Cervical Single-Level Pincer Stenosis Causing Myelopathy: A Technical Note and Medium-term Results of a One-Session Microsurgical 360-Degree Treatment

Abstract

Background and Study Aims Single-level circumferential or pincer stenosis (PS) affects few patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). The surgical technique and medium-term results of a one-session microsurgical 360-degree (m360°) procedure are presented.

Patients Between 2013 and 2018, the data of 23 patients were prospectively collected out of 371 patients with DCM. The m360° procedure comprised a microsurgical anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), with additional plate fixation, followed by flipping the patient and performing a microsurgical posterior bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in crossover technique.

Results The mean age of the patients was 72 years (range: 50–84); 17 patients were males. The mean follow-up time was 12 months (range: 6–31). The patients filled in the patient-derived modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P-mJOA) questionnaire on average 53 months after surgery. One patient received a two-level ACDF. Lesions were mostly (92%) located at the C3/C4 (8/24), C4/C5 (7/24), and C5/C6 (7/24) levels. Functional X-rays showed segmental instability in 10 of 23 patients (44%). All preoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an intramedullary hyperintensity. The median preoperative mJOA score was 13 (range 3), and it improved to 16 (range 3) postoperatively. The mean improvement rate in the mJOA score was 73%. When available, postoperative MRI confirmed good circumferential decompression with persistent intramedullary hyperintensity. There were two complications: a long-lasting radicular paresthesia at C6 and a transient C5 palsy. No revision surgery was required.

Conclusion The one-session m360° procedure was found to be a safe surgical procedure for the treatment of PS, and the medium-term clinical outcome was satisfactory.

Keywords

degenerative cervical myelopathy - cervical spondylotic myelopathy - over-the-top decompression - modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score - pincer stenosis

Publication History

Received: 27 June 2020

Accepted: 28 October 2020

Article published online:
11 October 2021

• References

• 1 Klineberg E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41 (02) 193-202
• 2 Guo JJ, Luk KD, Karppinen J, Yang H, Cheung KM. Prevalence, distribution, and morphology of ossification of the ligamentum flavum: a population study of one thousand seven hundred thirty-six magnetic resonance imaging scans. Spine 2010; 35 (01) 51-56
• 3 Imajo Y, Hiiragi I, Kato Y, Taguchi T. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine. Spine 2009; 34 (02) E83-E87
• 4 Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N. et al. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 2004; 29 (24) 2826-2831
• 5 Morishita Y, Maeda T, Naito M, Ueta T, Shiba K. The pincers effect on cervical spinal cord in the development of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation. Spinal Cord 2013; 51 (04) 331-333
• 6 Peng D, Ma Y, Lei B. Clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior approach microscopic surgery for the pincer mechanism in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 9175234
• 7 Minamide A, Yoshida M, Yamada H. et al. Efficacy of posterior segmental decompression surgery for pincer mechanism in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective case-controlled study using propensity score matching. Spine 2015; 40 (23) 1807-1815
• 8 Veeravagu A, Connolly ID, Lamsam L. et al. Surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of a national, administrative, longitudinal database. Neurosurg Focus 2016; 40 (06) E11
• 9 Zhou X, Cai P, Li Y, Wang H, Xia S, Wang X. Posterior or single-stage combined anterior and posterior approach decompression for treating complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy coincident multilevel anterior and posterior compression. Clin Spine Surg 2017; 30 (10) E1343-E1351
• 10 Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 1981; 6 (04) 354-364
• 11 Rhee JM, Shi WJ, Cyriac M. et al. The P-mJOA: a patient-derived, self-reported outcome instrument for evaluating cervical myelopathy: comparison with the mJOA. Clin Spine Surg 2018; 31 (02) E115-E120
• 12 Parke WW. Correlative anatomy of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1988; 13 (07) 831-837
• 13 Sekhon LH. Posterior cervical decompression and fusion for circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis: review of 50 consecutive cases. J Clin Neurosci 2006; 13 (01) 23-30
• 14 Kurokawa R, Kim P. Cervical laminoplasty: the history and the future. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015; 55 (07) 529-539
• 15 Yeh KT, Lee RP, Chen IH. et al. Laminoplasty instead of laminectomy as a decompression method in posterior instrumented fusion for degenerative cervical kyphosis with stenosis. J Orthop Surg Res 2015; 10: 138
• 16 Fehlings MG, Skaf G. A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine 1998; 23 (24) 2730-2737
• 17 White III AA, Panjabi MM. Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1988; 13 (07) 856-860
• 18 Breig A, Turnbull I, Hassler O. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg 1966; 25 (01) 45-56
• 19 Wang T, Tian XM, Liu SK, Wang H, Zhang YZ, Ding WY. Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: a meta-analysis for last decade. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (12) e6421