CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2020; 42(12): 820-828
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719147
Original Article
Mastology

Sociodemographic and Clinical-pathological Study of Molecular Subtitles of Breast Carcinoma in a Reference Unit of Maranhão

Estudo sociodemográfico e clínico-patológico de legendas moleculares de carcinoma de mama em uma unidade de referência do Maranhão
1   Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Imperatriz, MA, Brazil
,
1   Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Imperatriz, MA, Brazil
,
1   Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Imperatriz, MA, Brazil
,
1   Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Imperatriz, MA, Brazil
,
1   Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Imperatriz, MA, Brazil
,
1   Centro de Ciências Sociais, Saúde e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Imperatriz, MA, Brazil
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the distribution of the main sociodemographic and clinical-pathological characteristics in women with breast cancer according to the molecular profile by immunohistochemistry.

Methods A cross-sectional, retrospective, analytical and quantitative study was performed, with an analysis of 137 medical records from January 2015 to December 2018 of women attending the High Complexity in Oncology Unit of the city of Imperatriz, state of Maranhão, Brazil. The immunohistochemical profile of tumors based on the estrogen and progesterone receptor, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor-type 2 (HER2) overexpression and Ki67 cell proliferation index was defined, from which six molecular subtypes were determined: luminal A, luminal B-HER2 negative, luminal B-HER2 positive, triple negative, overexpression of HER2 and inconclusive.

Results A total of 52.6% of the patients were postmenopausal, mean age 52.1 years old, brown (56.2%), had a schooling level < 9 years (40%), staging > IIB (52.6%) and 23.4% had metastasis. Invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 84.7%, tumor size was 2 to 5 cm (48.9%), with lymph node involvement (56.2%), axillary lymphadenectomy in 67.2%, and mastectomy in 73.7% of the patients. The most frequent molecular subtype was the luminal B-HER2 negative (36.5%), and the luminal A subtype showed characteristics of better prognosis when compared with the others.

Conclusion It was concluded that in the association of molecular subtypes with sociodemographic and clinical-pathological characteristics, there were no statistically significant results obtained, except for complementary therapy, referring to hormone therapy, and there was a high index of metastasis at diagnosis, which was a worrying factor and indicative of failures in the screening and early diagnosis of this population.

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar a distribuição das principais características sociodemográficas e clínico-patológicas em mulheres com câncer de mama segundo o perfil molecular pela imunohistoquímica.

Métodos Estudo transversal, retrospectivo, analítico, descritivo e quantitativo, com análise de 137 prontuários do período de janeiro de 2015 a dezembro de 2018 de mulheres atendidas na Unidade de Assistência da Alta Complexidade em Oncologia da cidade de Imperatriz, MA, Brasil. Foi definido o perfil imunohistoquímico dos tumores baseado na avaliação dos receptores de estrogênio e progesterona, superexpressão de HER2 e índice de proliferação celular Ki67, de onde foram determinados seis subtipos moleculares: luminal A, luminal B-HER2 negativo, luminal B-HER2 positivo, triplo negativo, superexpressão de HER2 e inconclusivo.

Resultados Foi demonstrado que 52,6% das pacientes eram pós-menopausadas, com idade média de 52,1 anos, pardas (56,2%), tinham grau de escolaridade < 9 anos (40%), estadiamento > IIB (52,6%) e 23,4% tinham metástase. Carcinoma ductal invasivo representou 84,7%, o tamanho tumoral foi de 2 a 5 cm (48,9%), com comprometimento linfonodal (56,2%), com linfadenectomia axilar em 67,2% e mastectomia em 73,7% das pacientes. O subtipo molecular mais frequente foi o luminal B-HER2 negativo (36,5%), e o subtipo luminal A apresentou características de melhor prognóstico em relação aos demais.

Conclusão Concluiu-se que na associação dos subtipos moleculares com as características sociodemográficas e clínico-patológicas não se obteve resultados com significância estatística, exceto para terapia complementar, referente à hormonioterapia, e houve elevado índice de metástase ao diagnóstico, o que representou um fator preocupante e indicativo de falhas no rastreio e diagnóstico precoce dessa população.

Contributions

Conception and design: Reis A. P. A. M., Teixeira C. M. S., Medeiros A. R. L., Chaves K. Z. C..


Data collection: Reis A. P. A. M., Melo M. R., Albuquerque C. R..


Analysis and interpretation of data: Reis A. P. A. M., Teixeira C. M. S., Medeiros A. R. L., Chaves K. Z. C., Melo M. R., Albuquerque C. R..


Writing of the article: Reis A. P. A. M., Teixeira C. M. S., Albuquerque C. R., Melo M. R..


Critical review of the intellectual content: Sousa C. M., Medeiros A. R. L., Chaves K. Z. C..


Final approval of the version to be published: Reis A. P. A. M., Teixeira C. M. S., Medeiros A. R. L., Chaves K. Z. C., Albuquerque C. R., Melo M. R,.




Publication History

Received: 26 March 2020

Accepted: 17 September 2020

Article published online:
21 December 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Ferreira LF, Petel LA, Fernandes SS. A história natural do câncer de mama na paciente jovem: revisão de literatura. Femina 2011; 39 (11) 527-531
  • 2 Rupp J, Hadamitzky C, Henkenberens C, Christiansen H, Steinmann D, Bruns F. Frequency and risk factors for arm lymphedema after multimodal breast-conserving treatment of nodal positive breast Cancer - a long-term observation. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14 (01) 39
  • 3 Ministério da Saúde, Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2018: incidência de câncer no Brasil [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 12]. Available from: https://portaldeboaspraticas.iff.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/estimativa-incidencia-de-cancer-no-brasil-2018.pdf
  • 4 Dai X, Li T, Bai Z, Yang Y, Liu X, Zhan J, Shi B. Breast cancer intrinsic subtype classification, clinical use and future trends. Am J Cancer Res 2015; 5 (10) 2929-2943
  • 5 Cintra JRD, Teixeira MT, Diniz RW, Junior HG, Florentino TM, Freitas GF. et al. Immunohistochemical profile and clinical-pathological variables in breast cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2012; 58 (02) 178-187
  • 6 Serra KP, Ramalho S, Torresan R, Vassalo J, Sarian LOZ, Silva GRP, Derchain S. [The new classification of breast cancers: finding the luminal A]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2014; 36 (12) 575-580
  • 7 Vallejos CS, Gómez HL, Cruz WR, Pinto JA, Dyer RR, Velarde R. et al. Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemistry markers: subtypes and association with clinicopathologic variables in a peruvian hospital database. Clin Breast Cancer 2010; 10 (04) 294-300
  • 8 Anderson WF, Jatoi I, Devesa SS. Distinct breast cancer incidence and prognostic patterns in the NCI's SEER program: suggesting a possible link between etiology and outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 90 (02) 127-137
  • 9 Hortobagyi GN, Connolly JL, D'Orsi CJ. et al. Breast. In: Amin MB. editor. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed.. London: Springer; 2017: 589-636
  • 10 Corp IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 24.0 [software]. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2016
  • 11 Gibbons JD, Chakraborti S. Nonparametric statistical inference. 5th ed.. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010
  • 12 Farina A, Almeida LLR, Paula LEJ, Medeiros RV, Silva MR, Sommavilla SB. Perfil epidemiológico, clínico, anátomo patológico e imunohistoquímico das pacientes com câncer de mama em Cuiabá (MT). Rev Bras Mastol 2016; 27 (01) 74-79
  • 13 Magalhães G, Brandão-Souza C, Fustinoni SM, Matos JC, Schirmer J. Perfil clínico, sociodemográfico e epidemiológico da mulher com câncer de mama. Rev Pesqui 2017; 9 (02) 473-479
  • 14 Rocha FS, Silva WS, Nascimento ER, Bacciotti AM. Epidemiological profile of breast cancer in a reference hospital in the north region. Mastology 2018; 28 (03) 169-175
  • 15 Setiawan VW, Monroe KR, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN, Pike MC, Henderson BE. Breast cancer risk factors defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: the multiethnic cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 169 (10) 1251-1259
  • 16 Llanos AAM, Chandwani S, Bandera EV, Hirschfield KM, Lin Y, Ambrosone CB, Demissie K. Associations between sociodemographic and clinicopathological factors and breast cancer subtypes in a population-based study. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26 (12) 1737-1750
  • 17 Haddad NC, Carvalho ACA, Novaes CO. Perfil sociodemográfico e de saúde de mulheres submetidas à cirurgia para câncer de mama Materiais e métodos. Rev HUPE 2015; 14 (Suppl. 01) 28-35
  • 18 Fayer VA, Guerra MR, Cintra JRD, Bustamante-Teixeira MT. Ten-year survival and prognostic factors for breast cancer in the southeast region of Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2016; 19 (04) 766-778
  • 19 Migowski A, Stein AT, Ferreira CBT, Ferreira DMTP, Nadanovsky P. Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. I - Development methods. Cad Saude Publica 2018; 34 (06) e00116317
  • 20 García-Novoa A, Acea-Nebril B, Casal-Beloy I, Bouzón-Alejandro A, Garea CC, Gómez-Dovigo A. et al. El declive de la linfadenectomía axilar en el cáncer de mama. Evolución de su indicación durante los últimos 20 años. Cir Esp 2019; 97 (04) 222-229
  • 21 Pires EDLS, Morais LM, Pires ADLS, Matsuda LO, Matsuda JB, Alves ARM. Prognostic factors in breast cancer: from staging to the immunohistochemical profile of patients with breast cancer in a reference hospital of Ceara - Brazil. Int Arch Med Microbiol 2018; 1 (01) 1-5
  • 22 Carvalho FM, Bacchi LM, Pincerato KM, Van de Rijn M, Bacchi CE. Geographic differences in the distribution of molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Brazil. BMC Womens Health 2014; 14: 102
  • 23 Cherbal F, Gaceb H, Mehemmai C, Saiah I, Bakour R, Rouis AO. et al. Distribution of molecular breast cancer subtypes among Algerian women and correlation with clinical and tumor characteristics: a population-based study. Breast Dis 2015; 35 (02) 95-102
  • 24 Park S, Koo JS, Kim MS, Park HS, Lee JS, Lee JS. et al. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry. Breast 2012; 21 (01) 50-57
  • 25 Blows FM, Driver KE, Schmidt MK, Broeks A, van Leeuwen FE, Wesseling J. et al. Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med 2010; 7 (05) e1000279
  • 26 Barreto-Neto NJS, Pinheiro AB, Oliveira JF. et al. Perfil epidemiológico dos subtipos moleculares de carcinoma ductal da mama em população de pacientes em Salvador, Bahia. Rev Bras Mastologia 2014; 24 (04) 98-102
  • 27 Franzoi MA, Schwartsmann G, de Azevedo SJ, Geib G, Zaffaroni F, Liedke PER. Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis by ethnicity, insurance status, and family income in young women in the USA. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2019; 6 (05) 909-916
  • 28 Ito EJ, Safar AS. Epidemiological profile of the mastology clinic in a university of Paraná. Mastology 2017; 27 (04) 293-299
  • 29 Tonellotto F, Bergmann A, de Souza Abrahão K, de Aguiar SS, Bello MA, Thuler LCS. Impact of number of positive lymph node and lymph node ratio on survival of women with node-positive breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health 2019; 15 (02) 76-84
  • 30 Abrahão KdeS, Bergmann A, Aguiar SS, Thuler LCS. Determinants of advanced stage presentation of breast cancer in 87,969 Brazilian women. Maturitas 2015; 82 (04) 365-370
  • 31 Joko-Fru WY, Miranda-Filho A, Soerjomataram I, Egue M, Akele-Akpo M-T, N'da G. et al. Breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan Africa by age, stage at diagnosis and human development index: A population-based registry study. Int J Cancer 2020; 146 (05) 1208-1218
  • 32 Dos-Santos-Silva I, De Stavola BL, Renna Junior NL, Nogueira MC, Aquino EML, Bustamente-Teixeira MT, Silva GA. Ethnoracial and social trends in breast cancer staging at diagnosis in Brazil, 2001-14: a case only analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7 (06) e784-e797
  • 33 Ignatov A, Eggemann H, Burger E, Ignatov T. Patterns of breast cancer relapse in accordance to biological subtype. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144 (07) 1347-1355
  • 34 Tong Y, Chen X, Fei X, Lin L, Wu J, Huang O. et al. Can breast cancer patients with HER2 dual-equivocal tumours be managed as HER2-negative disease?. Eur J Cancer 2018; 89: 9-18
  • 35 Xu FP, Wang K, Xu J, Chen J, Zhang Y-F, Wu H-M. et al. Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166 (03) 757-764