Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(09): 1008-1014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721379
Original Article

Proficiency of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Skill in NRP Certified Providers

Srinivasan Mani 
1   Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
,
Munmun Rawat
1   Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective In 2015, Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT) in situations where the provider is “unable to intubate and unable to ventilate.” LMA insertion is being taught in the NRP routinely. However, endotracheal intubation is the primary method considered as the standard of care in neonatal resuscitation. LMA insertion is a relatively simple procedure with an average insertion time of < 10 seconds. Newer generation LMA can have the added advantage of reducing the risk of aerosol generation and improving the safety of the providers. Only a few recent studies have evaluated the LMA insertion skills of neonatal resuscitation providers. We wanted to study the proficiency of NRP providers in the technique of LMA insertion. We hypothesized that NRP providers would have LMA insertion skills equivalent to the standard of care (ETT insertion).

Study Design A manikin-based study was done from July 2019 to December 2019. We enrolled 31 NRP providers with 1 or more years since the first certification and current valid NRP provider/instructor status. The participants were instructed to insert an ETT and LMA in the manikin. The procedures were video recorded. The time taken to insert and start ventilation with each device, including the number of attempts for successful insertion, was noted. A Likert scale questionnaire was filled by each participant indicating the level of confidence, perception of ease, and the ability to provide effective positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with each of the procedures. The paired t-test, chi-square test, and Kruskal–Wallis' test were used for the statistical analysis.

Results Eight (25.8%) out of the 31 participants failed to insert any one of the devices. So, 23 providers were analyzed for the outcomes. We found that the mean duration taken to insert the ETT and LMA was not statistically different (32 vs. 36 seconds). LMA insertion had a higher failure rate compared with ETT. Providers did not perceive confidence to insert LMA when compared with ETT. They did not recognize LMA insertion as a more effortless procedure relative to endotracheal intubation. The providers felt that their ability to provide effective PPV using LMA was inferior to ETT.

Conclusion The NRP certified providers in this study did not demonstrate proficiency in the insertion of LMA equivalent to the endotracheal intubation.

Key Points

  • LMA insertion skill was studied in NRP providers using a manikin.

  • Providers had a higher frequency of failure in inserting LMA compared to ETT.

  • Providers' perceived confidence and effectiveness of the LMA procedure were inferior to ETT.

Keywords

laryngeal mask airway - infant, newborn - resuscitation - manikin - intubation, intratracheal

Authors' Contributions

S.M. contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing the original draft. M.R. contributed to conceptualization, supervision, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 15 September 2020

Accepted: 16 October 2020

Article published online:
29 November 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Niermeyer S. From the Neonatal Resuscitation Program to helping babies breathe: global impact of educational programs in neonatal resuscitation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 20 (05) 300-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Andreatta PB, Dooley-Hash SL, Klotz JJ, Hauptman JG, Biddinger B, House JB. Retention curves for pediatric and neonatal intubation skills after simulation-based training. Pediatr Emerg Care 2016; 32 (02) 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Herrick HM, Glass KM, Johnston LC. et al. for the NEAR4NEOS Investigators. Comparison of neonatal intubation practice and outcomes between the neonatal intensive care unit and delivery room. Neonatology 2020; 117 (01) 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Haubner LY, Barry JS, Johnston LC. et al. Neonatal intubation performance: room for improvement in tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Resuscitation 2013; 84 (10) 1359-1364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (01) e16-e21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hatch LD, Grubb PH, Lea AS. et al. Endotracheal intubation in neonates: a prospective study of adverse safety events in 162 infants. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 62-6.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Paterson SJ, Byrne PJ, Molesky MG, Seal RF, Finucane BT. Neonatal resuscitation using the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 1994; 80 (06) 1248-1253 , discussion 27A
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Ferrarese P, Zanardo V. The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (06) F485-F489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme–a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101 (03) 405-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K. et al. Part 15: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010; 122 (18, Suppl 3): S909-S919
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gandini D, Brimacombe JR. Neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway in normal and low birth weight infants. Anesth Analg 1999; 89 (03) 642-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Pitton M, Magarotto M, Piva D, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway: is the management of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth changing?. Resuscitation 2004; 62 (02) 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dupont WD, Plummer Jr WD. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19 (06) 589-601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yang C, Zhu X, Lin W. et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation during neonatal resuscitation—a secondary publication. BMC Pediatr 2016; 16 (01) 17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB. COIN Trial Investigators. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (07) 700-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Westhoff M, Schönhofer B, Neumann P. et al. [Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure [in German]. Pneumologie 2015; 69 (12) 719-756
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Gandini D, Brimacombe J. Manikin training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14 (06) 493-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Weksler N, Tarnopolski A, Klein M. et al. Insertion of the endotracheal tube, laryngeal mask airway and oesophageal-tracheal Combitube. A 6-month comparative prospective study of acquisition and retention skills by medical students. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22 (05) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Trevisanuto D, Parotto M, Doglioni N, Ori C, Zanardo V, Micaglio M. The Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway™ (LMA): a new neonatal supraglottic device: comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin. Resuscitation 2012; 83 (01) 97-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Roberts I, Allsop P, Dickinson M, Curry P, Eastwick-Field P, Eyre G. Airway management training using the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of two different training programmes. Resuscitation 1997; 33 (03) 211-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bansal SC, Caoci S, Dempsey E, Trevisanuto D, Roehr CC. The laryngeal mask airway and its use in neonatal resuscitation: a critical review of where we are in 2017/2018. Neonatology 2018; 113 (02) 152-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Trevisanuto D, Cavallin F, Nguyen LN. et al. Supreme laryngeal mask airway versus face mask during neonatal resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr 2015; 167 (02) 286-91.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pejovic NJ, Trevisanuto D, Lubulwa C. et al. Neonatal resuscitation using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomised trial in Uganda. Arch Dis Child 2018; 103 (03) 255-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC. et al. SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (21) 1970-1979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Behnke J, Lemyre B, Czernik C, Zimmer K-P, Ehrhardt H, Waitz M. Non-invasive ventilation in neonatology. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019; 116 (11) 177-183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Roberts CT, Hodgson KA. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2017; 3: 15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Marx A, Arnemann C, Horton RL, Amon K, Joseph N, Carlson J. Decreasing neonatal intubation rates: trends at a community hospital. J Neonatal Nurs 2016; 22 (05) 231-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012; 7 (04) e35797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cheung JC, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EYK, Lam KN. Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8 (04) e19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar