Electronic Task Management System: A Pediatric Institution's Experience

Abstract

Background Electronic medical task management systems (ETMs) have been adopted in health care institutions to improve health care provider communication. ETMs allow for the requesting and resolution of nonurgent tasks between clinicians of all craft groups. Visibility, ability to provide close-loop feedback, and a digital trail of all decisions and responsible clinicians are key features of ETMs. An embedded ETM within an integrated electronic health record (EHR) was introduced to the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne on April 30, 2016. The ETM is used hospital-wide for nonurgent tasks 24 hours a day. It facilitates communication of nonurgent tasks between clinical staff, with an associated designated timeframe in which the task needs to be completed (2, 4, and 8 hours).

Objective This study aims to examine the usage of the ETM at our institution since its inception.

Methods ETM usage data from the first 3 years of use (April 2016 to April 2019) were extracted from the EHR. Data collected included age of patient, date and time of task request, ward, unit, type of task, urgency of task, requestor role, and time to completion.

Results A total of 136,481 tasks were placed via the ETM in the study period. There were approximately 125 tasks placed each day (24-hour period). The most common time of task placement was around 6:00 p.m. Task placement peaked at approximately 8 a.m., 2 p.m., and 9 p.m.—consistent with nursing shift change times. In total, 63.16% of tasks were placed outside business hours, indicating predominant usage for after-hours task communication. The ETM was most highly utilized by surgical units. The majority of tasks were ordered by nurses for medical staff to complete (97.01%). A significant proportion (98.79%) of tasks was marked as complete on the ETM, indicating closed-loop feedback after tasks were requested.

Conclusion An ETM function embedded in our EHR has been highly utilized in our institution since its introduction. It has multiple benefits for the clinician in the form of efficiencies in workflow and improvement in communication and also workflow management. By allowing collection, tracking, audit, and prioritization of tasks, it also provides a stream of actionable data for quality-improvement activities.

Keywords

electronic task management - ETM - electronic health record

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

There were no human subjects involved in the project.

Authors' Contributions

D.R.C. developed the concept for the study. D.R.C. and M.S. were involved in the audit and development of the ETM tool. D.R.C. and M.S. were involved in the drafting, editing, and proofing of the manuscript.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. August 2020

Angenommen: 17. Oktober 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Dezember 2020

• References

• 1 Ongenae F, Vanhove T, De Backere F, De Turck F. Intelligent task management platform for health care workers. Inform Health Soc Care 2017; 42 (02) 122-134
• 2 Whitehead NJ, Maharaj ON, Agrez M. A computer-based task management system for junior medical officers during after-hours shifts. Med J Aust 2014; 200 (02) 79-80
• 3 Patel R, Reilly K, Old A, Naden G, Child S. Appropriate use of pagers in a New Zealand tertiary hospital. N Z Med J 2006; 119 (1231): U1912
• 4 Marshall S, Warren B, Roodenburg O. et al. An electronic task management (ETM) system for after hours hospital work and subsequent socially mediated effects of task completion. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2016; 60 (01) 566-570
• 5 Gabow PA, Karkhanis A, Knight A, Dixon P, Eisert S, Albert RK. Observations of residents' work activities for 24 consecutive hours: implications for workflow redesign. Acad Med 2006; 81 (08) 766-775
• 6 Wu DTY, Vennemeyer S, Brown K. et al. Usability testing of an interactive dashboard for surgical quality improvement in a large congenital heart center. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 859-869
• 7 Przybylo JA, Wang A, Loftus P, Evans KH, Chu I, Shieh L. Smarter hospital communication: secure smartphone text messaging improves provider satisfaction and perception of efficacy, workflow. J Hosp Med 2014; 9 (09) 573-578
• 8 Wu RC, Lo V, Morra D. et al. The intended and unintended consequences of communication systems on general internal medicine inpatient care delivery: a prospective observational case study of five teaching hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (04) 766-777
• 9 Trebble TM, Hansi N, Hydes T, Smith MA, Baker M. Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction. BMJ 2010; 341: c4078
• 10 Weigl M, Müller A, Zupanc A, Glaser J, Angerer P. Hospital doctors' workflow interruptions and activities: an observation study. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20 (06) 491-497
• 11 Seddon ME, Hay D. Task Manager: an innovative approach to improving hospital communication after hours. N Z Med J 2010; 123 (1324): 57-66
• 12 Foo E, McDonald R, Savage E. et al. Mobile task management tool that improves workflow of an acute general surgical service. ANZ J Surg 2015; 85 (10) 760-765
• 13 Dalal AK, Roy CL, Poon EG. et al. Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (03) 473-480
• 14 Georgiou A, Lymer S, Forster M. et al. Lessons learned from the introduction of an electronic safety net to enhance test result management in an Australian mothers' hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (06) 1104-1108