Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Thoracic Aorta: Tips and Pitfalls

Abstract

By convention, the ascending aorta is measured by echo from leading edge to leading edge. “Leading edge” connotes the edge of the aortic wall that is closest to the probe (at the top of the inverted “V” of the ultrasound image). By transthoracic echo (TTE), the leading edges are the outer anterior wall and inner posterior wall. By transesophageal echo (TEE), the leading edges are the outer posterior wall and inner anterior wall. Aortic measurements should be taken (by convention) in diastole (when the aorta is moving least). Simple TTE is 70 to 85% sensitive in diagnosing ascending aortic dissection. TEE sensitivity approaches 100%, though the tracheal carina imposes a blind spot on TEE, impeding visualization of distal ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch. While computed tomography angiography may be superior for defining full anatomic extent of aortic dissection, echocardiography is superior in assessing functional consequences such as mechanism and severity of aortic regurgitation, evidence of myocardial ischemia when complicated by coronary dissection, or evidence of tamponade physiology when pericardial effusion is present. Reverberation artifact can mimic a dissection flap. A true flap moves independently of the outer aortic wall which can be confirmed by M-mode. Color flow respects a true flap but does not respect a reverberation artifact. Assessment for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) morphology should be done in systole, not diastole. In diastole, when the valve is closed, the raphé can make a bicuspid valve appear trileaflet. Doming in the parasternal long axis (PLAX) view and an eccentric closure line on PLAX M-mode should also raise suspicion for BAV.

Keywords

echocardiography - aorta - dissection - bicuspid aortic valve

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 11. November 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Oktober 2021

• References

• 1 Kuzmik GA, Sang AX, Elefteriades JA. Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56 (02) 565-571
• 2 LeMaire SA, Russell L. Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011; 8 (02) 103-113
• 3 Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA. et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the american society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019; 32 (01) 1-64
• 4 Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS. et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26 (09) 921-964
• 5 Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Niles NW. et al. Aortic root dilatation as a cause of isolated, severe aortic regurgitation. Prevalence, clinical and echocardiographic patterns, and relation to left ventricular hypertrophy and function. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106 (06) 800-807
• 6 Davies RR, Gallo A, Coady MA. et al. Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81 (01) 169-177
• 7 Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA. et al. Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155 (05) 1938-1950
• 8 Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S. et al. Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging: Endorsed by the society of cardiovascular computed tomography and society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28 (02) 119-182
• 9 Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58 (06) 1072-1083
• 10 Muraru D, Maffessanti F, Kocabay G. et al. Ascending aorta diameters measured by echocardiography using both leading edge-to-leading edge and inner edge-to-inner edge conventions in healthy volunteers. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15 (04) 415-422
• 11 Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Teixidó-Tura G, Galuppo V. et al. Multimodality assessment of ascending aortic diameters: comparison of different measurement methods. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29 (09) 819-826.e4
• 12 Gudbjartsson T, Ahlsson A, Geirsson A. et al. Acute type A aortic dissection - a review. Scand Cardiovasc J 2020; 54 (01) 1-13
• 13 Evangelista A, Flachskampf FA, Erbel R. et al; European Association of Echocardiography, Document Reviewers. Echocardiography in aortic diseases: EAE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11 (08) 645-658
• 14 Bertrand PB, Levine RA, Isselbacher EM, Vandervoort PM. Fact or artifact in two-dimensional echocardiography: avoiding misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29 (05) 381-391
• 15 Patil TA, Nierich A. Transesophageal echocardiography evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Ann Card Anaesth 2016; 19 (supplement): S44-S55
• 16 Borger MA, Fedak PWM, Stephens EH. et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156 (02) e41-e74
• 17 Santarpia G, Scognamiglio G, Di Salvo G. et al. Aortic and left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve without significant valvular dysfunction: a prospective study. Int J Cardiol 2012; 158 (03) 347-352
• 18 Michelena HI, Prakash SK, Della Corte A. et al; BAVCon Investigators. Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). Circulation 2014; 129 (25) 2691-2704