Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Deformity Correction in the Upper Cervical Spine: A Technical Note

Abstract

Background Kyphosis is the most common deformity of the cervical spine leading to development of severe disabilities. In case of fused kyphosis, surgical treatment can be demanding and often requires multiple-step procedures for adequate correction. We present a technique of single-stage pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) of C3 to treat a patient with fused kyphosis of C2 and C3 causing spinal stenosis with subsequent myelopathy.

Methods A 53-year-old man presented with progressive myelopathy not able to walk with 6/18 points on the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale. Horizontal gaze was lost due to cervical kyphosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a cervical kyphosis causing stenosis, cord compression, and kinking; computed tomography (CT) showed substantial anterior and posterior fusion of C2 and C3.

Results Surgery included decompression via laminectomy of C2 to C6 in combination with PSO of C3 and additional dorsal instrumentation of C2 to C6. Cervical spinal alignment was corrected, as the C2–C4 Cobb angle was reduced from 48.9 to 20.6 degrees. Horizontal gaze was restored. Postoperative MRI demonstrated full decompression of the cord without kinking of the vertebral arteries. No complications were noted. The patient recovered well with restoration of his ability to walk.

Conclusion Single-stage pedicle subtraction closing wedge osteotomy in the upper cervical spine, although a demanding surgical procedure, is an alternative treatment option in selected cases of fused and severe cervical kyphosis. In contrast to multiple-step approaches, the single-stage procedure could reduce operating time and may thus decrease complications.

Keywords

adult cervical deformity - cervical spondylotic myelopathy - pedicle subtraction osteotomy

Publication History

Received: 30 December 2019

Accepted: 12 May 2020

Article published online:
14 February 2021

• References

• 1 Lee JS, Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Kang SS. Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (06) 1199-1203
• 2 Shamji MF, Ames CP, Smith JS, Rhee JM, Chapman JR, Fehlings MG. Myelopathy and spinal deformity: relevance of spinal alignment in planning surgical intervention for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine 2013; 38 (22, Suppl 1): S147-S148
• 3 Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R. et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11 (05) 521-528
• 4 Nemani VM, Derman PB, Kim HJ. Osteotomies in the cervical spine. Asian Spine J 2016; 10 (01) 184-195
• 5 Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK. International Spine Study Group. et al; A standardized nomenclature for cervical spine soft-tissue release and osteotomy for deformity correction: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2013; 19 (03) 269-278
• 6 Wollowick AL, Kelly MP, Riew KD. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the cervical spine. Spine 2012; 37 (05) E342-E348
• 7 Tan LA, Riew KD, Traynelis VC. Cervical spine deformity-part 1: biomechanics, radiographic parameters, and classification. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (02) 197-203
• 8 Kim HC, Jun HS, Kim JH. et al. The effect of different pillow heights on the parameters of cervicothoracic spine segments. Korean J Spine 2015; 12 (03) 135-138
• 9 Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A. et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (01) 78-84
• 10 Tan LA, Riew KD, Traynelis VC. Cervical spine deformity-part 2: management algorithm and anterior techniques. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (04) 561-567
• 11 Tan LA, Riew KD, Traynelis VC. Cervical spine deformity-part 3: posterior techniques, clinical outcome, and complications. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (06) 893-898
• 12 Dru AB, Lockney DT, Vaziri S. et al. Cervical spine deformity correction techniques. Neurospine 2019; 16 (03) 470-482
• 13 Smith JS, Ramchandran S, Lafage V. International Spine Study Group. et al; Prospective multicenter assessment of early complication rates associated with adult cervical deformity surgery in 78 patients. Neurosurgery 2016; 79 (03) 378-388
• 14 Suk SI, Kim JH, Lee SM, Chung ER, Lee JH. Anterior-posterior surgery versus posterior closing wedge osteotomy in posttraumatic kyphosis with neurologic compromised osteoporotic fracture. Spine 2003; 28 (18) 2170-2175
• 15 Kawahara N, Tomita K, Kobayashi T, Abdel-Wanis ME, Murakami H, Akamaru T. Influence of acute shortening on the spinal cord: an experimental study. Spine 2005; 30 (06) 613-620
• 16 Yang X, He S, Yang J. et al. One-Stage wedge osteotomy through posterolateral approach for cervical postlaminectomy kyphosis with anterior fusion. World Neurosurg 2018; 119: 45-51
• 17 Post N, Naziri Q, Cooper CS, Pivec R, Paulino CB. Pedicle reduction osteotomy in the upper cervical spine: technique, case report and review of the literature. Int J Spine Surg 2015; 9: 57
• 18 Schipmann S, Akalin E, Doods J, Ewelt C, Stummer W, Suero Molina E. When the infection hits the wound: matched case-control study in a neurosurgical patient collective including systematic literature review and risk factors analysis. World Neurosurg 2016; 95: 178-189