Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2021; 56(02): 181-191
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721363
Artigo Original
Mão

Diagnosis and Treatment of Trigger Finger in Brazil – A Cross-Sectional Study[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Paulo Henrique Jeronimo da Silva 
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
,
Vinícius Ynoe de Moraes 
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
,
Nicolau Granado Segre 
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
,
Edson Sasahara Sato 
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
,
Flávio Faloppa 
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
,
João Carlos Belloti 
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the therapeutic planning for trigger finger by Brazilian orthopedists.

Methods This is a cross-sectional study with a population composed of participants from the 2018 Brazilian Congress on Orthopedics and Traumatology (CBOT-2018, in the Portuguese acronym), who answered a questionnaire about the conduct adopted for trigger finger diagnosis and treatment.

Results A total of 243 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 37.46 years old; most participants were male (88%), with at least 1 year of experience (55.6%) and from Southeast Brazil (68.3%). Questionnaire analysis revealed a consensus on the following issues: diagnosis based on physical examination alone (73.3%), use of the Quinnell classification modified by Green (58.4%), initial nonsurgical treatment (91.4%), infiltration of steroids combined with an anesthetic agent (61.7%), nonsurgical treatment time ranging from 1 to 3 months (52.3%), surgical treatment using the open approach (84.4%), mainly the transverse open approach (51%), triggering recurrence as the main nonsurgical complication (58%), and open surgery success in > 90% of the cases (63%), with healing intercurrences (54%) as the main complication. There was no consensus on the remaining variables. Orthopedists with different practicing times disagree on treatment duration (p = 0.013) and on the complication rate of open surgery (p = 0.010).

Conclusions Brazilian orthopedists prefer to diagnose trigger finger with physical examination alone, to classify it according to the Quinnell method modified by Green, to institute an initial nonsurgical treatment, to perform infiltrations with steroids and local anesthetic agents, to sustain the nonsurgical treatment for 1 to 3 months, and to perform the surgical treatment using a transverse open approach; in addition, they state that the main nonsurgical complication was triggering recurrence, and report open surgery success in > 90% of the cases, with healing intercurrences as the main complication.

Keywords

trigger finger - questionnaire - cross-sectional study - stenosing tenosynovitis

* Study developed at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.




Publication History

Received: 14 November 2019

Accepted: 16 September 2020

Article published online:
26 April 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Yang TH, Chen HC, Liu YC. et al. Clinical and pathological correlates of severity classifications in trigger fingers based on computer-aided image analysis. Biomed Eng Online 2014; 13 (01) 100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Clapham PJ, Chung KC. A historical perspective of the Notta's node in trigger fingers. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (08) 1518-1522
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sato ES, Gomes Dos Santos JB, Belloti JC, Albertoni WM, Faloppa F. Treatment of trigger finger: randomized clinical trial comparing the methods of corticosteroid injection, percutaneous release and open surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51 (01) 93-99
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Saldana MJ. Trigger digits: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9 (04) 246-252
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Marij Z, Aurangzeb Q, Rizwan HR, Haroon R, Pervaiz MH. Outpatient Percutaneous Release of Trigger Finger: A Cost Effective and Safe Procedure. Malays Orthop J 2017; 11 (01) 52-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 de Freitas Novais Junior RA, Bacelar Costa JR, de Morais Carmo JM. Use of adrenalin with lidocaine in hand surgery. Rev Bras Ortop 2014; 49 (05) 452-460
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Freiberg A, Mulholland RS, Levine R. Nonoperative treatment of trigger fingers and thumbs. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (03) 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Giordano M, Giordano V, Giordano J. Tratamento do dedo em gatilho pela injecao local de corticosteroide. Rev Bras Ortop 1997; 32 (12) 971-974
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kameyama M, Meguro S, Funae O, Atsumi Y, Ikegami H. The presence of limited joint mobility is significantly associated with multiple digit involvement by stenosing flexor tenosynovitis in diabetics. J Rheumatol 2009; 36 (08) 1686-1690
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Makkouk AH, Oetgen ME, Swigart CR, Dodds SD. Trigger finger: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008; 1 (02) 92-96
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wang J, Zhao JG, Liang CC. Percutaneous release, open surgery, or corticosteroid injection, which is the best treatment method for trigger digits?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (06) 1879-1886
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Sato ES, dos Santos JB, Belloti JC, Albertoni WMFF, Faloppa F. Percutaneous release of trigger fingers. Hand Clin 2014; 30 (01) 39-45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Mehlmann FM, Ferraro LH, Sousa PC, Cunha GP, Bergamaschi EC, Takeda A. Bloqueios seletivos guiados por ultrassom para cirurgias de dedo em gatilho para manutenção da flexão/extensão dos dedos – Série de casos. Braz J Anesthesiol 2019; 69 (01) 104-108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Liu DH, Tsai MW, Lin SH. et al. Ultrasound-Guided Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Trigger Finger: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96 (12) 2120-2127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Quinnell RC. Conservative management of trigger finger. Practitioner 1980; 224 (1340): 187-190
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP. Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (01) 114-117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Alves PL, Ueta FTS, Ueta RHS. et al. Perfil do cirurgião de coluna brasileiro. Coluna/Columna 2013; 12 (03) 218-223
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Okamura A, Guidetti BC, Caselli R, Borracini JA, Moraes VY, Belloti JC. How Do Board-Certified Hand Surgeons Manage Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? a National Survey. Acta Ortop Bras 2018; 26 (01) 48-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Matsumoto MK, Fernandes M, de Moraes VY, Raduan J, Okamura A, Belloti JC. Treatment of Fingertip Injuries By Specialists in Hand Surgery in Brazil. Acta Ortop Bras 2018; 26 (05) 294-299
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Katzman BM, Steinberg DR, Bozentka DJ, Cain E, Caligiuri DAGJ, Geller J. Utility of obtaining radiographs in patients with trigger finger. Am J Orthop 1999; 28 (12) 703-705
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wolfe SW. Tenosynovitis. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Wolfe SW. eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005: 2137-2158
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Fiorini HJ, Tamaoki MJ, Lenza M, Gomes dos Santos JB, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Surgery for trigger finger (Review) Summary of Findings for the main Comparison. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (02) 1-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Marks MR, Gunther SF. Efficacy of cortisone injection in treatment of trigger fingers and thumbs. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (04) 722-727
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Salim N, Abdullah S, Sapuan J, Haflah NHM. Outcome of corticosteroid injection versus physiotherapy in the treatment of mild trigger fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (01) 27-34
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Yildirim P, Gultekin A, Yildirim A, Karahan AY, Tok F. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of trigger finger: a randomized controlled study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (09) 977-983
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Clark DD, Ricker JH, MacCollum MS. The efficacy of local steroid injection in the treatment of stenosing tenovaginitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51 (02) 179-180
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Rhoades CE, Gelberman RH, Manjarris JF. Stenosing tenosynovitis of the fingers and thumb. Results of a prospective trial of steroid injection and splinting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; (190) 236-238
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Dierks U, Hoffmann R, Meek MF. Open versus percutaneous release of the A1-pulley for stenosing tendovaginitis: a prospective randomized trial. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2008; 12 (03) 183-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Nikolaou VS, Malahias MA, Kaseta MK, Sourlas I, Babis GC. Comparative clinical study of ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release vs open surgical intervention in the treatment of trigger finger. World J Orthop 2017; 8 (02) 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Zyluk A, Jagielski G. Percutaneous A1 pulley release vs steroid injection for trigger digit: the results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (01) 53-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Koegst WHH, Wölfle O, Thoele K, Sauerbier M. [The “Wide Awake Approach” in hand surgery: a comfortable anaesthesia method without a tourniquet]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2011; 43 (03) 175-180
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Cohen TJ. Tratamento percutaneo do dedo am gatilho. Rev Bras Ortop 1996; 31 (08) 690-692
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Pires Neto PJ, Moreira LA, Pires de Las Casas P. É seguro o uso de anestésico local com adrenalina na cirurgia da mão? Técnica WALANT. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52 (04) 383-389
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sardenberg T, Ribak S, Colenci R, Campos RB, Varanda D, Cortopassi AC. 488 hand surgeries with local anesthesia with epinephrine, without a tourniquet, without sedation, and without an anesthesiologist. Rev Bras Ortop 2018; 53 (03) 281-286
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Turowski GA, Zdankiewicz PD, Thomson JG. The results of surgical treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Surg Am 1997; 22 (01) 145-149
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar