Optimizing Inpatient Blood Utilization Using Real-Time Clinical Decision Support

Abstract

Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common medical procedure. While it offers clinical benefits for many, hemodynamically stable patients are often subjected to unwarranted transfusions, with the potential to lead to adverse consequences. We created a real-time clinical decision support (CDS) tool in the electronic health record system to address this problem and optimize transfusion practice as part of an institutional multidisciplinary, team-based patient blood management program.

Methods The real-time CDS tool incorporated the transfusion guidelines published by the AABB. The tool was deployed as a dynamic order set within the computerized provider order entry interface. Prior to implementation, extensive education and outreach to increase provider engagement were provided. The CDS tool was launched in September 2015.

Results The percentage of guideline-indicated RBC transfusions increased from a baseline of 43.6 to 54.2% while the percentage of multiunit (≥ 2 units) RBC transfusions decreased from 31.3 to 22.7% between September 2014 and July 2019. The estimated minimum cost saving over the entire study period was $36,519.36.

Conclusion Our intervention increased guideline-indicated transfusions by 10.6% and reduced multiunit transfusions by 8.6%. The adoption of a dynamic order set for the CDS tool, as opposed to an interruptive alert that displays static alert messages, allowed for more customized and tighter control of RBC orders, leading to a sustained improvement in our transfusion practice.

Keywords

decision support systems - clinical - blood transfusion - medical informatics - blood banks - quality improvement

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The institutional review board approved the project as exempt human subjects research study due to the use of deidentified aggregate data.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 02. November 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Januar 2021

• References

• 1 Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2011: Statistical Brief #165. 2006 . Accessed September 2020 at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354027
• 2 Shander A, Fink A, Javidroozi M. et al; International Consensus Conference on Transfusion Outcomes Group. Appropriateness of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion: the international consensus conference on transfusion outcomes. Transfus Med Rev 2011; 25 (03) 232-246
• 3 Trentino KM, Farmer SL, Swain SG. et al. Increased hospital costs associated with red blood cell transfusion. Transfusion 2015; 55 (05) 1082-1089
• 4 Hofmann A, Farmer S, Shander A. Five drivers shifting the paradigm from product-focused transfusion practice to patient blood management. Oncologist 2011; 16 (Suppl. 03) 3-11
• 5 Thomson A, Farmer S, Hofmann A, Isbister J, Shander A. Patient blood management - a new paradigm for transfusion medicine?. ISBT Sci Ser 2009; 4 (02) 423-435
• 6 Bernard AC, Davenport DL, Chang PK, Vaughan TB, Zwischenberger JB. Intraoperative transfusion of 1 U to 2 U packed red blood cells is associated with increased 30-day mortality, surgical-site infection, pneumonia, and sepsis in general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208 (05) 931-937
• 7 Shander A, Hofmann A, Ozawa S, Theusinger OM, Gombotz H, Spahn DR. Activity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals. Transfusion 2010; 50 (04) 753-765
• 8 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, NHE Summary, including share of GDP, CY 1960–2018. 2019 . Accessed September 2020 at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.html
• 9 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Health Expenditure Projections 2018–2027 Forecast Summary. 2018 . Accessed September 2020 at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/ForecastSummary.pdf
• 10 Leahy MF, Hofmann A, Towler S. et al. Improved outcomes and reduced costs associated with a health-system-wide patient blood management program: a retrospective observational study in four major adult tertiary-care hospitals. Transfusion 2017; 57 (06) 1347-1358
• 11 Goodnough LT, Shieh L, Hadhazy E, Cheng N, Khari P, Maggio P. Improved blood utilization using real-time clinical decision support. Transfusion 2014; 54 (05) 1358-1365
• 12 Jenkins I, Doucet JJ, Clay B. et al. Transfusing wisely: clinical decision support improves blood transfusion practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017; 43 (08) 389-395
• 13 Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S. et al; Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee of the AABB. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (01) 49-58
• 14 Bulger J, Nickel W, Messler J. et al. Choosing wisely in adult hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value. J Hosp Med 2013; 8 (09) 486-492
• 15 Benneyan JC, Lloyd RC, Plsek PE. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12 (06) 458-464
• 16 Derzon JH, Clarke N, Alford A, Gross I, Shander A, Thurer R. Restrictive transfusion strategy and clinical decision support practices for reducing RBC transfusion overuse. Am J Clin Pathol 2019; 152 (05) 544-557
• 17 Kassakian SZ, Yackel TR, Deloughery T, Dorr DA. Clinical decision support reduces overuse of red blood cell transfusions: interrupted time series analysis. Am J Med 2016; 129 (06) 636.e13-636.e20
• 18 Saag HS, Lajam CM, Jones S. et al. Reducing liberal red blood cell transfusions at an academic medical center. Transfusion 2017; 57 (04) 959-964