Counseling During Real Ear Measurements: The Clients' Perspective

Abstract

Background When dispensing hearing aids, audiologists must follow validated fitting and verification procedures to ensure that the hearing aids are properly fitted to the client's hearing. Real ear measurements (REMs) are best practice for verifying hearing aids. Prior literature regarding REMs has mainly focused on the clinicians' perspective.

Purpose This study investigated informational counseling throughout REMs by gathering perspectives of first-time hearing aid users regarding the content and format of counseling.

Research Design The study used an interpretive description approach with focus groups.

Study Sample There were 16 adult participants (4 males, 12 females) who were first-time hearing aid users and who all had memory of REMs occurring during their own hearing aid verification.

Intervention We investigated the addition of informational counseling during REM verification.

Data Collection and Analysis Four focus groups were conducted to elicit feedback on a demonstration of informational counseling during REM hearing aid verification. The data from the focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results Analysis revealed positive aspects, negative aspects, and suggested changes in relation to the verbal and visual information presented during the REM verification demonstration. These data fell into two broad categories: the interaction and transaction of informational counseling.

Conclusion Most clients were interested in learning more about REMs if the information was accessible. Results provide recommendations for clinical audiologists and REM system manufacturers to make the information presented during informational counseling more client-friendly and individualized for client-centered care. To continue exploring this new inquiry, further experimental research is required to determine if there is any added value of incorporating informational counseling during REMs.

Keywords

hearing loss - hearing aids - informational counseling - focus groups

Note

This project was presented at the Canadian Academy of Audiology conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, October 2019.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 21. Juli 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Februar 2021

• References

• 1 Stevens G, Flaxman S, Brunskill E, Mascarenhas M, Mathers CD, Finucane M. Global Burden of Disease Hearing Loss Expert Group. Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries. Eur J Public Health 2013; 23 (01) 146-152
• 2 Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11 (42) 1-294
• 3 Knudsen LV, Oberg M, Nielsen C, Naylor G, Kramer SE. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif 2010; 14 (03) 127-154
• 4 Gopinath B, Schneider J, Hartley D. et al. Incidence and predictors of hearing aid use and ownership among older adults with hearing loss. Ann Epidemiol 2011; 21 (07) 497-506
• 5 Vuorialho A, Karinen P, Sorri M. Counselling of hearing aid users is highly cost-effective. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 263 (11) 988-995
• 6 Valente M, Abrams H, Benson D. et al. Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. Audiol Today 2006; 18: 1-44
• 7 Leavitt RJ, Flexer C. The importance of audibility in successful amplification of hearing loss: reprogramming hearing aids from first-fit settings makes a huge positive impact. Hear Rev 2012; 19 (13) 20-23
• 8 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: reducing patient visits through verification & validation: V & V can eliminate the need for over 521,000 patient refitting visits annually. Hear Rev 2011; 18 (06) 10-12
• 9 Amlani AM, Pumford J, Gessling E. Improving patient perception of clinical services through real-ear measurements. Hear Rev 2016; 23 (12) 12
• 10 Smriga D. (2015, May 26) Speechmap as a counseling and fitting tool. AudiologyOnline, Article 14232. Accessed September 10, 2020 at: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/speechmap-as-counseling-and-fitting-14232
• 11 Margolis RH. Boosting memory with informational counseling: helping patients understand the nature of disorders and how to manage them. ASHA Lead 2004; 9 (14) 10-28
• 12 Makhoba M, Joseph N. Practices and views of audiologists regarding aural rehabilitation services for adults with acquired hearing loss. S Afr J Commun Disord 2016; 63 (01) e1-e10
• 13 Saunders GH, Forsline A. Hearing-aid counseling: comparison of single-session informational counseling with single-session performance-perceptual counseling. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (10) 754-764
• 14 Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, Ehrnrooth E, Rossen PB, von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer 2003; 88 (05) 658-665
• 15 Ulin K, Malm D, Nygårdh A. What is known about the benefits of patient-centered care in patients with heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2015; 12 (06) 350-359
• 16 Hendriks M, Dahlhaus-Booij J, Plass AM. Clients' perspective on quality of audiology care: development of the consumer quality index (CQI) ‘Audiology Care’ for measuring client experiences. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (01) 8-15
• 17 Canadian Council on Learning. Health literacy in Canada: a healthy understanding. 2008. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Learning; Accessed September 10, 2020 at: http://www.en.copian.ca/library/research/ccl/health/health.pdf
• 18 Thorne S. Interpretive Description: Qualitative Research for Applied Practice. 2nd ed.. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016
• 19 Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage; 2011: 97-128
• 20 Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20 (04) 306-320
• 21 Cox RM, Alexander GC. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear 2001; 22 (02) 151-160
• 22 Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002
• 23 Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24 (02) 105-112
• 24 Hadi MA, José Closs S. Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy. Int J Clin Pharm 2016; 38 (03) 641-646
• 25 Walsh IP. Small talk is “Big talk” in clinical discourse: appreciating the value of conversation in SLP clinical interactions. Top Lang Disord 2007; 27: 24-36
• 26 Pichora-Fuller K, Johnson C, Roodenburg KE. The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. J Appl Commun Res 1998; 26: 99-119
• 27 Nair EL, Cienkowski KM. The impact of health literacy on patient understanding of counseling and education materials. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (02) 71-75
• 28 Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, Davidson B. Patient-centred audiological rehabilitation: perspectives of older adults who own hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (Suppl. 01) S68-S75
• 29 Carollo S. Low health literacy in older women: the influence of patient-clinician relationships. Geriatr Nurs 2015; 36 (2, Suppl): S38-S42
• 30 Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS. Understanding health literacy: an expanded model. Health Promot Int 2005; 20 (02) 195-203
• 31 Rootman I, Gordon-El-Bihbety D. A vision for a health literate Canada: report of the expert panel on health literacy. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association; 2008. . Accessed September 10, 2020 at: https://www.cpha.ca/vision-health-literate-canada-report-expert-panel-health-literacy
• 32 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Hearing Health Care for Adults: Priorities for Improving Access and Affordability. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016
• 33 Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2015