RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723970
An Investigation of Medial Tibial Component Overhang in Unicompartmental and Total Knee Replacements Using Ultrasound in the Outpatient Department
Abstract
Tibial component overhang is known to be a contributor to worse outcomes in knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate the presence of tibial component overhang, and whether overhang correlates to a higher local tenderness in both medial unicompartmental and total knee replacements. Also, to determine if a rotational projection phenomenon is presented with radiographs when investigating tibial component overhang. A prospective study, including 64 participants, was performed, where ultrasound measurements were compared with postoperative radiographs. Local tenderness was measured as a pressure pain threshold, determined at 3 months postoperatively using algometry. Sixty-two of sixty-four patients had an underdiagnosed medial overhang on radiographs, with a mean difference of 2.4 mm between radiographs and ultrasound (p < 0.001), presenting a rotational projection phenomenon. When comparing sites with ultrasound measured overhang to sites without overhang measured by ultrasound, a higher local tenderness was observed (p < 0.001). A positive linear correlation was found between patients' overhang and local tenderness (r = 0.2; p = 0.045). Subgroup analysis of medial overhang showed significantly higher tenderness than all other locations. No significant differences were seen for lateral overhang. An apparent rotational projection phenomenon of overhang on radiographs was seen, and a linear association between overhang and local tenderness was demonstrated. This study warrants the use of ultrasound when a surgeon is presented with a patient with postoperative medial tenderness, but no overhang can be seen on radiographs. It should also raise awareness of implant selection and positioning during surgery, especially avoiding the overhang to be localized directly medially.
Ethical Approval
The Danish Ethics committee did not deem this study necessary for ethics approval, as there was no radiation and intervention to the participants. Participants gave informed consent.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 21. Juli 2020
Angenommen: 02. Januar 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Februar 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit H. et al. Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement–does it matter?. Knee 2009; 16 (05) 310-313
- 2 Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Shepherd D, Bossard N, Dantony E. Oversizing the tibial component in TKAs: incidence, consequences and risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2532-2540
- 3 Seil R, Pape D. Causes of failure and etiology of painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (09) 1418-1432
- 4 Dennis DA. Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (04, Suppl 1): 35-40
- 5 Gudena R, Pilambaraei MA, Werle J, Shrive NG, Frank CB. A safe overhang limit for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties based on medial collateral ligament strains: an in vitro study. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (02) 227-233
- 6 Inui H, Taketomi S, Yamagami R, Tahara K, Tanaka S. Snapping Pes Syndrome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2016; 28 (02) 172-175
- 7 Tensho K, Aoki T, Morioka S, Narita N, Kato H, Saito N. Snapping pes syndrome after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (01) 192-194
- 8 Kimura T, Tanikawa H, Hasegawa T. et al. Late onset of the fabella syndrome after total knee arthroplasty. Case Rep Orthop 2019; 2019: 5219237 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5219237.
- 9 Wang JW. Fabellar impingement after total knee replacement--a case report. Changge-ng Yi-xue Zazhi 1995; 18 (02) 185-189
- 10 Nielsen CS, Nebergall A, Huddleston J, Kallemose T, Malchau H, Troelsen A. Medial overhang of the tibial component is associated with higher risk of inferior Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain after knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (05) 1394-1398
- 11 Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit HG. et al. An acceptable limit of tibial component overhang in the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Proc 2018; 91 (III): 411-412
- 12 Edmondson MC, Isaac D, Wijeratna M, Brink S, Gibb P, Skinner P. Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medial pain and functional outcome in the medium term. J Orthop Surg Res 2011; 6: 52 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799x-6-52.
- 13 Biomet Z. Oxford Partial Knee, Microplasty Instrumentation, Surgical Technique. Accessed August 5, 2019 at: https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet/medical-professionals/000-surgical-techniques/knee/oxford-partial-knee-microplasty-instrumentation-surgical-technique.pdf
- 14 Abram SG, Marsh AG, Brydone AS, Nicol F, Mohammed A, Spencer SJ. The effect of tibial component sizing on patient reported outcome measures following uncemented total knee replacement. Knee 2014; 21 (05) 955-959
- 15 Bonnin MP, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, Bossard N, Dantony E. Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2314-2324
- 16 Buckle CE, Udawatta V, Straus CM. Now you see it, now you don't: visual illusions in radiology. Radiographics 2013; 33 (07) 2087-2102
- 17 Pandey PU, Quader N, Guy P, Garbi R, Hodgson AJ. Ultrasound bone segmentation: a scoping review of techniques and validation practices. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46 (04) 921-935
- 18 Guillin R, Botchu R, Bianchi S. Sonography of orthopedic hardware impingement of the extremities. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (09) 1457-1463
- 19 Mutlu EK, Ozdincler AR. Reliability and responsiveness of algometry for measuring pressure pain threshold in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27 (06) 1961-1965
- 20 Dua AB, Neogi T, Mikolaitis RA, Block JA, Shakoor N. Somatosensation in OA: exploring the relationships of pain sensitization, vibratory perception and spontaneous pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19 (01) 307
- 21 Hooten WM, Rosenberg CJ, Eldrige JS, Qu W. Knee extensor strength is associated with pressure pain thresholds in adults with fibromyalgia. PLoS One 2013; 8 (04) e59930 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059930.
- 22 Pelfort X, Torres-Claramunt R, Sanchez-Soler JF. et al. Pressure algometry is a useful tool to quantify pain in the medial part of the knee: an intra- and inter-reliability study in healthy subjects. Orthopaedics Traumatology Surgery Research 2015; 101 (05) 559-563
- 23 Johnson TW, Watson PJ. An inexpensive, self-assembly pressure algometer. Anaesthesia 1997; 52 (11) 1070-1072
- 24 Ferri FF. Ferri's Clinical Advisor 2019 E-Book: 5 Books in 1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018
- 25 Free, Online, Easy-to-Use Power and Sample Size Calculators. Accessed January 22, 2021 at: http://www.powerandsamplesize.com
- 26 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15 (02) 155-163
- 27 Tibrewal SB, Grant KA, Goodfellow JW. The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66 (04) 523-528
- 28 Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R. et al. Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (05) 783-789
- 29 Martin BR, Pegg EC, van Duren BH. et al. Posterior bearing overhang following medial and lateral mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (09) 1938-1945
- 30 Minoda Y, Ikebuchi M, Mizokawa S, Ohta Y, Nakamura H. Asymmetric tibial component improved the coverage and rotation of the tibial component in a medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (05) 416-421
- 31 Padmanabha A, Li MT, Tybor DJ, Smith EL. Risk factors for tibial component oversizing in total knee arthroplasty among African Americans. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (03) 301-305
- 32 Shao L, Wang T, Liao J, Xu W, Liang X, Huang W. Effect of tibial component alignment and posterior slope on tibial coverage in a Chinese population: a three-dimensional anthropometric study. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (01) 53-61
- 33 Simsek ME, Akkaya M, Gursoy S. et al. Posterolateral overhang affects patient quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. journal article. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138 (03) 409-418
- 34 Dodd CAF, Kennedy J, Palan J, Mellon SJ, Pandit H, Murray DW. Radiological evaluation of revised unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in the UK National Joint Registry. Orthop Proc 2018; 100B (12) 2-2
- 35 Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012; 24 (03) 69-71
- 36 Klasan A, Twiggs JG, Fritsch BA. et al. Correlation of tibial component size and rotation with outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140 (11) 1819-1824