 48 Maslyanskaya S, Alderman EM. Confidentiality and consent in the care of the adolescent patient. Pediatr Rev 2019; 40 (10) 508-516
• 49 Leventhal JC, Cummins JA, Schwartz PH, Martin DK, Tierney WM. Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (01) (Suppl. 01) S17-S24
• 50 Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD. Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8 (02) 151-157
• 51 Esch T, Mejilla R, Anselmo M, Podtschaske B, Delbanco T, Walker J. Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (01) e010034
• 52 Fisher B, Bhavnani V, Winfield M. How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice. J R Soc Med 2009; 102 (12) 539-544
• 53 Davis KA, Smith LB. Ethical considerations about EHR-mediated results disclosure and pathology information presented via patient portals. AMA J Ethics 2016; 18 (08) 826-832
• 54 Haga SB, Mills R, Pollak KI. et al. Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding. Genome Med 2014; 6 (07) 58
• 55 David KL, Best RG, Brenman LM. ACMG Social Ethical Legal Issues Committee. et al. Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2019; 21 (04) 769-771
• 56 Luo J, Wu M, Gopukumar D, Zhao Y. Big data application in biomedical research and health care: a literature review. Biomed Inform Insights 2016; 8: 1-10
• 57 Navarro FCP, Mohsen H, Yan C. et al. Genomics and data science: an application within an umbrella. Genome Biol 2019; 20 (01) 109
• 58 Yang J. Cloud computing for storing and analyzing petabytes of genomic data. J Ind Inf Integr 2019; 15: 50-57
• 59 Walton NA, Johnson DK, Person TN, Chamala S. Genomic data in the electronic health record. Adv Mol Pathol 2019; 2 (01) 21-33
• 60 Bellazzi R. Big data and biomedical informatics: a challenging opportunity. Yearb Med Inform 2014; 9 (01) 8-13
• 61 Alterovitz G, Warner J, Zhang P. et al. SMART on FHIR genomics: facilitating standardized clinico-genomic apps. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1173-1178
• 62 Klinkenberg-Ramirez S, Neri PM, Volk LA. et al. Evaluation: a qualitative pilot study of novel information technology infrastructure to communicate genetic variant updates. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 461-476
• 63 Deckard J, McDonald CJ, Vreeman DJ. Supporting interoperability of genetic data with LOINC. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (03) 621-627
• 64 Uchegbu C, Jing X. The potential adoption benefits and challenges of LOINC codes in a laboratory department: a case study. Health Inf Sci Syst 2017; 5 (01) 6
• 65 Stram M, Gigliotti T, Hartman D. et al. Logical observation identifiers names and codes for laboratorians. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144 (02) 229-239
• 66 Gajanayake R, Iannella R, Sahama T. Privacy oriented access control for electronic health records. Elect J Health Inform 2014; 8 (02) e15
• 67 Lamas E, Barh A, Brown D, Jaulent MC. Ethical, legal and social issues related to the health data-warehouses: re-using health data in the research and public health research. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 210: 719-723
• 68 Ferreira A, Cruz-Correia R, Antunes L, Chadwick D. Access control: how can it improve patients' healthcare?. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 127: 65-76