Attitudes of Argentinean Neonatologists toward Resuscitation of Infants with Trisomies 21, 18, and 13: A Multicenter Survey

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to explore the attitude of Argentinean neonatologists in the delivery room on resuscitating infants with trisomies.

Study Design An anonymous questionnaire was completed by neonatologists staffing level-III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on resuscitation of children with trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Potential sociocultural factors influencing the decision to resuscitate were included.

Results Overall, 314 neonatologists in 34 units in the Buenos Aires region participated (response rate of 54%). The position of neonatologists regarding the resuscitation in the delivery room was that 98% would resuscitate newborns with trisomy 21, and 47% with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13. Resuscitation of newborns with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13 by neonatologists was significantly associated with working in the public sector, religious beliefs, and legal framework.

Conclusion With improvement in the management and treatment of infants with trisomies 18 and 13, Argentinean neonatologists showed a favorable attitude toward resuscitating them in the delivery room.

Key Points

• We explored the attitudes of Argentinean neonatologists on resuscitation of children with trisomies.

• Half of neonatologists would resuscitate newborns with trisomies18 and 13.

• These results suggest an ongoing paradigm shift of the most severe trisomies.

Keywords

trisomies - neonatal resuscitation - neonatology - decision-making - ethics

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 12. November 2020

Angenommen: 04. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Januar 2021

• References

• 1 Kazemi M, Salehi M, Kheirollahi M. Down syndrome: current status, challenges and future perspectives. Int J Mol Cell Med 2016; 5 (03) 125-133
• 2 Nelson KE, Hexem KR, Feudtner C. Inpatient hospital care of children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 in the United States. Pediatrics 2012; 129 (05) 869-876
• 3 Jacobs AP, Subramaniam A, Tang Y. et al. Trisomy 18: a survey of opinions, attitudes, and practices of neonatologists. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170 (10) 2638-2643
• 4 Carey JC. Perspectives on the care and management of infants with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: striving for balance. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012; 24 (06) 672-678
• 5 Cereda A, Carey JC. The trisomy 18 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012; 7: 81
• 6 Lantos JD. Trisomy 13 and 18–treatment decisions in a stable gray zone. JAMA 2016; 316 (04) 396-398
• 7 Springett A, Wellesley D, Greenlees R. et al. Congenital anomalies associated with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: a registry-based study in 16 European countries, 2000-2011. Am J Med Genet A 2015; 167A (12) 3062-3069
• 8 Meyer RE, Liu G, Gilboa SM. et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Survival of children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18: A multi-state population-based study. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170A [phone]
• 9 Presson AP, Partyka G, Jensen KM. et al. Current estimate of Down syndrome population prevalence in the United States. J Pediatr 2013; 163 (04) 1163-1168
• 10 Glasson EJ, Jacques A, Wong K, Bourke J, Leonard H. Improved survival in Down syndrome over the last 60 years and the impact of perinatal factors in recent decades. J Pediatr 2016; 169: 214-20.e1
• 11 Barbero P, Bidondo MP, Duarte S, Groisman B, Liascovich R, Piola A. Reporte Anual RENAC 2019. Accessed April 18, 2020 at: http://www.anlis.gov.ar/cenagem/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Reporte-RENAC-2019.pdf
• 12 Placencia FX, McCullough LB. The history of ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care. J Intensive Care Med 2011; 26 (06) 368-384
• 13 Silberberg A, Herich LC, Croci I, Cuttini M, Villar MJ, Requena Meana P. Limitation of life-sustaining treatment in NICU: physicians' beliefs and attitudes in the Buenos Aires region. Early Hum Dev 2020; 142: 104955
• 14 Haug S, Goldstein M, Cummins D, Fayard E, Merritt TA. Using patient-centered care after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (04) 382-387
• 15 Brosco JP, Feudtner C. Shared decision making for children with trisomy 13 and 18. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (04) 324-325
• 16 Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington K. Cardiac surgery for children with trisomies 13 and 18: where are we now?. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40 (04) 254-260
• 17 Silberberg AA, Gallo JE. Managing end-of-life decisions in critical infants: a survey of neonatologists in Cordoba, Argentina. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (10) e475-e477
• 18 Silberberg AA, Gallo JE. Ethical dilemmas associated with clinicians' decisions about treatment in critically ill infants born in Córdoba, Argentina. J Child Health Care 2017; 21 (01) 121-126
• 19 Morris JK, Alberman E. Trends in Down's syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register. BMJ 2009; 339: b3794
• 20 Carey JC. Attitudes of neonatologists toward delivery room management of confirmed trisomy 18: potential factors influencing a changing dynamic. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (03) e547-e548 , author reply e549
• 21 Hasegawa SL, Fry JT. Moving toward a shared process: The impact of parent experiences on perinatal palliative care. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41 (02) 95-100
• 22 Janvier A, Watkins A. Medical interventions for children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18: what is the value of a short disabled life?. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (12) 1112-1117
• 23 Kobayashi J, Kaneko Y, Yamamoto Y, Yoda H, Tsuchiya K. Radical surgery for a ventricular septal defect associated with trisomy 18. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 58 (05) 223-227
• 24 Kaneko Y, Kobayashi J, Yamamoto Y. et al. Intensive cardiac management in patients with trisomy 13 or trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146A (11) 1372-1380
• 25 Lund ICB, Becher N, Petersen OB, Hill M, Chitty L, Vogel I. Preferences for prenatal testing among pregnant women, partners and health professionals. Dan Med J 2018; 65 (05) A5486
• 26 Patterson J, Taylor G, Smith M, Dotters-Katz S, Davis AM, Price W. Transitions in care for infants with trisomy 13 or 18. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (09) 887-894
• 27 Skotko BG, Levine SP, Macklin EA, Goldstein RD. Family perspectives about Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170A [phone]
• 28 Donohue PK, Boss RD, Aucott SW, Keene EA, Teague P. The impact of neonatologists' religiosity and spirituality on health care delivery for high-risk neonates. J Palliat Med 2010; 13 (10) 1219-1224
• 29 McGraw MP, Perlman JM. Attitudes of neonatologists toward delivery room management of confirmed trisomy 18: potential factors influencing a changing dynamic. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (06) 1106-1110
• 30 Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Indicadores básicos Argentina 2019. Accessed April 18, 2020 at: http://www.deis.msal.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Indicadores-Basicos-2019.pdf
• 31 Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ. Parental hopes, interventions, and survival of neonates with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2016; 172 (03) 279-287
• 32 Weiss AR, Binns HJ, Collins Jr. JW, deRegnier RA. Decision-making in the delivery room: a survey of neonatologists. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (12) 754-760
• 33 Silberberg A, Robetto J, Grimaux G, Nucifora L, Moreno Villares JM. Ethical issues about the paradigm shift in the treatment of children with trisomy 18. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179 (03) 493-497