Impact of Homeopathic Treatment on the Quality of Life of Women with Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Pragmatic Trial

Abstract

Background Despite the increasing demand for complementary and integrative medicine, only a few studies have evaluated the effect of these types of treatments on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the QoL of women treated with homeopathy within the Public Health System of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Methods This is a prospective randomized controlled pragmatic trial. The patients were divided into two independent groups, one group underwent homeopathic treatment in the first 6-month period and the other did not receive any homeopathic treatment. In both randomized groups, patients maintained their conventional medical treatment when necessary. The World Health Organization Quality of Life abbreviated questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) was used for QoL analysis prior to treatment and 6 months later.

Results Randomization afforded similar baseline results in three domains of QoL analysis for both groups. After 6 months' treatment, there was a statistically significant difference between groups in the physical domain of WHOQOL-BREF: the average score improved to 63.6 ± (SD) 15.8 in the homeopathy group, compared with 53.1 ± (SD) 16.7 in the control group.

Conclusions Homeopathic treatment showed a positive impact at 6 months on the QoL of women with chronic diseases. Further studies should be performed to determine the long-term effects of homeopathic treatment on QoL and its determinant factors.

Keywords

complementary and integrative medicine - homeopathy - quality of life - randomized controlled trial

• References

• 1 Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124
• 2 Califf RM, Sugarman J. Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials. Clin Trials 2015; 12: 436-441
• 3 Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. Natl Health Stat Rep 2015; 1-16
• 4 Rossi E, Di Stefano M, Picchi M. et al. Integration of homeopathy and complementary medicine in the Tuscan Public Health System and the experience of the Homeopathic Clinic of the Lucca Hospital. Homeopathy 2018; 107: 90-98
• 5 Teixeira MZ, Podgaec S, Baracat EC. Potentized estrogen in homeopathic treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 211: 48-55
• 6 The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 551-558
• 7 Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M. et al. [Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-BREF]. Rev Saude Publica 2000; 34: 178-183
• 8 Ghosh S, Das S, Mundle M. et al. An open label pilot study testing the role of classical homeopathy in chronic allergic rhinitis. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013; 4: 1475-1484
• 9 Thompson EA, Reilly D. The homeopathic approach to the treatment of symptoms of oestrogen withdrawal in breast cancer patients. A prospective observational study. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 131-134
• 10 Muscari-Tomaioli G, Allegri F, Miali E. et al. Observational study of quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment. Br Homeopath J 2001; 90: 189-197
• 11 Frass M, Friehs H, Thallinger C. et al. Influence of adjunctive classical homeopathy on global health status and subjective wellbeing in cancer patients—a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med 2015; 23: 309-317