Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(01): 003-009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719092
Research Article

Acceptable Noise Levels Determined by Traditional and Self-Assessed Methods

Megan Barnett
1   Department of Communication Disorders, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
,
Alisha L. Jones
1   Department of Communication Disorders, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
,
Erin Westbrook
1   Department of Communication Disorders, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Many apps have been developed for users to screen their hearing in their own home. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and efficiency of a self-assessed acceptable noise level (ANL) in comparison to the traditional ANL measurements.

Research Design A within-subject repeated measures research design was utilized.

Data Collection and Analysis Sixty-two adults with normal hearing were recruited from Auburn University and the surrounding community. ANLs were measured utilizing the traditional measurement as well as the self-assessed ANL via the Unitron uHear app.

Results Within-subject repeated measures of variance revealed no significant differences between traditional ANL measurements and self-assessed ANL measurements. Significant differences were found for time required for testing in each condition, revealing self-assessed testing to be significantly faster.

Conclusion The self-assessed ANL measurement via the Unitron uHear app is a valid and efficient measurement of ANL in adults with normal hearing.

Keywords

hearing aids - assistive listening devices - acceptable noise levels

Note

Parts of this manuscript were presented as a poster at the 2018 American Academy of Audiology conference in Nashville, TN.




Publication History

Received: 02 January 2019

Accepted: 21 April 2020

Article published online:
15 February 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Nabelek AK, Tucker FM, Letowski TR. Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34 (03) 679-685
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Freyaldenhoven MC, Plyler PN, Thelin JW, Hedrick MS. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50 (04) 878-885
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, Burchfiel SB, Muenchen RA. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17 (09) 626-639
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Nabelek AK, Tampas JW, Burchfield SB. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47 (05) 1001-1011
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Olsen SO, Brännström KJ. Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (01) 2-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wu YH, Stangl E, Pang C, Zhang X. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25 (02) 141-153
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Aghsoleimani M, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi ME, Nazeri AR, Kamali M. The acceptable noise level benefit from directionality for listeners with severe hearing loss. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 11 (03) 166-173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Freyaldenhoven MC, Nabelek AK, Burchfield SB, Thelin JW. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (04) 228-236
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kim JS, Bryan MF. The effects of asymmetric directional microphone fittings on acceptance of background noise. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (05) 290-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kim JH, Lee JH, Lee HK. Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 7 (02) 94-101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Lowery KJ, Plyler PN. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Audiol 2013; 24 (08) 649-659
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Peeters H, Kuk F, Lau CC, Keenan D. Subjective and objective evaluation of noise management algorithms. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (02) 89-98
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wu YH, Stangl E. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (03) 333-341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fredelake S, Holube I, Schlueter A, Hansen M. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (04) 299-308
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Mueller HG, Weber J, Hornsby BW. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (02) 83-93
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wong LLN, Chen Y, Wang Q, Kuehnel V. Efficacy of a hearing aid noise reduction function. Trends Hear 2018; 22: 2331216518782839
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Neher T, Wagener KC. Investigating differences in preferred noise reduction strength among hearing aid users. Trends Hear 2016; 20: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gordon-Hickey S, Morlas H. Speech recognition at the acceptable noise level. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (05) 443-450
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Recker KL, Micheyl C. Speech intelligibility as a cue for acceptable noise levels. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (04) 465-474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Franklin C, Johnson LV, White L, Franklin C, Smith-Olinde L. The relationship between personality type and acceptable noise levels: a pilot study. ISRN Otolaryngol 2013; 2013: 902532
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Nichols AC, Gordon-Hickey S. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (04) 353-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Plyler PN, Bahng J, von Hapsburg D. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (02) 502-515
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Plyler PN, Madix SG, Thelin JW, Johnston KW. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Am J Audiol 2007; 16 (02) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Brännström KJ, Olsen SO, Holm L, Kastberg T, Ibertsson T. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (11) 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Freyaldenhoven M, Smiley D. Acceptance of background noise in children with normal hearing. J Educ Audiol 2006; 13: 28-32
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE. Influence of music and music preference on acceptable noise levels in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (05) 417-427
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Harkrider AW, Smith SB. Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (08) 530-545
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Johnson E, Ricketts T, Hornsby B. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (06) 353-362
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Richardson BE. The Effect of Processing Abilities on Acceptable Noise Levels. Ruston, LA: Louisiana Tech University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2015: 3664377
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Rogers DS, Harkrider AW, Burchfield SB, Nabelek AK. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14 (07) 372-382 , quiz 401
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 von Hapsburg D, Bahng J. Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17 (09) 649-658
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 American National Standards Institute, Maximum Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Room (ANSI S3. 1–1999). New York: American National Standards Institute; 1999
  • 33 American National Standards Institute, Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3. 6–1996). New York: American National Standards Institute; 1996
  • 34 Franklin Jr CA, Thelin JW, Nabelek AK, Burchfield SB. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17 (02) 141-146
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Olsen SØ, Nielsen LH, Lantz J, Brännström KJ. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (07) 557-563
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Brännström KJ, Olsen SO. The acceptable noise level and the pure-tone audiogram. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (01) 80-87
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar