Digit replantation is a complex surgery that nearly always needs to be done as an emergency. As such it is often difficult to teach. Several models have been developed to train surgeons in this procedure. We compare three rat models of replantation with the aim of ascertaining which most simulates the digit replantation. Inbred albino rats were selected and divided into three groups of 13 each, tail, penile, and hind replant groups. Three rats in each group were anesthetized, the specific amputation injury is created and is replanted for the anatomic component of the study. For the comparative section, 10 animals were anesthesized and the amputated parts were replanted under standard conditions. The parameters measured included weight, vessels and nerve diameters, method of fixation, total ischemia and replant times, the patency rates (after operation and at one week post surgery), as well as postoperative complications. All rats survived in the procedure. There was patency in all groups immediately. Rat tail group had 90%, penile group 100%, and hind limb group 90% survival 1 week after the replantation. There was one mortality in the hind limb group. The penile replant group was the shortest (p < 0.001), and all vessel sizes were comparable except the central artery of the tail which was significantly smaller (p < 0.001). The processes of the hind limb group most simulated the human digit replant procedure, though the ischemia and total replant times are significantly longer (p < 0.005). Though the immediate and 1 week patency rates were similar in all three groups, the hind limb replantation model involved steps most similar to human digit replant surgery and is recommended as the preferred teaching model.
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
References
1
Crowe CS,
Massenburg BB,
Morrison SD.
et al. Global trends of hand and wrist trauma: a systematic analysis of fracture and digit amputation using the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. Inj Prev 2020; 26 (Suppl. 01) i115-i124
6
Shurey S,
Akelina Y,
Legagneux J,
Malzone G,
Jiga L,
Ghanem AM.
The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 201-208
11
Chen J,
Zhang AX,
Chen QZ,
Mu S,
Tan J.
Long-term functional, subjective and psychological results after single digit replantation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2018; 52 (02) 120-126
13
Nam YS,
Jun YJ,
Kim IB,
Cho SH,
Han HH.
Anatomical study of the fingertip artery in tamai zone i: clinical significance in fingertip replantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (01) 45-48
15
Sakrak T,
Köse AA,
Karabağli Y,
Koçman AE,
Ozbayoğlu AC,
Cetįn C.
Rat tail revascularization model for advanced microsurgery training and research. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (07) 391-396
17
Zhang F,
Chin BT,
Ho PR,
Costa MA,
Lineaweaver WC,
Buncke HJ.
Rat tail replantation as a training model for microvascular procedures of digit replantation. Microsurgery 1998; 18 (06) 364-367
18
Amara B,
Fernandez JJ,
Newlin L,
Buncke HJ.
Transfer of the rat tail: an experimental model for free osteocutaneous transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14 (05) 359-362
19
Akyurek M,
Ozkan O,
Safak T,
Ozgentas HE,
Dunn RM.
The penile flap in the rat: description and autotransplantation. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (01) 94-100
20
Akyürek M,
Safak T,
Oztekin C,
Sargon M,
Keçik A.
Dorsal penile vein as a new training model for microvenous anastomosis in rats. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49 (03) 280-284
21
Babuccu O,
Peksoy I,
Hosnuter M,
Kargi E,
Babuccu B.
Evaluation by scintigraphy of hindlimb ischemia in a rat model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (05) 405-410
22
Molitor M,
Kanatani T,
Lanzetta M.
Hind-limb transplantation in the rat: surgical technique, anaesthesia and early postoperative management. In:
Lanzetta M,
Dubernard JM,
Petruzzo P.
eds. Hand Transplantation. Milano: Springer; 2007
24
Mutaf M,
Tasaki Y,
Tanaka K,
Fujii T.
The rat saphenous flap: a fasciocutaneous free flap model without panniculus carnosus. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (04) 402-408
