Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(03): 164-170
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722948
Research Article

The Effect of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on Acoustic Change Complex Responses in High-Frequency Dead-Regioned Hearing Loss

Ebru Kösemihal
1   Department of Audiology, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
,
Ferda Akdas
2   Department of Audiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The study is concern with the distinguishing of the stimuli containing high frequency information with the frequency compression feature at the cortical level using the acoustic change complex (ACC) and the comparison of such with the ACC answers of individuals with normal hearing.

Research Design This is a case–control study.

Study Sample Thirty adults (21 males and nine females) with normal hearing, ranging in age between 16 and 63 years (mean: 36.7 ± 12.9 years) and 20 adults (16 males and four females) with hearing loss ranging in age between 16 and 70 years (mean:49.0 ± 19.8 years) have been included in this study.

Data Collection and Analysis A total of 1,000 ms long stimulus containing 500 and 4,000 Hz tonal stimuli was used for ACC recording. The start frequency (SF) and compression ratio (CR) parameters of the hearing aids were programmed according to the default settings (SFd, CRd) in the device software, the optimal setting (SFo, CRo), and the extra compression (SFe, CRe) requirements and ACC has been recorded for each condition. Evaluation has been performed according to P1-N1-P2 wave complex and ACC complex wave latencies. Independent samples t-test was used to test the significance of the differences between the groups.

Results In all individuals ACC has been observed. There was a significant difference between the wave latencies in normal hearing- and hearing-impaired groups. All wave latency averages of the individuals with hearing impairment were longer than the individuals with normal hearing. There were statistically significant differences between SFd-SFo, SFd-SFe, and SFo-SFe parameters. But there was no difference between CRd, CRo, and CRe in terms of CRs.

Conclusion In order to discriminate high frequency information at the cortical level we should not rely on default settings of the SF and CR of the hearing aids. Optimal bandwidth must be adjusted without performing insufficient compression or over-compression. ACC can be used besides the real ear measurement for hearing aid fitting.

Keywords

frequency lowering - nonlinear frequency compression - acoustic change complex - dead region

Note

This study was completed as E.K.'s PhD degree.




Publication History

Received: 09 July 2020

Accepted: 18 September 2020

Article published online:
24 May 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear 1999; 20 (01) 33-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107 (04) 2155-2161
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Tremblay KL, Friesen L, Martin BA, Wright R. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear 2003; 24 (03) 225-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ostroff JM, Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear 1998; 19 (04) 290-297
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Vickers DA. Factors influencing loudness perception in people with cochlear hearing loss. In: B. Kollmeier, ed. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids. Singapore: World Scientific; 1996: 7-18
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Simpson A, Hersbach AA, McDermott HJ. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. Int J Audiol 2005; 44 (05) 281-292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Salem MS, Talaat MA, Mourad MI. Edge frequency effect on speech recognition in patients with steep-slope hearing loss. Egypt J Otolaryngol 2017; 33 (01) 111
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Glista D, Easwar V, Purcell DW, Scollie S. A pilot study on cortical auditory evoked potentials in children: aided CAEPs reflect improved high-frequency audibility with frequency compression hearing aid technology. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; 2012: 982894
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hazza N, Hassan DM, Hassan A. Evaluation of non-linear frequency compression hearing aids using speech P1-cortical auditory evoked potential. Hear Balance Commun 2016; 14 (01) 36-43
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kirby BJ, Brown CJ. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on ACC amplitude and listener performance. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (05) e261-e270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Moore BCJ. Audiometer implementation of the TEN (HL) test for diagnosing cochlear dead region. White Paper for Interacoustics; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Alexander MJ. Individual variability in recognition of frequency-lowered speech. Semin Hear 2013; 34: 86-109
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Jasper HH. The ten–twenty electrode system of the international federation electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol 1958; 10: 367-380
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Martin BA, Boothroyd A, Ali D, Leach-Berth T. Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (03) 356-366
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Tremblay KL, Billings CJ, Friesen LM, Souza PE. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 93-103
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kirby BJ, Brown CJ. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on ACC amplitude and listener performance. Ear Hea 2015; 36: 261-270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Turkyilmaz MD, Yaralı M, Yağcıoğlu S. et al. Can global field power be an objective tool to assess cortical responses to acoustic change? A study with cochlear implant users. Int Adv Otol 2013; 9 (03) 381-390
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ganapathy MK, Narne VK, Kalaiah MK, Manjula P. Effect of pre-transition stimulus duration on acoustic change complex. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (05) 350-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 He S, Grose JH, Teagle HFB, Buchman CA. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (03) e63-e74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 He S, Grose JH, Buchman CA. Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (10) 771-782
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bentler RA, Walker E, McCreery R, Arenas R, Roush P. Frequency lowering in hearing aids: impact on speech and language development. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (04) 143-152
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Glista D, Scollie S, Bagatto M, Seewald R, Parsa V, Johnson A. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (09) 632-644
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hillock-Dunn A, Buss E, Duncan N, Roush PA, Leibold LJ. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (03) 353-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Perreau AE, Bentler RA, Tyler RS. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance. J Am Acad Audiol 2013; 24 (02) 105-120
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E. et al. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (06) 396-404
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (10) 618-628
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar