Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Coloproctology 2021; 41(02): 193-197
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724054
Review Article

Understanding the Anatomy of the Denonvilliers Fascia: Review Article

Compreendendo a anatomia da fáscia de Denonvilliers: Artigo de revisão
Mohammed Yousef Alessa 
1   King Faisal University Surgery, Hofuf, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The postoperative outcome of rectal cancer has been improved after the introduction of the principles of total mesorectal excision (TME). Total mesorectal excision includes resection of the diseased rectum and mesorectum with non-violated mesorectal fascia (en bloc resection). Dissection along the mesorectal fascia through the principle of the “holy plane” minimizes injury of the autonomic nerves and increases the chance of preserving them. It is important to stick to the TME principle to avoid perforating the tumor; violating the mesorectal fascia, thus resulting in positive circumferential resection margin (CRM); or causing injury to the autonomic nerves, especially if the tumor is located anteriorly. Therefore, identifying the anterior plane of dissection during TME is important because it is related with the autonomic nerves (Denonvilliers fascia). Although there are many articles about the Denonvilliers fascia (DVF) or the anterior dissection plane, unfortunately, there is no consensus on its embryological origin, histology, and gross anatomy. In the present review article, I aim to delineate and describe the anatomy of the DVF in more details based on a review of the literature, in order to provide insight for colorectal surgeons to better understand this anatomical feature and to provide the best care to their patients.

Resumo

O resultado pós-operatório do câncer retal foi melhorado após a introdução dos princípios da excisão total do mesorreto (TME, na sigla em inglês). A excisão total do mesorreto inclui a ressecção do reto e do mesorreto afetados com fáscia mesorretal não violada (ressecção em bloco). A dissecção ao longo da fáscia mesorretal pelo princípio do “plano sagrado” minimiza a lesão dos nervos autônomos e aumenta a chance de preservá-los. É importante seguir o princípio da TME para evitar: a perfuração do tumor; a violação da fáscia mesorretal, resultando em margem de ressecção circunferencial (CRM) positiva; ou a lesão aos nervos autônomos, especialmente se o tumor estiver localizado anteriormente. Portanto, a identificação do plano anterior de dissecção durante a TME é importante, pois está relacionada com os nervos autonômicos (fáscia de Denonvilliers). Embora existam muitos artigos sobre a fáscia de Denonvilliers (DVF, na sigla em inglês) ou o plano de dissecção anterior, infelizmente não há consenso sobre sua origem embriológica, histologia e anatomia macroscópica. No presente artigo de revisão, pretendo delinear e descrever a anatomia da DVF em mais detalhes com base em uma revisão da literatura, a fim de fornecer subsídios para os cirurgiões colorretais entenderem melhor esta característica anatômica e fornecer o melhor cuidado para seus pacientes.

Keywords

anatomy of denonvilliers fascia - understanding anatomy - review article

Palavras-chave

anatomia da fáscia denonvilliers - compreensão da anatomia - artigo de revisão


Publication History

Received: 20 May 2020

Accepted: 23 August 2020

Article published online:
24 May 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • References

  • 1 Milligan ETC, Morgan CN. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal: with special reference to anorectal fistulae. Lancet 1934; 2 (5804): 1150-1156
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Parks AG. Pathogenesis and treatment of fistuila-in-ano. BMJ 1961; 1 (5224): 463-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Barleben A, Mills S. Anorectal anatomy and physiology. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90 (01) 1-15 Table of Contents
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sboarina A, Minicozzi A, Segattini C. et al. Shape and volume of internal anal sphincter showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (07) 1479-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62 (07) 542-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Goligher JC, Leacock AG, Brossy JJ. The surgical anatomy of the anal canal. Br J Surg 1955; 43 (177) 51-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bollard RC, Gardiner A, Lindow S, Phillips K, Duthie GS. Normal female anal sphincter: difficulties in interpretation explained. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (02) 171-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hussain SM, Stoker J, Laméris JS. Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 1995; 197 (03) 671-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wunderlich M, Swash M. The overlapping innervation of the two sides of the external anal sphincter by the pudendal nerves. J Neurol Sci 1983; 59 (01) 97-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mittal RK, Bhargava V, Sheean G, Ledgerwood M, Sinha S. Purse-string morphology of external anal sphincter revealed by novel imaging techniques. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014; 306 (06) G505-G514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Corlieu A. Centenaire de la Faculte′ de′ Me′decine de Paris, 1794–1894. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale; 1896
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Denonvilliers C-PD. Anatomie du perine′e. Bull Soc Anat Paris 1836; 11: 105-107
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 36 (04) 976-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Benchekroun A, Belahnech Z, Faik M, Marzouk M, Jelthi A. Une étiologie rarissime de tumeur rétro-vésico-prostatique: le mésothéliome kystique du péritoine. Prog Urol 1994; 4 (01) 82-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Embryology and anatomy of the rectum. Semin Surg Oncol 1998; 15 (02) 66-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kinugasa Y, Niikura H, Murakami G. et al. Development of the human hypogastric nerve sheath with special reference to the topohistology between the nerve sheath and other prevertebral fascial structures. Clin Anat 2008; 21 (06) 558-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Havenga K, Enker WE. Autonomic nerve preserving total mesorectal excision. Surg Clin North Am 2002; 82 (05) 1009-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Elliot Smith G. Studies in the anatomy of the pelvis, with special reference to the fasciae and visceral support. Part I. Anat Physiol 1908; 42: 252-270
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Wesson MB. The development and surgical importance of the rectourethralis muscle and Denonvilliers′ fascia. Urol 1922; 8: 339-359
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wesson MB. Fasciae of the urogenital triangle. AMA 1923; 81: 2024-2030
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tobin CE, Benjamin JA. Anatomical and surgical restudy of Denonvilliers′ fascia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945; 80: 373-388
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Nagpal K, Bennett N. Colorectal surgery and its impact on male sexual function. Curr Urol Rep 2013; 14 (04) 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1 (8496): 1479-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G, Daniels IR. Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is by dissection in front of Denonvilliers' fascia. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (01) 121-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar